Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

California Governor Urged to Arrest Mayor of San Francisco
Agape Press ^ | 1/16/04 | Fred Jackson, Allie Martin, and Jody Brown

Posted on 02/16/2004 2:05:54 PM PST by truthandlife

A Christian law firm is calling for the arrest of the mayor of San Francisco in the wake of his decision last week that has resulted in hundreds of same-sex marriage licenses being issued. Despite the threat of that lawsuit, the City by the Bay continued throughout the weekend to grant licenses to homosexual couples who waited in long lines.

Steve Crampton, a spokesman for the American Family Association Center for Law & Policy (CLP), calls Mayor Gavin Newsom's move "an arrogant stunt [that] proves the radical homosexual movement will trample the rights of all who stand in their way."

Newsom started handing out marriage licenses to homosexuals on Thursday in the midst of the debate on homosexual "marriage" in Massachusetts. According to the mayor, California's law banning same-sex marriage amounts to discrimination -- and he is ready to go to court to make his point.

Crampton believes the mayor's action demonstrates that "even criminal law and the constitution of the State of California are no barrier to radical homosexuals attempting to force their agenda on the rest of the nation."

On Friday the CLP sent letters to the governor and attorney general of California and to the San Francisco city attorney, calling for Newsom's arrest and removal from office. Those letters state that it is "patently unlawful" in California to issue marriage certificates to same-sex couples, citing the specific portion of the California Family Code being violated. But the CLP's letters do not stop there.

"Mayor Gavin not only acted in violation of the civil law, he apparently violated the criminal law as well," the letters state. "California Penal Code section 115 prohibits the knowing procurement of any false or forged instrument to be filed or recorded in any public office, making such an act a felony punishable by up to three (3) years in prison. Since Mayor Newsom has procured approximately 96 such false certificates as of yesterday [Thursday], he may face up to 288 years in prison."

The potential penalty has increased substantially since those letters were written. Associated Press reports that the city hall offices in San Francisco remained open over the weekend and experienced brisk business from homosexual couples. According to AP, more than 1,700 marriage licenses have now been issued -- and that the demand was so high that authorities had to turn away hundreds of waiting "couples" on Sunday, many of whom had rushed to the Golden State from around the country.

Many of those couples chose to go before city officials, exchange vows, and be declared "spouses for life." Among those were the mayor's chief of staff and policy director, both of whom married their long-time "partners" with Newsom himself officiating.

Pro-family activist Gary Bauer says Newsom's action has created "yet another constitutional crises with respect to marriage" -- a direct reference to events last week in Massachusetts. "But this time instead of activist judges rewriting the law, renegade municipal officials are flagrantly violating the law and ignoring the will of the people," he says. In March 2000, more than 60 percent of California voters approved Proposition 22, the Defense of Marriage Act in that state.

Bauer says it remains to be seen what Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger will do. "[Thursday's] actions by a radical sexual minority and their liberal sympathizers are direct assaults upon the rule of law and the institution of marriage," he says. "Will Governor Schwarzenegger act to impeach the mayor and county clerk? Will he issue executive orders rescinding the phony 'marriage' licenses?

"It's time to see just how tough Arnold really is," Bauer says.

No Court Hearing Till Tuesday Meanwhile, the president of Liberty Counsel describes Newsom's decision to issue marriage licenses to homosexual couples as "a reprehensible abuse of power." Mat Staver's group has filed a lawsuit in San Francisco, claiming the mayor's actions are void and unconstitutional -- and ridiculous.

"This particular mayor [Newsom] has a radical homosexual agenda to push," Staver says. "Back in 1998, this same mayor issued a resolution that said that pro-family groups that say homosexuality is wrong or is a choice [constitutes] hate speech and ought to be prohibited. This [recent action] is simply ridiculous, and he's engaging in illegal acts that we intend to stop."

The lawsuit, filed by Liberty Counsel on behalf of the Campaign for California Families, was filed Friday morning in San Francisco Superior Court but, because of the Presidents' Day holiday, will not be heard until Tuesday morning. In contrast, the County Clerk's office remained open on Monday, staffed by employees volunteering their time, to accommodate the demand for same-sex marriage licenses.

Randy Thomasson, executive director of CCF, says the city's open defiance of state law and "trashing" of traditional marriage is getting the attention of people across the globe.

"Parents and grandparents are shocked at seeing these counterfeit marriages being paraded on TV," Thomasson says. He adds that his group is looking forward to the citizens of California having their day in court on Tuesday to protect marriage for a man and a women -- as they did when they passed Proposition 22 in 2000.

Across the nation in Charlotte, North Carolina, a black pastor from Detroit told the National Religious Broadcasters convention that most black and white churches agree that homosexual marriage is wrong. Glenn Plummer, who is also the NRB's chairman, says the organization want to help black and white Christians unite in bringing the nation "back in line" so that "one man and one woman are man and wife in a marriage."

Also speaking at the NRB convention, Christian broadcaster Warren Duffy told his colleagues that the hustle and bustle surrounding the issuance of marriage licenses for same-sex couples in San Francisco makes it seem like a "different country" -- one he jokingly calls "the people's union of soviet socialists of northern California."


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; US: California
KEYWORDS: arrest; gavinnewsom; homosexual; homosexualagenda; homosexuality; lawbreakers; marriage; mayor; prisoners; samesexmarriage; sanfrancisco; sanfransisco; schwarzenegger; sf; stunt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 161-172 next last
To: sarasmom
People hardly ever call their local news bureaus and complains, in my experience. When I have done, because of blatantly one sided reporting, or violations of privacy of individuals with their reporting, or salacious reporting or a host of other things that impugn the objectivity of a report, they do seem to respond. Its just when they think people could care less, they let their biases and political agendas run wild.
81 posted on 02/16/2004 6:51:16 PM PST by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: ClintonBeGone
McClintock isn't conservative?
82 posted on 02/16/2004 6:51:26 PM PST by Flashman_at_the_charge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: bluegrass
This mayor is on some kind of an ego trip, doncha think?

I think it is a vendetta against conservatives and specifically GWB. I read on another thread that he had just gotten back from listening to GWB's state of the union where he talked about his opposition to gay marriage. It's a pre-emptive strike imo.

83 posted on 02/16/2004 6:55:09 PM PST by Aliska
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: templar
"California Penal Code section 115...

Kinda hard to argue with that. I would think conspiricy to violate this law might also find an application.

How about a citizen's arrest? I'd fly up to nab this guy!

84 posted on 02/16/2004 7:05:59 PM PST by AnimalLover
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: ClintonBeGone
McClintock was not conservative....

You really think this? What do you base this on??

85 posted on 02/16/2004 7:10:29 PM PST by sangoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer
You might want to reconsider your effectiveness, if all you are going to so is make a phone call to a TV station receptionist.
I worked the phones at an Atlanta, Ga Radio/TV station once upon a time.
Your carefully worded rant got a checkmark in the appropriate audience response form column.
For/against.
Faithfully turned in at the end of the shift.
Unless the deluge of complaint calls about a program change or cable power outage jammed the incoming lines.
Now if you physically took the time and effort to show up in the lobby, it didnt matter how weird your objection seemed, you got to talk to someone besides the switchboard operator.
LOL!


86 posted on 02/16/2004 7:15:21 PM PST by sarasmom (Hanoi Jane admires John F*ing Kerry's military service in Vietnam=things that make you go hmmmm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: stopem
Here is a link to send a email to President Bush on this issue:

http://capwiz.com/afanet/issues/alert/?alertid=4659706&type=PR

87 posted on 02/16/2004 7:20:31 PM PST by stopem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

Comment #88 Removed by Moderator

To: sarasmom
Well I generally call the program director. I have always been put through. Sometimes I talk to the reporter directly. I make them aware that some of us see when they produce a one sided report and help them to see what the other side might be. It hurts their voluminous egos to be called biased, even though they are. I asked to see two sides of the story the next time they do it and generally they grudgingly give time to the other side.

89 posted on 02/16/2004 7:22:57 PM PST by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: sarasmom
How are you going to keep this kind of thing from happening in Florida by the way?

Don't mock California, there are many decent hardworking people here who would like to see equal justice and rule of law returned.
90 posted on 02/16/2004 7:24:25 PM PST by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: truthandlife
It's a FELONY!
91 posted on 02/16/2004 7:26:40 PM PST by John Lenin (Just because there is no draft does not mean there are no draft dodgers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sangoo
You really think this? What do you base this on??

Perhaps the clearest indication was his willingness to help Bustamonte win.

92 posted on 02/16/2004 7:28:56 PM PST by ClintonBeGone (<a href="http://www.freerepublic.com/~clintonbegone/">Hero</font></a>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: chuckwalla; yall
chuckwalla wrote:

Apparently Lockyear was consulted prior to the mayor acting.

So does this mean that the California assault weapons ban is null and void as it is in violation of the U.S. constituiton which is the supreme law of the land.

Lockyear can not enforce it if he does not enforce the law in this case.
But knowing liberals they will pick and choose which laws they follow.


______________________________________


Good point..
Put Arnold's & Lockyears feet to the fire, and watch them squirm..
93 posted on 02/16/2004 7:30:34 PM PST by tpaine (I'm trying to be 'Mr Nice Guy', but the U.S. Constitution defines conservatism; - not the GOP. .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer
California became "mockable" when the off-scouring of the Northern cities began to move here in droves.

Starting in 1849.

94 posted on 02/16/2004 7:31:54 PM PST by muleskinner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: templar
templar wrote:
There are four types of law. Constitutional, Statutory, Administrative, and Judicial.

All forms of law are law.

______________________________________

Not true.
If repugnant to the constitution, the other three forms of 'law' are void.
Obey or enforce unconstitutional law at your own jeopardy.





95 posted on 02/16/2004 7:41:56 PM PST by tpaine (I'm trying to be 'Mr Nice Guy', but the U.S. Constitution defines conservatism; - not the GOP. .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: ClintonBeGone
If you followed McClintock for some time you would KNOW that he is a Conservative. Heck, I wanted Bustamonte to win too. Better to finish off the state and start over, than this slow death with liberal Republicans.
96 posted on 02/16/2004 7:44:49 PM PST by sangoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer
Got guns?
In Florida, you only need a government license or gun registration for concealed carry in public, or exotic weapons permits.
We are fighting even that insane law.
What kind of naive warped mind thinks regulatng physical lethal weapons, guns and knives, will controll the offensive lethal intentions of the criminally bent class?
Call 911, and wait for your taxpayer funded government representative to show up and save you!





97 posted on 02/16/2004 7:48:26 PM PST by sarasmom (Hanoi Jane admires John F*ing Kerry's military service in Vietnam=things that make you go hmmmm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: sangoo
If you followed McClintock for some time you would KNOW that he is a Conservative

No, he's a silly self-serving clown who will never be elected statewide in California.

98 posted on 02/16/2004 7:53:34 PM PST by ClintonBeGone (<a href="http://www.freerepublic.com/~clintonbegone/">Hero</font></a>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: ClintonBeGone
No, he's a silly self-serving clown who will never be elected statewide in California.

Well, you're probably right on the second part....Conservatives rarely get elected statewide in California.

99 posted on 02/16/2004 8:00:10 PM PST by sangoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: sangoo
Hopefully he'll just fade away.
100 posted on 02/16/2004 8:04:29 PM PST by ClintonBeGone (<a href="http://www.freerepublic.com/~clintonbegone/">Hero</font></a>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 161-172 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson