1 posted on
03/29/2004 10:02:28 AM PST by
Puppage
To: Puppage
not sure she can be forced
2 posted on
03/29/2004 10:04:56 AM PST by
linn37
(Have you hugged your Phlebotomist today?)
To: Puppage
Done. There is certainly a difference of opinion here on FR, but when it comes right down to it, I think Dr. Rice is very savvy and if she is declining, I'll just bet she is right.
3 posted on
03/29/2004 10:06:37 AM PST by
Bahbah
To: Puppage
Appears one can vote more than once.
The question is misleading. She's already testified before the commission, just not in public where she will be used for grandstanding by the Party of Evil.
5 posted on
03/29/2004 10:13:28 AM PST by
My2Cents
("Well...there you go again.")
To: Puppage
Should National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice be forced to testify in public before the 9/11 Commission?
Thank you for participating in our poll. Here are the results so far.
Yes 53%
No 47%
6 posted on
03/29/2004 10:18:08 AM PST by
RJayneJ
To: Puppage
Freeped.
8 posted on
03/29/2004 10:25:55 AM PST by
kennedy
To: Puppage
Proudly voted for Condi!
9 posted on
03/29/2004 10:28:25 AM PST by
eleni121
(Preempt and Prevent---then Destroy)
To: Puppage
The Demorats just want to have a Bush Staff member to embarrass front of TV's across the country. Do you think they would stick to asking about pre and post 911 issues? Dream on if you do. No, but Hell No, is the correct answer.
10 posted on
03/29/2004 10:29:33 AM PST by
wattsup
(wattsup)
To: Puppage
The Demorats just want to have a Bush Staff member to embarrass front of TV's across the country. Do you think they would stick to asking about pre and post 911 issues? Dream on if you do. No, but Hell No, is the correct answer.
11 posted on
03/29/2004 10:29:40 AM PST by
wattsup
(wattsup)
To: Puppage
The Demorats just want to have a Bush Staff member to embarrass in front of TV's across the country. Do you think they would stick to asking about pre and post 911 issues? Dream on if you do. No, but Hell No, is the correct answer.
12 posted on
03/29/2004 10:30:29 AM PST by
wattsup
(wattsup)
To: Puppage
Yes 48%
No 52%
16 posted on
03/29/2004 10:52:34 AM PST by
bmwcyle
(<a href="http://www.johnkerry.com/" target="_blank">miserable failure)
To: Puppage
Should National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice be forced to testify in public before the 9/11 Commission? |
Thank you for participating in our poll. Here are the results so far. |
Yes |
45% |
![](/images/static/gfx/bluebar.gif) ![](/images/static/gfx/yellowbar.gif) |
No |
55% |
![](/images/static/gfx/bluebar.gif) ![](/images/static/gfx/yellowbar.gif) |
|
To: Puppage
Absolutely NOT!
Should National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice be forced to testify in public before the 9/11 Commission?
Thank you for participating in our poll. Here are the results so far.
Yes 46%
No 54%
18 posted on
03/29/2004 11:41:25 AM PST by
lilylangtree
(Veni, Vidi, Vici)
To: Puppage
I've been twirling around an idea that might work for Bush, politically. First, he should continue to assert Executive Privilege concerning Condi Rice. Second, he should make himself available to give unsworn testimony -- and have Condi seated RIGHT NEXT TO HIM -- to underscore the nature of that privilege. This way Bush gets to pull an "Ollie North", Condi comes across looking something like a lawyer in a legal proceeding (whispering in the president's ear offmike), and this Panel of Has-Been's & Nobodys comes off small.
I now that this risks Presidential Stature, but Lincoln did the same thing during the Civil War when he slapped the Committee on the Conduct of the War.
Comments?
19 posted on
03/29/2004 12:28:15 PM PST by
Tallguy
(Cannot rate this Reserve Freepers fitness: Not observed on this thread.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson