1 posted on
04/16/2004 9:17:44 AM PDT by
kattracks
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
To: All
bump
2 posted on
04/16/2004 9:20:04 AM PDT by
XHogPilot
To: kattracks
Interesting to see if it will see the light of day...
3 posted on
04/16/2004 9:20:38 AM PDT by
battlecry
To: kattracks
Only the democrats could take a situation (the capture of the Millenium Bomber) wherein they did everything wrong and turn it into a positive ("the Clinton administration was Johnny-on-the-spot fighting terrorism.") The dems are beneath contempt.
To: kattracks
But Kean told us the Gorlick is one of the most non-partisan and hardest working memebers of the commisission.
He also told to us to stay out of there business.
They must love the internet.
5 posted on
04/16/2004 9:21:48 AM PDT by
The South Texan
(The Democrat Party and the leftist (ABCCBSNBCCNN NYLATIMES)media are a criminal enterprise!)
To: kattracks
PLEEEEEEASE fire this off to O'Reilly, Hannity and the people who will actually REVEAL something like this.
6 posted on
04/16/2004 9:22:01 AM PDT by
military cop
(military cop)
To: kattracks
Scr*w the commission, Ashcroft should de-classify it.
8 posted on
04/16/2004 9:24:16 AM PDT by
Cooter
To: kattracks
More dirty from Gorelick and the Clinton Administration.
Ashcroft should declassify alot more stuff. Gorelick seems to have the key person in relation to OKC and TWA800, too.
9 posted on
04/16/2004 9:24:16 AM PDT by
TomGuy
(Clintonites have such good hind-sight because they had their heads up their hind-ends 8 years.)
To: kattracks
Hey, Kean. Incoming!
10 posted on
04/16/2004 9:26:20 AM PDT by
mewzilla
To: kattracks
That the mainstream press isn't running with this story is unconscionable.
To: kattracks; FairOpinion; Grampa Dave; BOBTHENAILER; archy; Howlin; All
"...Gorelick's terrorist-friendly directive..."Ok, considering the likely Clinton connections to the U.N. Oil/Food scandal, would it be too tin-foilish to ask if they were so "friendly" because of bumbling, or because Clinton was on the take from certain dictators? (Indirectly of course, as it first had to pass through several other sets of hands before reaching the Clintons.)
13 posted on
04/16/2004 9:29:45 AM PDT by
MizSterious
(First, the journalists, THEN the lawyers.)
To: kattracks
wow
17 posted on
04/16/2004 9:32:40 AM PDT by
rwfromkansas
("Am I not destroying my enemies when I make friends of them?" -- Abraham Lincoln)
To: kristinn; Angelwood
Check this out...
22 posted on
04/16/2004 9:34:32 AM PDT by
kcvl
To: kattracks
I also want information on her TWA 800 cover-up.
26 posted on
04/16/2004 9:35:49 AM PDT by
mabelkitty
(John Kerry is the sad clown of life.)
To: kattracks
a hunch!The Luckiest man alive is Bill Clinton. Inherits a booming economy, INTERNET revolution, the biginning and middle of the dot com bubble, witnesses dying at an opportune times, a WIMPY Senate (Impeachment Trial), a COVER-UP sympathetic Press and a CUSTOM AGENT with a "HUNCH".
X42 definitely sleeps with the Pope.
27 posted on
04/16/2004 9:36:43 AM PDT by
PISANO
(Our troops...... will NOT tire...will NOT falter.....and WILL NOT FAIL!!!)
To: All
30 posted on
04/16/2004 9:38:54 AM PDT by
TigersEye
(One nation under God ....... or war.)
To: kattracks
I was sick all last night and was watching late reruns on Foxnews. They have a great 1 or 2 minute newsbreak with Jim Angle that hammers Gorelick and highlights Ashcrofts relevant testimony. I haven't see it yet during the day, but it is devastating, as it talks about how the "wall" Gorelick setup essentially divided the FBI into two separate entities (one for intel/another for criminal investigation) that could no longer correspond with one and other. Ashcroft is also shown reading a letter before the 9/11 commisssion from an FBI agent, stating that this wall will one-day be responsible for the deaths of thousands of Americans.
They also briefly touched on the Moussaoui case, and how he was arrested on August 15, 2001, but FBI agents were refused a search warrant of his laptop because the Gorelick Memorandum added further restrictions to FISA, as the FBI denied the warrant based on these new restrictions. Showing a clip from the Gorelick memo, Angle highlighted how it plainly stated, in the memorandum, how it "went beyond what was legally required." The Gorelick rules were meant to ensure that "no 'proactive' investigative efforts or technical coverages" of terrorist suspects be carried out on U.S. soil. It was the best two minute summation I have seen...and it alone, should be enough remove this dangerous woman. Play it again, FOX.
37 posted on
04/16/2004 9:42:24 AM PDT by
cwb
(Kerry: Sadr is a legitimate voice in Iraq being silenced by America..and Hamas are sorta terrorists.)
To: kattracks
Whoa! There's another!?
That's worth a Bump!
Kean is a worthless scumbag for knuckling-under to this crap.
40 posted on
04/16/2004 9:47:01 AM PDT by
DoctorMichael
(The Fourth Estate is a Fifth Column!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
To: kattracks
Why are we waiting for this?
It should be out there and Jamie Gorelick should be off her Committee chair and sitting on on a chair behind the 'witness table'.
That said; it is clear why Tom Dachle felt Jamie's presence was necessary.
41 posted on
04/16/2004 9:47:11 AM PDT by
cricket
(The Democrats and the terrorists have a common enemy. . .)
To: kattracks
Curiouser and curiouser--'wonder if gorelick is starting to feel like alice after eating a tasty tidbit?
43 posted on
04/16/2004 9:51:08 AM PDT by
freeangel
(freeangel)
To: kattracks
I'm with Mr. Levin . Lets get it all out in the open . You agenda driven fringe folks wanted this . Drag out every damn filthy rug there is and let the public in on what many of you D.C. types are up to behind your closed door sessions .
44 posted on
04/16/2004 9:51:17 AM PDT by
Ben Bolt
( " The Spenders " ..)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson