Mr. Clarke: If your suspicions are correct, if the "mastermind" of September 11 was also behind the Oklahoma City bombing, would your apologies to the families of the 9-11 victims be extended to cover the families of those killed in the Oklahoma Federal Building?
1 posted on
04/02/2004 7:32:42 AM PST by
Wallaby
To: Wallaby
Great post.
To: All
Don't cry .. The Freepers will save us from John Kerry
|
|
Donate Here By Secure Server
Or mail checks to FreeRepublic , LLC PO BOX 9771 FRESNO, CA 93794
or you can use
PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
|
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD- It is in the breaking news sidebar!
|
To: Wallaby
I completely believe that could be an Iraq connection to OK City bombing. McVeigh was a disgruntled Gulf War I vet. I also think that Saddam would use any mechanism possible to hit the U.S. after his defeat in Gulf War I.
To: Wallaby
our government failed you. Oh yes, that would be when the rats were in power.
To: Wallaby
I still have to wonder. There was a staffed ATF office in the Murrah Federal Building; but for some reason, not one of the ATF employees showed up to work the morning of the bombing.
6 posted on
04/02/2004 7:40:18 AM PST by
Oberon
(What does it take to make government shrink?)
To: Wallaby
Where was he when Clinton declared this domestic terrorism? Why didn't he come out then? Mr. Clarke is a self-serving fool like Robert McNamara IMO!
That said -- I have thought all along that Saddam was involved in Al Qaeda and OKC Bombing. Saddam was involved with all the terrorists in that part of the world and gave safe haven to them along with money.
7 posted on
04/02/2004 7:42:04 AM PST by
PhiKapMom
(AOII Mom -- Support Bush-Cheney '04 -- Losing is not an Option!)
To: Wallaby
This is a theory that is gaining credibility
1) Al Qaeda or Saddam or some combination there of assisted in the OKC bombing.
2) Clinton and Janet Reno got the proof but was squashed. The implication was to great to be made public. If it was made public Clinton would have had no choice but for a true war against terrorism as we are doing today.
3) Ramzi Yousef took refuge in Iraq.
4) Would Terry Nichols or Timothy McVeigh acknowledge the truth? Probably not. In their own sick way they believed they were fighters for their country. They most likely believe that its better to die a martyr for their ilk than to die as a patsy traitor.
4) The bush administration had the truth, but could they make it public? No. If they (the Bush Admin) made it public that the Clinton administration had covered up foreign involvement in an attack on our country, the ramifications could be devastating on the way the executive branch can and could function in the future.
To: Wallaby
The sketch that was put forth in the very early days of the OKC bombing, of a "John Doe" who was seen with McVeigh but never captured, is THE SPITTING IMAGE of Jose Padilla!
16 posted on
04/02/2004 7:59:53 AM PST by
soozla
("Can't we please just all get along?" - Rodney King)
To: Wallaby
And these aren't the same guy?
17 posted on
04/02/2004 8:07:03 AM PST by
MrB
To: Wallaby; dueler88
And while we're at it... IF (per the fringe left moonbat's convenience) you consider Richard Clarke to be remotely credible, then might one consider Iraq to be a legitimate target in the war on Terror. I mean, it is a little hard to make the case that Iraq "posed no threat to the US" nor "ever attacked the US" when there is credible suspicion that Iraqi agents helped mastermind one of two horrendous acts of terrorist mass homicide and destruction on US soil... and perhaps both.
Atos
18 posted on
04/02/2004 8:08:45 AM PST by
Mr.Atos
(If Kerry's the answer... the question will never be asked.)
To: Wallaby
Bookmarked, because I'll never be convinced this wasn't a overly clever shift by Clinton to avoid involving this nation in a WOT, because it would delay his socialist/environmentalist agenda. Plus he HAD to STOP the rising TIDE of fundamenatlist/constitutionalist conservatism, represented by the CONTRACT WITH AMERICA!!! (which was a reaction to his, and especially his wife's ruthless leftist moves)
Talk about changing the course of history... Wish I'd known about FR, back then... Or maybe it didn't even exist, yet.
23 posted on
04/02/2004 8:26:21 AM PST by
SierraWasp
(Coastal CA seems hell-bent on becoming America's version of France!!!)
To: Wallaby
We know that the Clintoonian Administration never investigated that connection. Why? That would be considered dereliction of duty and Clark should have been fired.
27 posted on
04/02/2004 8:45:47 AM PST by
lilylangtree
(Veni, Vidi, Vici)
To: Wallaby
The jig is up for the 'Rats.
30 posted on
04/02/2004 8:59:08 AM PST by
Enduring Freedom
(Warrior Freepers Rule The Earth)
To: Wallaby
had been in the city of Cebu on the same days. I had been to Cebu years earlier..."No more song about Cebu...needs another verse or two. Audience is standing, and leaving, bye-bye-moo-moo, bye-bye-moo-moo, bye-bye-moo-moo-moo-moo-moo-moo-moo-moo."
37 posted on
04/02/2004 9:51:34 AM PST by
ItsOurTimeNow
("I'll never know how much it cost to see my sin upon that cross.")
To: Wallaby
But I thought the Slickmeister ALWAYS listened to your every word! I'm sure if YOU TRUELY thought this at the time, His Ofalness would NEVER have blamed the VRWC. I therefore believe that YOU, as the EXPERT, were the one to convince Sinkspore to target "right wing" radio and the militias.
So, please Mr. Clark, explain to us again how important you were to the previous administration AND how seriously they took your so called advice . . .
To: Wallaby
Makes perfect sense!
Maybe that's why McVeigh was off-ed so fast, to shut him up for good to protect Clintoon and WOT.
Then again, there was speculation that McVeigh was injected with something that put him to sleep, not kill him, due to the color he turned after the injection, which was a very unusual response. As I remember, "he" was immediately cremated.
HMMM!
50 posted on
04/02/2004 10:47:25 AM PST by
aShepard
To: Ronaldus Magnus
Bumping this old topic because of Janet Napolitano’s recent claim that Timothy McVeigh was involved with “Right Wing Extremist” groups.
56 posted on
04/19/2009 4:11:33 PM PDT by
McGruff
(I guess it all depends upon what the meaning of "bow" is.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson