Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

More Gay Weddings Set for San Francisco
ABC News ^ | 14 February 2004 | The Associated Press

Posted on 02/14/2004 1:22:24 PM PST by MegaSilver

SAN FRANCISCO Feb. 14 — Gay and lesbian couples from across the country answered this city's Valentine's Day invitation to wed in an unprecedented spree of same-sex marriages that has challenged California law and sent conservative groups scrambling for court intervention. About 300 people lined up Saturday morning outside City Hall to secure marriage licenses and then take each other as "spouse for life" in brief vows that have given San Francisco's seat of government the feel of a Las Vegas wedding chapel.

Rodney Vonjaeger and his partner John Kussmann, both 37, drove overnight from San Diego and arrived at 3 a.m. Saturday.

"We decided if there was ever an opportunity we would do it, so the drive wasn't even a consideration," Vonjaeger said as he waited in line Saturday. They set the hotel alarm for 8 a.m., "but we were up at 7 because of the excitement."

It was the third straight day that officials issued the licenses to hundreds of gay and lesbian couples. The response has been so overwhelming that nearly 200 city officials, led by newly elected Mayor Gavin Newsom, have volunteered to pitch in, from sheriff's deputies providing security to clerks processing the licenses.

Across the country, other gay couples didn't wait for a marriage license. About three dozen same-sex couples exchanged vows at Philadelphia's LOVE Park on Saturday as part of a "mass commitment ceremony" organized by a gay-friendly church.

Led by a minister, the couples gathered in front of Robert Indiana's famed "LOVE" sculpture a rainbow flag draped under it and repeated their vows.

"If they're not going to let us get married, we're going to do it anyway," said Dan Farley, shortly after exchanging silver rings with his partner, John McCann.

Despite legal challenges from advocates of traditional marriage, San Francisco's wedding march is expected to continue throughout the long holiday weekend.

By late Friday, city authorities had officiated at 665 same-sex weddings in City Hall, and issued still more licenses. City officials said they would welcome license applications on Saturday, Sunday and Monday President's Day to accommodate couples that have flocked here from as far away as New York.

On Friday, a judge denied a petition to block more licenses from being granted. Two separate groups of opponents were asked to return Tuesday for a hearing.

"No one made the mayor of San Francisco king; he can't play God. He cannot trash the vote of the people," Randy Thomasson, director of the Campaign for California Families, said at a news conference in Los Angeles.

Aside from the lawsuits, the newly married couples may face other obstacles. After a marriage license is recorded by county officials, it is sent to the state Office of Vital Records. A ballot initiative approved by voters in 2000 said the state would only recognize marriages between a man and a woman.

San Francisco officials have insisted the licenses they have handed out are legally binding, although they are revised to be "gender-neutral." But a deputy city attorney acknowledged that the state may not accept them.

San Francisco appears to be the first city in the nation to officially support same-sex marriage licenses; city clerks in Arizona and Colorado in 1975 issued licenses to gay and lesbian couples that were later revoked or declared void.

Emboldened by the prospect of the nation's first legal same-sex marriages in Massachusetts, gay couples went to courthouses around the nation Thursday and Friday to demand the right to marry. They were quickly turned away.

The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court recently ruled that it is unconstitutional to bar gay couples from marriage. Under the decision, the nation's first legally sanctioned gay marriages are scheduled to begin in mid-May.

Lawmakers are proposing a constitutional amendment that would define marriage a union between one man and one woman, and the Legislature resumes its deliberations of amendments on March 11.

Some American couples headed to Toronto Saturday, where gay marriage is legal.

"Canada as a country is more accepting and tolerant, we didn't give it a second thought," said Robin Hanson, a St. Louis doctoral student who was marrying her girlfriend Susan Levin.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: civilunion; gavinnewsom; gayagenda; gaysandlesbians; homosexualagenda; marriage; newsom; sanfrancisco; stunt

I must give AP some credit for the above photo, showing it like it is. But, of course, this is what we'd REALLY like to see:

If only we could be so lucky...

1 posted on 02/14/2004 1:22:25 PM PST by MegaSilver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MegaSilver
This is repulsive! One question lad, when lady marries gentlemen usually lady takes last name after gentlemen. Just wonder who takes last name from whom in this scenario. I can not believe this is happening. God have mercy on us all!
2 posted on 02/14/2004 1:38:43 PM PST by gdyniawitawa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MegaSilver
I really love my house. We have lived together for 34 years. I want to marry it, so my insurance will pay for the new roof it needs.

I really love my car. I want to marry it, so my health insurance will fix the transmission. I realize that it won't fix the dents, since that would be elective cosmetic surgery....
3 posted on 02/14/2004 1:41:38 PM PST by MainFrame65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gdyniawitawa
I can not believe this is happening. God have mercy on us all!

Even better, my fiance's brother is gay, and her mother believes that he and his (ahem) "friend" are going to get married in S.F. And, of course, being the open-minded liberal that she is, she's all for it!

My fiance and I are appalled over it, especially since we're getting married at the end of the month, and he'll be selfishly "upstaging" us (as her mother put it gleefully).

It makes me shiver in anger and revulsion.

4 posted on 02/14/2004 1:42:02 PM PST by Future Snake Eater ("Oh boy, I can't wait to eat that monkey!"--Abe Simpson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MegaSilver

5 posted on 02/14/2004 1:45:01 PM PST by ServesURight (FReecerely Yours,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MegaSilver
These deviants are getting "married" in a civil ceremony. What happens when they go to court and want to get a "d-i-v-o-r-c-e"? If the courts don't recognize gay marriage, will they recognize gay divorce? It's the land of fruits & nuts, so who knows.
6 posted on 02/14/2004 1:57:15 PM PST by Rebel-without-a-pause
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gdyniawitawa
Don't know if this is true or not, but I heard that they are listed as applicant #1 and applicant #2 on the "marriage license".

"Do you, applicant #1, take applicant #2..."

Totally bizarre!
7 posted on 02/14/2004 2:03:43 PM PST by Theresawithanh (Tagline? What the heck's a tagline????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: gdyniawitawa
One question lad, when lady marries gentlemen usually lady takes last name after gentlemen. Just wonder who takes last name from whom in this scenario.

In all likelihood, they'd both keep their last names. Hillary actually remained Hillary Rodham after she married Bill--until she realized that she'd have to appear more house-wifeish if Bill were to hope to get a second term.

8 posted on 02/14/2004 2:04:16 PM PST by MegaSilver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MegaSilver
The "family values" Democrats believe in when they're feeling their oats. Don't hold your waiting for a denunciation from the French metrosexual Jean F. Cheri. He's backed by those who want to do more than just come out of the closet.
9 posted on 02/14/2004 4:21:56 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson