Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

America no longer white, united, English-speaking
The Miami Herald ^ | 02 April 2004 | Patrick J. Buchanan

Posted on 04/03/2004 11:22:26 AM PST by MegaSilver

In 1960, when JFK defeated Nixon, America was a nation of 160 million, 90 percent white and 10 percent black, with a few million Hispanics and Asians sprinkled among us.

We were one nation, one people. We worshipped the same God, spoke the same English language, studied American history and English literature, honored the same heroes, read the same books, watched the same TV shows, went to the same movies and saw ourselves as defenders of Western civilization against the godless communism of the Soviet Empire.

We were confident and proud of who we were. That was yesterday. But due to the Immigration Act of 1965 and the cultural revolution of the '60s, that America is now gone forever. And as one studies the latest projections of the Census Bureau, the America of our grandchildren will be another country altogether, a nation unrecognizable to our parents, a giant Brazil of the North.

In 2050, there will be three times as many people living here as in 1960 -- 420 million. White Americans will be a minority, 49 percent, and falling. Hispanics in the United States, more than 100 million, will be equal to the population of today's Mexico. Our Asian population will be almost as large as our African-American population today.

By countries of origin, America will be a Third World nation. Our cities will look like Los Angeles today. Los Angeles and the cities of Texas, Arizona and California will look like Mexico City.

Writing in Foreign Policy, Harvard Professor Samuel Huntington, author of Who We Are, raises an alarm about the huge infusion of Hispanics into the Southwest, and for many reasons.

Much of this mass immigration is illegal. Vast numbers are coming here only to work. They are not assimilating. They do not want to become Americans. They are concentrating in states bordering Mexico, which is their country and a nation with a historic grievance against us. They are holding on to their language and culture, creating a Hispanic nation within our nation. By 2050, there will be scores of millions of people living here whose loyalty is to a foreign country.

Moreover, as multiculturalism has captured our schools and colleges, immigrant children will have prejudices and grievances against America and the West reinforced as they learn. The academic elite that controls these schools already paints America as a nation with a rancid history of genocide, slavery, racism, oppression and imperialism.

Is the Census Bureau future the future that Americans wish? No. Are they willing to risk it for their grandchildren? No.

Why, then, does that future appear inevitable?

Answer: Though a majority of Americans wish to preserve the land they grew up in for their children, our elites -- political, academic, cultural and corporate -- are either unwilling to conserve that America or indifferent to its disappearance.

Most Americans want immigration cut back and all illegal aliens sent back. Why is the will of the majority, expressed in polls and referenda, not reflected in law or policy? Because we no longer live in a democratic republic; we are ruled by a managerial elite.

America's corporate elites want an endless supply of cheap labor. Our judges throw out popularly enacted laws to which they object. Our academic elites work to see ''white, racist America'' disappear. Our neo-Marxist cultural elites wish to be the gravediggers of the West and of Christian culture. And America's conservative party, the Republican Party, believes that Hispanics hold the key to retention of presidential power and is anxious not to offend Mexican President Vicente Fox.

If, by 2050, the America we grew up in has become a Tower of Babel of squabbling minorities that is falling apart, it will be because of the treason of the elites, and our lack of will to overthrow them.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aliens; aztlan; balkanization; breakingnews; buchanan; diversity; immigrantlist; immigration; multiculturalism; patbuchanan; patrickbuchanan; patrickjbuchanan; racistpat; sowhat; whoweare
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 641-660661-680681-700 ... 1,021-1,027 next last
To: Dane
Most of the immigrants today are Mexicans in near poverty who cross the border to take advantage of America's social programs.

I happen to have had very positive life experiences with Mexicans. I have a very positive attitude toward them. All that being said, it has never for a moment lead me to an attitude of throwing the gates wide open.

661 posted on 04/04/2004 12:05:11 PM PDT by iconoclast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 646 | View Replies]

To: ronnieb
Amen brother, I hope you're right.
662 posted on 04/04/2004 12:06:53 PM PDT by iconoclast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 648 | View Replies]

To: Cronos
Thanks for the post. Your posts put me to bed early last night, and I expect they will tonight.
663 posted on 04/04/2004 12:08:32 PM PDT by iconoclast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 649 | View Replies]

To: iconoclast
Ditto for yours.
664 posted on 04/04/2004 12:11:50 PM PDT by Cronos (W2K4!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 663 | View Replies]

To: Cronos
You are right in the particular, but wrong, wrong, wrong in your conclusion. These events did take place in different time frames, SO WHAT! they clearly show the Chinese were determined to be in control of their own cultural development. They demonstrate this fact time and time again over a history that is thousands of years old. Interesting that you think it is fine for Isreal to build a wall(I do too) and you stubbornly refuse to admit what is obvious to everyone about Chinese history, and at the same time you think it is wrong for Euro-Americans to have perfectly normal protective feelings about their culture. Exactly the ridiculous double standard I have been talking about.
665 posted on 04/04/2004 12:12:57 PM PDT by ronnieb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 649 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy
(laughing as I'm reading post #613)
666 posted on 04/04/2004 12:16:49 PM PDT by janetgreen (President Bush, stop pandering to Mexico, enforce immigration law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 613 | View Replies]

To: All
The Melting pot has gone cold -
667 posted on 04/04/2004 12:18:23 PM PDT by SealSeven
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 665 | View Replies]

To: Cronos
CAucasian is a race, Anglo-Saxon/American is a culture and America is a civilisation distinct from the English civilisation (similar but distinct) as is French etc.

Maybe you're STARTING to get it (just starting).

Now try to digest this: our civilization is MUCH closer to England than to France.

Nes pas?

668 posted on 04/04/2004 12:21:03 PM PDT by iconoclast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 652 | View Replies]

To: ronnieb
It is not racist to discuss or be concerned about preserving one's culture.

Thank you! There are several people on this thread who do not agree with that, but they're wrong.

669 posted on 04/04/2004 12:23:14 PM PDT by janetgreen (President Bush, stop pandering to Mexico, enforce immigration law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 636 | View Replies]

To: janetgreen
Good post Janet. Take over, I'm starting to get tired.
670 posted on 04/04/2004 12:26:57 PM PDT by iconoclast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 669 | View Replies]

To: iconoclast
Maybe you're STARTING to get it (just starting).

Err... I've just reiterated what I've been saying all along. Vous comprenez maintenant?
671 posted on 04/04/2004 12:27:24 PM PDT by Cronos (W2K4!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 668 | View Replies]

To: MegaSilver
Close the door to all immigration. Maybe allow more Swedish bikini team members, but that's it.
672 posted on 04/04/2004 12:28:56 PM PDT by petercooper (It's obvious, common sense is not prerequisite to voting rights.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ronnieb
Euro-Americans?
673 posted on 04/04/2004 12:29:22 PM PDT by cyborg (Frankenfreude radio death watch has commenced)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 665 | View Replies]

To: William Terrell
The latinos we refer to mostly come from Mexico which are related to South American peoples, not Spanish,

That must be why they mostly have names like Rodrigues, Cardones, Gonzales, and so forth. The Spanish conquered what is now Mexico first, although not by all that much. The old Spanish Colonial cities of St. Petersburg (FL, USA), San Juan (Puerto Rico, USA), Campeche (Campeche MX), and Barranquilla (Columbia) have much in common. They are/were all walled cities. The walls designed to keep out the pirates (who were often English). Campeche calls their baseball team "The Pirates" (Los Piratas).

The Mexicans are not related to South American peoples, except in so far as they share Spanish ancestry, and Amerind ancestry, although the Amerind ancestors represents a large diversity of cultures. (Aztec, Maya, Inca, and many others)

674 posted on 04/04/2004 12:29:29 PM PDT by El Gato (Federal Judges can twist the Constitution into anything.. Or so they think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 276 | View Replies]

To: ronnieb
you stubbornly refuse to admit what is obvious to everyone about Chinese history,

I say that the wall was not built to stop immigrants but for defence. The building of the wall and China's closing off from the world are different issues.
675 posted on 04/04/2004 12:29:29 PM PDT by Cronos (W2K4!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 665 | View Replies]

To: Cronos
I do. Are your SURE you do?
676 posted on 04/04/2004 12:30:47 PM PDT by iconoclast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 671 | View Replies]

To: ronnieb
What is American culture BTW? I am still trying to figure that out.
677 posted on 04/04/2004 12:32:05 PM PDT by cyborg (Frankenfreude radio death watch has commenced)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 665 | View Replies]

To: MegaSilver
Well, then, count this as a smear effort by the papers.

And what else is new?

678 posted on 04/04/2004 12:33:22 PM PDT by iconoclast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 620 | View Replies]

To: bonfire
who WAS Clinton's father?

Most probably Mr. Blythe, of Grayson county, Texas. But maybe not the Mr. Blythe who was married to his mother and killed in a car wreck before he was born. (the Arkanicides may have started really early? His mother was an Arkie ). His father may have been that Mr. Blythe's married brother.

679 posted on 04/04/2004 12:34:10 PM PDT by El Gato (Federal Judges can twist the Constitution into anything.. Or so they think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 293 | View Replies]

To: Cronos
I say that the wall was not built to stop immigrants but for defence

And just maybe for the defense of their culture? A country has the right to do that when their country is being invaded by a foreign nation, just like America is.

680 posted on 04/04/2004 12:35:44 PM PDT by janetgreen (President Bush, stop pandering to Mexico, enforce immigration law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 675 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 641-660661-680681-700 ... 1,021-1,027 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson