CLINTON: Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
-Snip-
The atrocities that have been depicted in photographs were very graphically, verbally, described in the Taguba report. It doesn't take a lot of imagination to read those descriptions and have one's stomach just turn in disgust.
The focus on the pictures being released is, with all due respect, missing the point. The report was well known, and apparently discussed on numerous occasions. And obviously, the release of the pictures to the entire world was devastating.
But the underlying conduct, and the failure of the command, both at the site and further up the chain, to act with the appropriate quick response, is really at the heart of what the most serious problems we face here today are.
-snip-
Rummy answers:
RUMSFELD: Well, Senator, first let me say, with respect to the question that Senator Reed raised, I can't conceive of anyone looking at the pictures and suggesting that anyone could have recommended, condoned, permitted, encouraged, subtly, directly, in any way, that those things take place.
Second, the decision that was made by the president of the United States that you referred to was announced. And in the announcement it was said that the Al Qaida in Guantanamo that are captured in the world, mostly in Afghanistan, would be treated consistent with the Geneva Convention. That is a fact.
You say the report was well known. I don't know how you know that. All I know is when it made the public, when somebody took a secret document out of prosecutorial channels and released it to the press, I do not believe it was yet anywhere in the Pentagon. Certainly, I had not been given it or seen it.
I quite agree with you. When you read the report, you do get an impression, as you suggested, that there is something much worse than what was in the press release, for example, in January or the discussion in March by the Central Command.
RUMSFELD: But that was not something that had been moved past the Central Command, to my knowledge. It may have been somewhere in the Department of Defense, but certainly I had not received a copy. It was still in those channels.
WARNER: Thank you very much, Senator.
1 posted on
05/07/2004 8:41:36 PM PDT by
abner
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
To: maryz; goodnesswins; TomGuy; cyncooper; cake_crumb; A Citizen Reporter; Carolinamom; Howlin
Ping!
2 posted on
05/07/2004 8:42:50 PM PDT by
abner
(FREE THE MIRANDA MEMOS! http://www.intelmemo.com or http://www.wintersoldier.com)
To: abner
"You say the report was well known. I don't know how you know that. All I know is when it made the public, when somebody took a secret document out of prosecutorial channels and released it to the press, I do not believe it was yet anywhere in the Pentagon."
Well...
To: abner
nice job, Teri.
To: ntnychik; devolve; MeekOneGOP; PhilDragoo
Ping!
7 posted on
05/07/2004 8:46:14 PM PDT by
potlatch
( Medals do not make a man. Morals do.)
To: abner
I have to tell you, that when I was listening to the hearing and she said this phrase:
"The focus on the pictures being released is, with all due respect, missing the point."
That's what made me stand up and take notice. She is complicit in the picture release.
To: abner
guess my theory is this: If she isn't behind the leak, she knows exactly who is. If we can find out who that Staffer was that was in this prison and we might find out if she is
14 posted on
05/07/2004 8:49:04 PM PDT by
Mo1
(Make Michael Moore cry.... DONATE MONTHLY!!!)
To: abner
To: abner
Thanks for the post, abner. Hillary's moles and leftovers in the Pentagon and elsewhere are hard at work to leak information to her and other democrats in order to undermine the presidency, our troops and, in effect, aid the terrorists who are at war with America. Some DARE call it TREASON!
16 posted on
05/07/2004 8:49:20 PM PDT by
Angelwood
(FReepers are Everywhere! We Support Our Troops! (Hillary's Vast Rt Wg Conspiracy))
To: dd5339
Thread to follow.
..not suprising that something this sleazy would have the Clintoon's greasy fingerprints on it.
17 posted on
05/07/2004 8:49:23 PM PDT by
cavtrooper21
(Hooah??? HOOOAAHHHH!!!!!)
To: abner
What did Senator Clinton know, when did she know it, and HOW did she know it?
To: abner
Over at DU they're arguing about why Gore lost!!!!!! Now they're blaming it on Leiberman!!!! Almost four years and they're still debating it. Unbelievable.
33 posted on
05/07/2004 8:58:13 PM PDT by
Hildy
(...Love like you've never been hurt and live like it's heaven on Earth. - Mark Twain)
To: andrew; Richard Poe
Ping!
34 posted on
05/07/2004 8:58:38 PM PDT by
abner
(FREE THE MIRANDA MEMOS! http://www.intelmemo.com or http://www.wintersoldier.com)
To: abner
Thankyou for the post abner.
I wasn't able to hear any of this all day, just excerpts on local news.
This is very interesting, and I love Rummys response.
The dems will do anything to undermine Prez Bush, the Military and this Country.
The battle between Good and Evil, no question in my mind.
kennedy and hitlery should go for a swim.
39 posted on
05/07/2004 9:04:30 PM PDT by
The Mayor
(A true friend helps you keep going when you feel like giving up.)
To: abner
Bump!
40 posted on
05/07/2004 9:04:35 PM PDT by
MadMoo
To: Mrs Zip; BOBWADE
ping
41 posted on
05/07/2004 9:05:26 PM PDT by
zip
(Remember: DimocRat lies told often enough became truth to 42% of americans)
To: abner
If it was not in the Pentagon, it was with the DOJ, right?
46 posted on
05/07/2004 9:07:54 PM PDT by
ikka
To: CasearianDaoist
ping
51 posted on
05/07/2004 9:10:13 PM PDT by
prairiebreeze
(Ted Rall is a waste of perfectly good oxygen.)
To: abner
From the Myers/Dayton exchange......
MYERS: Thank you, sir.
Thank you, Senator Dayton.
This was not to suppress anything. What I asked CBS News to do was to delay the release of the pictures , given the current situation in Iraq, which was as bad as it had been since major combat ended, because I thought it bring direct harm to our troops; it would kill our troops.
We talked about it, and I said, "I know this report will eventually come out. But this -- if you can delay it for some period of time -- it would be helpful."
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Because of Dayton's continual reference to the pictures as the report, even the Chairman JCOS eventually lost the distinction between the "pictures" and the "report".
I bring this up because, unlike Kerry and the medals vs. ribbons farce, I'm of the belief that the "report" and the "pictures", when referenced in the context as to their public disclosure, are two seperate and distinct pieces of information and not interchangeable.
To: abner
As soon as she made her remark and Rumsfeld responded, the look on her face was, 'ut oh - I screwed up'.
I posted a comment about while that while she was still questioning earlier today.
She had more information, apparently, about the photos, etc., than even the Pentagon/Rumsfeld had. That does raise suspicions.
59 posted on
05/07/2004 9:16:12 PM PDT by
TomGuy
(Clintonites have such good hind-sight because they had their heads up their hind-ends 8 years.)
To: abner
I don't know how you know that. When Rumsfeld said this, my ears perked up. It was a kind of verbal bookmark for the savvy listener.
I think he knows darn well how she knows that, and wanted to call attention to the moment. Mission accomplished, Mr. Secretary.
60 posted on
05/07/2004 9:17:01 PM PDT by
Petronski
(John Kerry's shabby lies make me very cranky.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson