Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: thecabal
question on your theory....
why if we caught him in Iran would we be making such an elaborate show to now catch him in Pakistan/Afghanistan border area? Just curious as to what people think about this.
4,669 posted on 02/22/2004 7:28:11 AM PST by knak (wasknaknowknid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4663 | View Replies ]


To: All
Anybody read the raw data at Jill's site? It was updated.
4,670 posted on 02/22/2004 7:31:09 AM PST by knak (wasknaknowknid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4669 | View Replies ]

To: knak; JustPiper; thecabal
Bin Laden 'surrounded'

February 22, 2004

A BRITISH Sunday newspaper is claiming Osama bin Laden has been found and is surrounded by US special forces in an area of land bordering north-west Pakistan and Afghanistan.

The Sunday Express, known for its sometimes colourful scoops, claims the al-Qaeda leader has been "sighted" for the first time since 2001 and is being monitored by satellite.

The paper claims he is in a mountainous area to the north of the Pakistani city of Quetta. The region is said to be peopled with bin Laden supporters and the terrorist leader is estimated to also have 50 of his fanatical bodyguards with him.

The claim is attributed to "a well-placed intelligence source" in Washington, who is quoted as saying: "He (bin Laden) is boxed in."

The paper says the hostile terrain makes an all-out conventional military assault impossible. The plan to capture him would depend on a "grab-him-and-go" style operation.

"US helicopters already sited on the Afghanistan border will swoop in to extricate him," the newspaper says. It claims bin Laden and his men "sleep in caves or out in the open. The area is swept by fierce snow storms howling down from the 10,000ft-high mountain peaks. Donkeys are the only transport."

The special forces are "absolutely confident" there is no escape for bin Laden, and are awaiting the order to go in and get him.

"The timing of that order will ultimately depend on President Bush," the paper says. "Capturing bin Laden will certainly be a huge help for him as he gets ready for the election."

The article says bin Laden's movements are monitored by a National Security Agency satellite.

On Thursday last week, General Richard Myers, chairman of the US joint chiefs of staff, said America had been engaged in "intense" efforts to capture bin Laden, who was believed to be hiding in the border area between Pakistan and Afghanistan.

But he insisted that the focus of the search had not narrowed for months.

The Sunday Telegraph

4,680 posted on 02/22/2004 10:58:17 AM PST by TexKat (Just because you did not see it or read it, that does not mean it did or did not happen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4669 | View Replies ]

To: knak
Why would we capture OBL months earlier and then claim to the media he's been captured months later? OBL would sing like a canary to the Red Cross workers that he's been held for months and the idea that the news was delayed would backfire if used for election purposes. Only if he was brought out dead would that ploy work.
4,686 posted on 02/22/2004 11:33:14 AM PST by MamaDearest (Lets get them before they get us!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4669 | View Replies ]

To: knak
politics.
4,729 posted on 02/22/2004 8:11:48 PM PST by Calpernia (http://members.cox.net/classicweb/Heroes/heroes.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4669 | View Replies ]

To: knak
I think that Sean was right about why we would "find" him in Afghanistan/Pakistan. If it came out that Iran was housing him, we could very well be looking at a global conflagration.
4,825 posted on 02/23/2004 1:45:57 PM PST by thecabal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4669 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson