1 posted on
03/28/2004 2:11:32 AM PST by
sopwith
To: sopwith
Kerry is sounding more and more like Gore -- telling tall tales every day.
2 posted on
03/28/2004 2:14:03 AM PST by
Elkiejg
(Clintons and Democrats have ruined America)
To: sopwith
He isn't even as adept as Gore! And that's a damning charge.
3 posted on
03/28/2004 2:17:13 AM PST by
lainde
(Heads up...We're coming and we've got tongue blades!!)
To: sopwith
"The paper also reported that Kerry claimed to have flown to Paris and “talked with both delegations at the peace talks".
IIRC, the "both" delegations Kerry talked with in Paris were the North Vietnamese and the Viet Cong, not the government of South Vietnam.
5 posted on
03/28/2004 3:58:19 AM PST by
wingman1
(University of Vietnam '70)
To: sopwith
More I vote for it, but then I voted against it. FLIP FLOP
6 posted on
03/28/2004 4:16:21 AM PST by
GailA
(Kerry I'm for the death penalty for terrorist, but I'll declare a moratorium on the death penalty)
To: sopwith; marron
Valor can be defined as putting your blood where your mouth is. Even "putting your money where your mouth is" is not so clearly the antithesis of cheap talk as valor is. Since journalism is the mass production of talk, journalism is naturally inclined toward cheap talk. Cheap talk - the advocacy of easy fixes at the expense of the intergenerational long run - defines liberalism in general and the anti-valor ("antiwar") movement in particular. That is why liberalism, and why the anti-valor project, emanates from journalism.
Apart from that understanding it is impossible for a conservative to understand how, after smearing the US troops in Vietnam, Senator Kerry has gotten as far as he has politically.
If journalism can install Kerry in the WH . . . perish the thought.
Why Broadcast Journalism is
Unnecessary and Illegitimate
11 posted on
03/28/2004 6:20:31 AM PST by
conservatism_IS_compassion
(No one is more subjective than the person who believes in his own objectivity.)
To: sopwith
BACK IN 1971, John Kerry said that 200,000 Vietnamese a year were “murdered by the United States of America.” Now he says he didn’t mean “murdered” and wasn’t referring to U.S. soldiers. Well then, what in the world did he mean?
Be sure to tune in again next week. Different time. Different Channel. Different story!
12 posted on
03/28/2004 6:35:17 AM PST by
Fiddlstix
(This Space Available for Rent or Lease by the Day, Week, or Month. Reasonable Rates. Inquire within.)
To: lepton
bookmark bump
13 posted on
03/28/2004 6:39:03 AM PST by
lepton
To: lepton
bookmark bump
14 posted on
03/28/2004 6:39:07 AM PST by
lepton
To: sopwith
He does not know what he means, so I wish people would quit confusing him.
15 posted on
03/28/2004 6:40:21 AM PST by
Piquaboy
To: sopwith
So did Kerry commit perjury in 1971, or is he lying now? (Or should that be "and/or"?)
18 posted on
03/28/2004 10:04:28 AM PST by
thoughtomator
(Voting Bush because there is no reasonable alternative)
To: sopwith
Although the sentence sound clear to normal people, Kerry appeared to be resorting to Clintonese. It depends on the definition of "murdered," "United States of America," "200,000" and "Vietnamese."
Will he claim that he meant Vietnamese bugs, not people?
21 posted on
03/28/2004 12:21:18 PM PST by
Dante3
To: sopwith
Al Gore invented John Kerry.
22 posted on
03/28/2004 12:22:56 PM PST by
Tall_Texan
(The War on Terror is mere collateral damage to the Democrats' War on Bush.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson