Skip to comments.
Specter Wins 51-49 Republican Senatorial Primary: live thread
4/27/2004
| self
Posted on 04/27/2004 9:10:16 AM PDT by rudy45
My apologies if a thread already exists. I did a search on "Toomey" and found nothing.
I arrived at my polling area (suburban Philadelphia) at 6:45 am to hand out palm cards. The weather is terrific this morning, but turnout (I thought) was light (I had to leave at 9:15, but will be back).
Actually, I have a good feeling about Pat.
TOPICS: Breaking News; Politics/Elections; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: arlenspecter; arlensphincter; cino; cinosandrinos; election; electionussenate; paprimary; pattoomey; pennsylvania; primary; rino; rinosrule; rinosrus; scottishlaw; soros; specter; toomey
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 741-760, 761-780, 781-800 ... 1,161-1,178 next last
To: pittsburgh gop guy
Right! Specter running is a net plus for Bush in PA. Also, every seat in the Senate counts. There are always a RINO or two there ready to bolt, so we need at least 52 seats. Specter should win comfortably in November.
761
posted on
04/27/2004 9:22:48 PM PDT
by
ubaldus
To: ClintonBeGone
Channel 10 hasn't declared a winner and there are 400 precincts to be counted.
762
posted on
04/27/2004 9:22:52 PM PDT
by
Tribune7
(Vote Toomey April 27)
To: All
This election explains why our current GOP leadership has become democrat like. As long as Republicans continue to elect and re-elect RINO's, we are getting the party we deserve.
This is why Bush has been spending money like a druken sailor. Why our leadership does not take on democrats like it's an act of war.
Republicans are telling our own party this is what we expect from them. Act like a democrat, get re-elected.
763
posted on
04/27/2004 9:23:02 PM PDT
by
Brytani
(Politics: n. from Greek; "poli"-many; "tics"-ugly, bloodsucking parasites.)
Comment #764 Removed by Moderator
To: Fledermaus
Yeah, but there's something kooky about that state: Gore and Rendell come to mind.
765
posted on
04/27/2004 9:23:17 PM PDT
by
Cosmo
(If Iraq is Bush's Vietnam, then Ted Kennedy is Bush's Jane Fonda)
To: Political Junkie Too
Specter as chairman of the Judiciary Committee is not better than Chuck Schumer.
766
posted on
04/27/2004 9:23:19 PM PDT
by
Fledermaus
(Ðíé F£éðérmáú§ ^;;^ says, "Why are Republicans such wimps?")
To: antaresequity
This actually makes Bush look weak. His horse sucked and crossed the finish line panting like an old nag... You left out a part--
This actually makes Bush look weak. His Winning horse sucked and crossed the finish line FIRST panting like an old nag ahead of the other horses...
767
posted on
04/27/2004 9:23:21 PM PDT
by
RobFromGa
(There isn't always an easy path, but there is always a right path.)
To: GOPrincess
I couldn't understand Santorum saying Toomey was too conservative to win... It appears that Toomey was -- too conservative to win.
To: free2freep
So what is next for Toomey?
PA governor?
Maybe - but who the hell wants that? Though I do think Rendell should be able to be beaten.
If Toomey was smart, he would forget about politics and go back to the private sector and make money. I learned a long time ago that politics suck, and that in the end the money-people always win anyway.
But why the hell can't I stop caring about it......?
To: Antoninus
Given that there are other issues, if the 2 candidates are both pro-abortion, you need to look at other issues.
Do you want to protect the born as well as the unborn? If you do, you need to support the candidates on that will support the war on terror.
770
posted on
04/27/2004 9:23:37 PM PDT
by
sharktrager
(The greatest strength of our Republic is that the people get the government they deserve.)
To: All
Look. We all knew this was coming. Whoever won was going to risk votes for the most conservative of the two viable options for President.
If Toomey had won, the moderates around Philly may have voted for Kerry because Toomey campaigning in Philly for Bush and himself would be meaningless and would attract nothing and they might also have voted for Hoeffel.
With Specter the winner, we are exactly where were were last week. The same guy is running for president. We can get petulant and decide Bush is to blame because he is loyal to party incumbents or we can keep an eye on the big picture -- which doesn't change. We must support the rightmost candidate who is viable in general elections. Period. In general elections there is no other responsible option.
Take solace in knowing Specter is 74. He won't be around much longer.
771
posted on
04/27/2004 9:23:37 PM PDT
by
Owen
To: Cosmo
True.
772
posted on
04/27/2004 9:23:39 PM PDT
by
Fledermaus
(Ðíé F£éðérmáú§ ^;;^ says, "Why are Republicans such wimps?")
To: Political Junkie Too
If Specter wins this, I'm expecting him to become Bush's "boy toy."As if a left-leaning RINO would keep any promise offered in exchange for such an endorsement.
GWB blew it.
To: Torie
Yep- that kind of stuff happens... It looked good for a while, Toomey fought the good fight... Hope there's a bright future for him somewhere.
To: Tribune7
Unless those 400 precients can somehow find 16,000 votes for Toomey, its over.
RINO Specter wins. Thank you Bush and the ever principled Santorum.
775
posted on
04/27/2004 9:23:57 PM PDT
by
Simmy2.5
(Kerry. When you need to ketchup...)
To: antaresequity
The Bush family has hi-jacked the Conservative movement from the Reaganites and ruined it. Now should be our time, Bush is wasting it.
776
posted on
04/27/2004 9:24:07 PM PDT
by
Finalapproach29er
(" Permitting homosexuality didn't work out very well for the Roman Empire")
To: GOPrincess
Santorum and Bush could have won this for Toomey. I couldn't understand Santorum saying Toomey was too conservative to win in PA given how conservative Santorum himself is! Specter and judges are a disaster. Toomey was worth the gamble. I think it was more about the Commercials that Arlen ran and not so much about Santorum and Bush
One was about Toomey voting for RU40
777
posted on
04/27/2004 9:24:07 PM PDT
by
Mo1
(Make Michael Moore cry.... DONATE MONTHLY!!!)
To: Fledermaus
Go ahead, flame me. I'm resolved this forum isn't about debate any longer.
Nonsense. Of course it is about debate. But to debate we need some intellegent points to be made not just "I'm mad at the world because I didn't get my way" rants.
778
posted on
04/27/2004 9:24:08 PM PDT
by
MNJohnnie
(Vote Bush 2004-We have the solutions, Kerry Democrats? Nothing but slogans)
To: ping jockey
Two words: Don Sundquist...his damage will wrought horrors for years to come!
779
posted on
04/27/2004 9:24:34 PM PDT
by
Fledermaus
(Ðíé F£éðérmáú§ ^;;^ says, "Why are Republicans such wimps?")
To: Fledermaus
megga dittos to you Fledermaus
780
posted on
04/27/2004 9:24:43 PM PDT
by
sefarkas
(why vote Democrate-lite???)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 741-760, 761-780, 781-800 ... 1,161-1,178 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson