1 posted on
01/30/2004 5:56:57 PM PST by
ambrose
To: ambrose
Alright, where's the contact info. It's time to start the e-mail campaign. :^D
2 posted on
01/30/2004 5:59:00 PM PST by
Tempest
To: ambrose
They'd rather roll over and die than give it to Bush.
3 posted on
01/30/2004 6:00:40 PM PST by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: ambrose
Feel free to show your support:
Nobel Forum, Box 270, SE-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden
Email:
secr@mednobel.ki.se
4 posted on
01/30/2004 6:00:52 PM PST by
VaBthang4
(-He who watches over Israel neither slumbers nor sleeps-)
To: ambrose
"Even though they haven't found those weapons they got rid of a dictator and made the world more safe," he told Reuters on Friday, sticking by the choice. "They got rid of a madman." Saddam's alleged weapons of mass destruction were a main justification for the war. None have yet been found and Bush's National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice admitted on Thursday some pre-war intelligence was flawed.
Gee...how did I know this was from Reuters without even looking?!? They never miss an opportunity to bash the Bush Administration.
5 posted on
01/30/2004 6:05:13 PM PST by
humboldtconservative
(deport ALL illegals......immediately......)
To: ambrose
Saddam's alleged weapons of mass destruction were a main justification for the war. None have yet been found Uh, sure... just pay no attention to the labs, past history, political prisoners, assassinations of key figures, tools and equipment, precursors, growth media, delivery systems, front companies, mass graves, nuclear scientists, biochemists, and technicians behind the curtain, folks...
7 posted on
01/30/2004 6:13:27 PM PST by
piasa
(Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge.)
To: ambrose
LOL, Considering their last few winners, Michael Moore is probably their pick for this years Nobel Prize
8 posted on
01/30/2004 6:21:43 PM PST by
MJY1288
(WITHOUT DOUBLE STANDARDS, LIBERALS WOULDN'T HAVE ANY !)
To: ambrose
Its tainted by Jimmah Cartah having received it.
To: ambrose
The Nobel prize is so absolutely bogus nowadays, Osama Bin Laden or those two morons who went on the sniping spree that terrorized the east coast are more likely to win the prize than a true hero like GWB!
13 posted on
01/30/2004 7:09:30 PM PST by
Chu Gary
(USN Intel guy 1967 - 1970)
To: ambrose
Jan Simonsen, a right-wing independent member of Norway's parliament Note you well that there are no "left-wingers" quoted in Reuter's articles. Ever! *chuckle*
To: ambrose
No, you won't get left-wingewrs in Reuters reports since the organization uses the ter social democrats.
To: ambrose
IMHO Saddam has a better chance winning this 'leftist's junk' prize than do GW and/or TB.
19 posted on
01/31/2004 7:36:11 AM PST by
PISANO
(God Bless our Troops........They will not TIRE - They will not FALTER - They will not FAIL!!!!!)
To: ambrose
But...but...but, the Clintons were supposed to get it! (Sniffle!)
21 posted on
01/31/2004 6:51:16 PM PST by
Redleg Duke
(tStir the pot...don't let anything settle to the bottom where the lawyers can feed off of it!)
To: ambrose
Any peace award that sits on Arafat's bloodstained shrapnel pocked fireplace mantle is a sham! How did they miss Pol Pot when he was up for the prize??? If they miscount the vote and W gets it he should throw it over the WH fence in protest!! Just another one world socialist debating society.
Pray for W and The Truth
25 posted on
01/31/2004 7:50:00 PM PST by
bray
(The Wicked Witch of NY and Her (9-8) Flying Monkeys are In Flames!)
To: ambrose
Bump for support!
26 posted on
01/31/2004 9:40:06 PM PST by
Salvation
(†With God all things are possible.†)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson