Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kerry's Inner Dove (EXCELLENT editorial, lot of facts!)
Washington Post ^ | Feb. 23, 2004 | Joshua Muravchik

Posted on 02/22/2004 10:10:29 PM PST by FairOpinion

With Vietnam war hero John Kerry having turned back the challenge from antiwar candidate Howard Dean, and George Bush scrambling to account for all his time in the National Guard, the Democrats seem well positioned to neutralize the traditional Republican advantage on foreign policy. But George McGovern also could boast that he was "a decorated combat pilot in World War II," while his opponent "was stationed far from battle," and McGovern nonetheless lost 49 states, largely because the voters thought him weak on national security. Kerry may not project a similar image of weakness, but the record he has compiled in the three decades since he left Vietnam is more dovish than that of any Democratic nominee since McGovern.

The litany of weapons systems that Kerry opposed included conventional as well as nuclear equipment: the B-1 bomber, the B-2, the F-15, the F-14A, the F-14D, the AH-64 Apache helicopter, the AV-8B Harrier jet, the Patriot missile, the Aegis air-defense cruiser and the Trident missile. And he sought to reduce procurement of the M1 Abrams tank, the Bradley Fighting Vehicle, the Tomahawk cruise missile and the F-16 jet. Time and again, Kerry fought against what he called "the military-industrial corporate welfare complex that has relentlessly chewed up taxpayers' dollars."

Kerry was one of the Senate's strongest critics of President Ronald Reagan's policies of military resistance to Communist inroads in this hemisphere.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2004; defensecuts; defensespending; homelandinsecurity; kerry; kerryrecord; unfit
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

1 posted on 02/22/2004 10:10:29 PM PST by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Destro
You might like this one.
2 posted on 02/22/2004 10:12:35 PM PST by FairOpinion (If you are not voting for Bush, you are voting for the terrorists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
And I thank G-d each and every day that Kerry and his ilk has been on the loosing end of those votes...If Kerry had his way, there would still be a Soviet Union...Gulf War 1 would not have been possible, because the weapons systems would not exist...same for Afghanistan...and Iraq...we'd all be subjects of the UN by now if Kerry had his way...
3 posted on 02/22/2004 10:15:04 PM PST by Keith in Iowa (<a href="http://moveon.org" target="blank">Communist front group</a>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

 

 

SENATOR KERRY FOUGHT TO SLASH INTELLIGENCE FUNDING BY AT LEAST $2.5 BILLION

1995: Proposed Bill Cutting $1.5 Billion From Intelligence Budget. Kerry
introduced a bill that would “reduce the Intelligence budget by $300 million in
each of fiscal years 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, and 2000.” There were no
cosponsors of Kerry’s bill, which never made it to the floor for a vote.
(S.1290, Introduced 9/29/95)

1995: Voted To Slash FBI Funding By $80 Million.

(H.R. 2076, CQ Vote #480:
Adopted 49-41: R 9-40; D 40-1, 9/29/95, Kerry Voted Yea)

1994: Proposed Bill To Gut $1 Billion From Intelligence And Freeze Spending For
Two Major Intelligence Programs.
Kerry proposed a bill cutting $1 billion from
the budgets of the National Foreign Intelligence Program and from Tactical
Intelligence, and freezing their budgets.

The bill did not make it to a vote,but the language was later submitted (and defeated – see below) as S. Amdt. 1452 to H.R. 3759.
(S. 1826, Introduced 2/3/94)

1997: Kerry Questioned Growth Of Intelligence Community After Cold War. “Now
that that [Cold War] struggle is over, why is it that our vast intelligence
apparatus continues to grow even as Government resources for new and essential
priorities fall far short of what is necessary?

…” (Senator John Kerry Agreeing
That Critic's Concerns Be Addressed, Congressional Record, 5/1/97, p. S3891)

When His Bill Stalled In Committee, Kerry Proposed $1 Billion Cut As
Amendment Instead.
Kerry proposed cutting $1 billion from the National Foreign
Intelligence Program and Tactical Intelligence budgets, and freezing their
budgets.
The amendment was defeated, with even Graham, Lieberman and Braun
voting against Kerry.
(Amdt.. To H.R. 3759, CQ Vote #39:
Rejected 20-75: R 3-37; D 17-38, 2/10/94, Kerry Voted Yea;
Graham, Lieberman And Braun Voted Nay)
 

After all the above, he has the nerve to say this, after 9/11

12 Days After 9/11: Kerry Questioned Quality Of Intelligence.
“And the tragedy
is, at the moment, that the single most important weapon for the United States
of America is intelligence. … And we are weakest, frankly, in that particular
area. So it’s going to take us time to be able to build up here to do this
properly.”
(CBS’s “Face The Nation,” 9/23/01)

SEN. KERRY’S DEFENSE STRATEGY: CUT CRITICAL WEAPONS SYSTEMS

In 1996, Introduced Bill To Slash Defense Department Funding By $6.5 Billion.
Kerry’s bill had no co-sponsors and never came to a floor vote.
S. 1580, Introduced 2/29/96;

In 1995, Voted To Freeze Defense Spending For 7 Years, Slashing Over $34 Billion
From Defense. Only 27 other Senators voted with Kerry.

Fiscal 1996 Budget Resolution – Defense Freeze. “Harkin, D-Iowa,
amendment to freeze defense spending for the next seven years and transfer the
$34.8 billion in savings to education and job training.”

S. Con. Res. 13, CQ Vote #181:
Rejected 28-71: R 2-51; D 26-20, 5/24/95, Kerry Voted Yea

In 1993, Introduced Plan To Cut Numerous Defense Programs, Including:

 Cut the number of Navy submarines and their crews
 Reduce the number of light infantry units in the Army down to one
 Reduce tactical fighter wings in the Air Force
 Terminate the Navy’s coastal mine-hunting ship program
 Force the retirement of no less than 60,000 members of the Armed Forces in one year.
S.1163, Introduced 6/24/93

Has Voted Repeatedly To Cut Defense Spending, Including:

 In 1993, Voted Against Increased Defense Spending For Military Pay
Raise. Kerry voted to kill an increase in military pay over five years.

S. Con.Res. 18, CQ Vote #73:
Motion Agreed To 55-42: R 2-39; D 53-3, 3/24/93, Kerry Voted Yea

 In 1992, Voted To Cut $6 Billion From Defense. Republicans and Democrats
successfully blocked the attempt to cut defense spending.

S.Con. Res. 106, CQ Vote #73:
Motion Agreed To 53-40: R 38-1; D 15-39, 4/9/92, Kerry Voted Nay

 In 1991, Voted To Slash Over $3 Billion From Defense, Shift Money To
Social Programs. Only 27 Senators joined Kerry in voting for the defense cut.

H.R. 2707, CQ Vote #182:
Motion Rejected 28-69: R 3-39; D 25-30, 9/10/91, Kerry Voted Yea

 In 1991, Voted To Cut Defense Spending By 2%. Only 21 other Senators voted with Kerry, and the defense cut was defeated.

S. Con. Res. 29, CQ Vote #49:
Motion Rejected 22-73: R 1-39; D 21-34, 4/25/91, Kerry Voted Yea

Has Voted Repeatedly To Cut Or Eliminate Funding For B-2 Stealth Bomber.

H.R. 3072, CQ Vote #203:
Rejected 29-71: R 2-43; D 27-28, 9/26/89, Kerry Voted Yea;

H.R. 3072, CQ Vote #310:
Rejected 29-68: R 3-41; D 26-27, 11/18/89, Kerry Voted Yea;

S. 2884, CQ Vote #208:
Rejected 43-56: R 8-36; D 35-20, 8/2/90, Kerry Voted Yea;

S. 2884, CQ Vote #209:
Rejected 45-53: R 9-34; D 36-19, 8/2/90, Kerry Voted Yea;

S. 1507, CQ Vote #174:
Rejected 42-57: R 7-36; D 35-21, 8/1/91, Kerry Voted Yea;

H.R. 2521, CQ Vote #206:
Motion Agreed To 51-48: R 36-7; D 15-41, 9/25/91, Kerry Voted Nay;

S. 2403, CQ Vote #85:
Adopted 61-38: R 7-36; D 54-2, 5/6/92, Kerry Voted Yea;

S. 3114, CQ Vote #216:
Rejected 45-53: R 8-35; D 37-18, 9/18/92, Kerry Voted Yea;

S. 2182, CQ Vote #179:
Rejected 45-55: R 8-36; D 37-19, 7/1/94, Kerry Voted Yea

Has Voted Repeatedly Against Missile Defense.

S. 1507, CQ Vote #171:
Motion Agreed To 60-38: R 40-3; D 20-35, 8/1/91, Kerry Voted Nay;

S. 1507, CQ Vote #173:
Rejected 46-52: R 5-38; D 41-14, 8/1/91, Kerry Voted Yea;

H.R. 2521, CQ Vote #207:
Motion Agreed To 50-49: R 38-5; D 12-44, 9/25/91, Kerry Voted Nay;

S.2403, CQ Vote #85:
Adopted 61-38: R 7-36; D 54-2, 5/6/92, Kerry Voted Yea;

S.3114, CQ Vote #182:
Rejected 43-49: R 34-5; D 9-44, 8/7/92, Kerry Voted Nay;

S.3114, CQ Vote #214:
Rejected 48-50: R 5-38; D 43-12, 9/17/92, Kerry Voted Yea;

S. 3114, CQ Vote #215:
Adopted 52-46: R 39-4; D 13-42, 9/17/92, Kerry Voted Nay;

S. 1298, CQ Vote #251:
Adopted 50-48: R 6-36; D 44-12, 10/9/93, Kerry Voted Yea;

S. Con. Res. 63, CQ Vote #64:
Rejected 40-59: R 2-42; D 38-17, 3/22/94, Kerry Voted Yea;

S. 1026, CQ Vote #354:
Motion Agreed To 51-48: R 47-6; D 4-42, 8/3/95, Kerry Voted Nay;

S. 1087, CQ Vote #384:
Rejected 45-54: R 5-49; D 40-5, 8/10/95, Kerry Voted Yea;

S. 1745, CQ Vote #160:
Rejected 44-53: R 4-49; D 40-4, 6/19/96, Kerry Voted Yea;

S. 1507, CQ Vote #168:
Rejected 39-60: R 4-39; D 35-21, 7/31/91, Kerry Voted Yea;

S. 1507, CQ Vote #172:
Motion Agreed To 64-34: R 39-4; D 25-30, 8/1/91, Kerry Voted Nay;

S. 1873, CQ Vote #131:
Rejected 59-41: R 55-0; D 4-41; I 0-0, 5/13/98, Kerry Voted Nay;

S. 1873, CQ Vote #262:
Rejected 59-41: R 55-0; D 4-41, 9/9/98, Kerry Voted Nay;

S 1635, CQ Vote #157:
Rejected 53-46: R 52-0; D 1-46, 6/4/96, Kerry Voted Nay;

S. 2549, CQ Vote #178:
Motion Agreed To 52-48: R 52-3; D 0-45, 7/13/00, Kerry Voted Nay

KERRY OPPOSED WEAPONS CRITICAL TO RECENT MILITARY SUCCESSES

Running For Senate In 1984, Kerry Promised Massive Defense Cuts. “Kerry in 1984
said he would have voted to cancel … the B-1 bomber, B-2 stealth bomber, AH-64
Apache helicopter, Patriot missile, the F-15, F-14A and F-14D jets, the AV-8B
Harrier jet, the Aegis air-defense cruiser, and the Trident missile system. He
also advocated reductions in many other systems, such as the M1 Abrams tank, the
Bradley Fighting Vehicle, the Tomahawk cruise missile, and the F-16 jet.”
(Brian C. Mooney, “Taking One Prize, Then A Bigger One,” The Boston Globe, 6/19/03)

Weapons Kerry Sought To Phase Out Were Vital In Iraq. “[K]erry supported
cancellation of a host of weapons systems that have become the basis of US
military might -- the high-tech munitions and delivery systems on display to the
world as they leveled the Iraqi regime of Saddam Hussein in a matter of weeks.”
(Brian C. Mooney, “Taking One Prize, Then A Bigger One,” The Boston Globe,
6/19/03)

 F-16 Fighting Falcons. “The Air Force would also play an important role
in strikes against high-ranking officials of the Ba’ath regime. On April 4, two
Air Force F-16 Fighting Falcons dropped laser-guided munitions on the house of
Ali Hassan al-Majid, a.k.a. ‘Chemical Ali,’ in Basra.”
(Abraham Genauer,“Technology And Volume Of Sorties Overwhelmed The Iraqis’ Defenses,” The Hill, 5/21/03)

 B-1Bs B-2As F-15 And F-16s. “On the night of March 21 alone, the first
of ‘shock and awe,’ coalition air forces flew nearly 2,000 missions. … Involved
were Air Force B-1B Lancers, B-2A Spirits, … F-15E Strike Eagles and F-16
Fighting Falcons…”
(Abraham Genauer, “Technology And Volume Of Sorties Overwhelmed The Iraqis’ Defenses,” The Hill, 5/21/03)

 M1 Abrams. “‘[M1 Abrams] tanks were the sledgehammer in this war,’ added
Pat Garrett, an associate analyst with GlobalSecurity.org. ‘The tank was the
tool that allowed [the ground forces] to progress as fast as they did.’”
(Patrick O’Connor, “Revolutionary Tank Tactics Alter Iraqi Conflict, Future Of Urban Warfare,” The Hill, 5/21/03)

 Patriot Missile. “U.S. Central Command says the Patriots … have improved
to the point where they intercepted nine of the Iraqis’ short-range al-Samoud 2
and Ababil-100 missiles in this conflict.”
(Andrea Stone, “Patriot Missile: Friend Or Foe To Allied Troops?” USA Today, 4/15/03)

 AH-64 Apache Helicopter. “Recently, Apaches in Afghanistan achieved
success directly supporting ground troops. … Whether in shaping the battle in a
combined arms Warfighter-type fight where intelligence of the enemy is known, or
by conducting close combat attacks in direct support of a ground commander, the
Longbow Apache provides significantly increased flexibility and firepower for
U.S. Army forces …”
(Maj. David J. Rude and Lt. Col. Daniel E. Williams, “The ‘Warfighter Mindset’ and the War in Iraq,” Army Magazine, 7/03)

 Tomahawk Cruise Missile. “The first operational use [of Tomahawk cruise
missiles] was in Operation Desert Storm, 1991, with immense success. The missile
has since been used successfully in several other conflicts … include[ing]
Bosnia … in 1995 and in Iraq again … in 1996 … [and in] strikes against training
camps run by Osama Bin Laden’s al-Qaeda network in Afghanistan in 1998. Cruise
missiles were also fired during the air campaign over Kosovo in 1999.”
(Vivek Rai, “Cruise Missiles, By Air And Sea,” MSNBC.com, Accessed 7/17/03)

 Aegis Air-Defense Cruiser. “During Operation Iraqi Freedom, [the Aegis
cruiser] Bunker Hill … was one of the first warships to conduct Tomahawk strikes
against leadership targets in Iraq. The ship launched a total of 31 missiles
during the war. Its embarked … helicopter detachment … supported the rescue of
United Nations workers being forcibly removed from oil platforms in the Northern
Arabian Gulf and provided medical evacuations from the Iraqi city of Umm Qasr.”
(S.A. Thornbloom, “USS Bunker Hill Makes Revolutionary Return,” NavyDispatch.com, Accessed 7/17/03)

During 1980s, Kerry And Michael Dukakis Joined Forces With Liberal Group
Dedicated To Slashing Defense. Kerry sat on the board of “Jobs With Peace
Campaign,” which sought to “develop public support for cutting the defense budget…”
(“Pentagon Demonstrators Call For Home-Building, Not Bombs,” The Associated Press, 6/3/88)

Running For Congress In 1972, Kerry Promised To Cut Defense Spending. “On what
he’ll do if he’s elected to Congress, Kerry said he would ‘bring a different
kind of message to the president.’ He said he would vote against military
appropriations.”
(“Candidate’s For Congress Capture Campus In Andover,” Lawrence [MA] Eagle-Tribune, 4/21/72)
 


4 posted on 02/22/2004 10:17:01 PM PST by SAMWolf (Contrary to popular belief Hamas has nothing to do with ham. If you throw ham at them they get angry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SAMWolf
Excellent collection. From this article:

"When he won election to the Senate in 1984, Kerry said that the "issue of war and peace" remained his "passion." As a first major foreign policy cause, he championed the "nuclear freeze." Later Kerry battled Sen. Sam Nunn, a hawkish Democrat who chaired the Armed Services Committee, over the funding of research into missile defense, which Kerry wanted to slash."
5 posted on 02/22/2004 10:20:32 PM PST by FairOpinion (If you are not voting for Bush, you are voting for the terrorists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Keith in Iowa
Kerry would leave the US defenseless, and wouldn't move a finger in defense, unless Kofi Annan allowed him.

Is this the kind of president we want during such critical times, a time of war for our very survival?
6 posted on 02/22/2004 10:21:47 PM PST by FairOpinion (If you are not voting for Bush, you are voting for the terrorists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
[With Vietnam war hero John Kerry having turned back the challenge from antiwar candidate Howard Dean, and George Bush scrambling to account for all his time in the National Guard, the Democrats seem well positioned to neutralize the traditional Republican advantage on foreign policy.]

The opening line is typical liberal hubris. I will be gloating when GW shows them their place in 2004.

7 posted on 02/22/2004 10:23:21 PM PST by Mad_Tom_Rackham (Any day you wake up is a good day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg
read later
8 posted on 02/22/2004 10:23:45 PM PST by nutmeg (Why vote for Bush? Imagine Commander in Chief John F'in Kerry!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
fight smart.
9 posted on 02/22/2004 10:24:22 PM PST by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting www.johnathangaltfilms.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
Damn. About 10 days too soon for the Post to publish this. Let Kerry win the next round of primaries and then take him apart. Rather have Kerry with his downright dismal record of support for the military to attack in this campaign, than ambulance chaser and Breck Boy Edwards who gives a good speech, but has no record to speak of. Of course, the Post may just be trying to spike interest in the Rat's races now that they are almost finished.
10 posted on 02/22/2004 10:25:57 PM PST by CedarDave (Waiting too long to bail the boat greatly increases the chance of sinking [Bush campaign silence])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave
Damn. About 10 days too soon for the Post to publish this. Let Kerry win the next round of primaries and then take him apart. Rather have Kerry with his downright dismal record of support for the military to attack in this campaign, than ambulance chaser and Breck Boy Edwards who gives a good speech, but has no record to speak of.

Exactly

11 posted on 02/22/2004 10:26:57 PM PST by Mo1 (" Do you want a president who injects poison into his skull for vanity?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SAMWolf
My goodness Sam, that's a valuable piece of research you've got there. I'm going to have to bookmark this thread.
12 posted on 02/22/2004 10:28:50 PM PST by McGavin999 (Evil thrives when good men do nothing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SAMWolf
Thanks for the information!
13 posted on 02/22/2004 10:46:16 PM PST by JimSEA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
Is this the kind of president we want during such critical times, a time of war for our very survival?

No, indeed. In fact, I would not want this kind of president at any time.

14 posted on 02/22/2004 11:03:09 PM PST by skr (Pro-life from cradle to grave)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: McGavin999; JimSEA
Found it on a web Site but there's no author's attributed to it. All I did was re-format it so it's a little more readable.
15 posted on 02/22/2004 11:04:43 PM PST by SAMWolf (Contrary to popular belief Hamas has nothing to do with ham. If you throw ham at them they get angry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SAMWolf
The RNC website also has a lot of info about both Kerr and Edwards. But I think yours was more comprehensive and easier to read.

Who is John Kerry?
http://www.rnc.org/RNCResearch/Read.aspx?ID=3412

Who is John Edwards?
http://www.gop.com/RNCResearch/Read.aspx?ID=3523
16 posted on 02/22/2004 11:11:10 PM PST by FairOpinion (If you are not voting for Bush, you are voting for the terrorists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
From the article:

Time and again, Kerry fought against what he called "the military-industrial corporate welfare complex that has relentlessly chewed up taxpayers' dollars."

We aren't supposed to point out these truths about Kerry's record because by doing so, according to Kerry, we are accusing him of being unpatriotic causing him to pitch his usual hissy fits.

17 posted on 02/22/2004 11:16:42 PM PST by hotpotato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
That "fine print" is hard on my old eyes. :-)

Lots more info on that site though.
18 posted on 02/22/2004 11:18:48 PM PST by SAMWolf (Contrary to popular belief Hamas has nothing to do with ham. If you throw ham at them they get angry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: SAMWolf
bump
19 posted on 02/22/2004 11:22:27 PM PST by SeeRushToldU_So (I was winning the pool on the Super Bowl for 3.5 minutes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SeeRushToldU_So
An excellent reference about Kerry on defense just posted:

KERRY'S DEFENSE STRATEGY: CUT CRITICAL WEAPONS SYSTEMS
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1083528/posts
20 posted on 02/22/2004 11:25:14 PM PST by FairOpinion (If you are not voting for Bush, you are voting for the terrorists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson