Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why has Greenspan urged home buyers to choose adjustable-rate mortages over fixed-rates?
Mortgage News (among others) ^ | 5-23-03 | me

Posted on 05/23/2004 1:22:06 PM PDT by inquest

OK, hopefully some financially knowledgable Freepers will show up to this thread to help me understand this, because I make no pretensions to being a guru (or even a journeyman) on this kind of stuff.

Why in tarnation would Greenspan recommend, at a time when interest rates (from what I hear) are at historic lows, that people switch to adjustable-rate mortgages? It makes absolutely no sense to me. Does anyone out there seriously think this would be good advice?


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: fed; greenspan; mortgage
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last
To: inquest

A better question would be: Why does a single political appointee feel it's his prerogative to micromanage the worlds largest and most vibrant economy with unsubstantiated comments and opinions, and why does that economy jump like lemmings at his every utterance, when it claims to be the pinnacle of self-autonomous, self-regulating economic systems ever devised?


41 posted on 05/23/2004 2:09:40 PM PDT by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Torie
It makes sense to get one of those fixed mortgages that flips to a variable after a number of years ("Mixed Fixed"), if you plan to move in 10 years or less.

Now that I can see doing. Fortunately, I personally am not needing to buy just yet. I just saw that statement from him and it left me scratching my head. But thanks for the links.

Surprised to see so many responses to the thread, especially on a Sunday. Shows you how much I hang out in the business section of FR.

42 posted on 05/23/2004 2:11:01 PM PDT by inquest (The only problem with partisanship is that it leads to bipartisanship)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: SpaceBar

That single appointee has done a fantastic job, and much of our economic prosperity and stability is due to his savvy. Greenspan bashing is for the sans culottes IMO. I suspect Greenspan's comments were taken out of context, because without various and sundry qualifications, they were ill advised, and Greenspan is rarely ill advised.


43 posted on 05/23/2004 2:12:20 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Torie

Where is your control group?


44 posted on 05/23/2004 2:13:18 PM PDT by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: inquest

Because his house is already paid for and he will never buy another new one?


45 posted on 05/23/2004 2:14:12 PM PDT by AD from SpringBay (We have the government we allow and deserve.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: balrog666
Complete bovine excrement! A low, fixed-rate, assumable mortgage will make your house very attractive to buyers when you go to sell.

If you can find a low fixed rate assumable, you have a point. But none of the fixed rate loans I've seen are assumable, and I am sure there is a premium on them if they are.

46 posted on 05/23/2004 2:14:20 PM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: SpaceBar
Actually it is in your very "spacebar." We are everywhere, and omnipresent.
47 posted on 05/23/2004 2:14:33 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: inquest

IMO it is a continuation of the type of bad advice Robert McTeer gave about everyone should go out and buy an SUV to keep the economy going.

The Federal Reserve and the government are petrified that people will stop buying houses. When they do, the enormous debt bubble and the US dollar will start to unwind in an uncontrollable manner.

Greenspan knows that with adjustable mortgages people can afford a bigger house on paper, therefore the bubble is goosed that much more. We are living in the largest credit bubble in the history of man, thanks to Alan Greenspan.


48 posted on 05/23/2004 2:15:52 PM PDT by OK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

I strongly disagree. Did you realize the constitution recommended the death penalty for anyone debasing the silver/gold currency? The Federal Reserves creation was unconsitutional and remains that way today.

Here is what the constitution says about gold/silver as money:

Section. 10.
Clause 1: No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility.


49 posted on 05/23/2004 2:17:11 PM PDT by crush-the-left
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: inquest
How bout this one?

He KNOWS rates are going to SKYROCKET and he is protecting the entire banking system from us po' folks.

50 posted on 05/23/2004 2:17:41 PM PDT by litehaus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
Exactly.

"assumable mortgage "Some mortgages allow future buyers of your home to take over the remaining loan balance of your mortgage. If you need to sell your house but interest rates are high, having an assumable mortgage may be handy. You may be able to offer the buyer your assumable loan at a lower interest rate than the current going interest rate. Most assumables are adjustable-rate mortgages -- fixed-rate, assumable mortgages are nearly extinct these days because lenders realize that they lose a great deal of money on these types of mortgages when interest rates skyrocket."

Free lunches are really hard to find these days. Life sucks.

51 posted on 05/23/2004 2:18:02 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Jack Wilson

What portion of our national debt is short term? Seems to me the clinton admin restructured the national debt to short term.


52 posted on 05/23/2004 2:18:05 PM PDT by PeterPrinciple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: inquest
The more of these comments I read, the more convinced I am that the Housing bubble is going the route of the dot.com bubble and soon.
53 posted on 05/23/2004 2:18:55 PM PDT by edger (A)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crush-the-left

Actually, I don't see where you disagreed with my point. There is not enough gold in the world to base our money on. Whether it is Constitutional or not is different issue.


54 posted on 05/23/2004 2:21:42 PM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: OK

In the last 24 years, we have owned six homes, with various fixed rate and adjustable mortgages. In every case, including the ones where my husband insisted on a fixed rate, we would have been better off with an adjustable. The only reason we don't have one now is we don't owe enough to do another no-cost re-fi so we have a ten-year fixed. We've done five no-cost re-fi's in the nine years we've had our current home (which we will probably retire in).

Also, as "low" as rates seem now, they are actually "high" historically compared to current inflation. With global overcapacity in almost every area, I don't see any big inflation coming soon. Adjustables make sense for most people.


55 posted on 05/23/2004 2:22:28 PM PDT by littleleaguemom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

Actually gold AND silver could be used as currency...as they have throughout history. For the past 4000 years gold was used for "large" denominations, and silver (and sometimes copper) for the smaller denominations. When we are again forced to go back on the gold/silver standard, there is plenty of precious metals around to accomodate this.

My point is that throughout history, whenever governments took their countries off the gold/silver standard and created "fiat" money, that money inevitably became worthless. And their countries suffered greatly after a short-term fiat money created "boom".


56 posted on 05/23/2004 2:29:24 PM PDT by crush-the-left
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: littleleaguemom

In every case, including the ones where my husband insisted on a fixed rate, we would have been better off with an adjustable.

Hind site is better than fore site.........

It could have been the other way around. The rules of the game are changing daily. How much risk are people willing to take?


57 posted on 05/23/2004 2:29:25 PM PDT by PeterPrinciple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
Hard money is impracticle. You can not limit the expanding of the world economies on the amount of gold that is dug up.

Fiat money is the road to ruin. That's because the people who stand to benefit by inflating the currency are the same ones in charge of the currency.

The best currency is a fiat currency with wise governmental management.

The next best currency is a precious metals backed currency.

The absolute WORST currency is a fiat currency with unwise management!

58 posted on 05/23/2004 2:29:44 PM PDT by Siegfried (Wow! Andy Kaufman is STILL dead! That's the funniest joke I've ever heard! The guy is a genius!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: SpaceBar

the better question is where is the constitutional authority for Congress to delegate its responsibility to issue currency and regulate the value thereof


59 posted on 05/23/2004 2:30:50 PM PDT by agitator (...And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Siegfried
The absolute WORST currency is a fiat currency with unwise management!

AMEN!!

IMO....sadly the vast majority of people are unaware of the dangers of fiat money. There has never been a fiat money in history that has not eventually brought on absolute destruction on the financial system of the day. For us to think we are somehow "different" is quite naive.
60 posted on 05/23/2004 2:34:17 PM PDT by crush-the-left
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson