Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

MEL ON THE DEFENSIVE
NY Post ^ | January 30, 2004 | Liz Smith

Posted on 01/30/2004 9:10:59 AM PST by presidio9

Edited on 05/26/2004 5:19:21 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

'YOU'RE GOING to have to go on record. The Holocaust happened, right?" Peggy Noonan asks of Mel Gibson in the Reader's Digest for March. Gibson: "I have friends and parents of friends who have numbers on their arms. The guy who taught me Spanish was a Holocaust survivor. He worked in a concentration camp in France. Yes, of course. Atrocities happened. War is horrible. The Second World War killed tens of millions of people. Some of them were Jews in concentration camps. Many people lost their lives. In the Ukraine, several million starved to death between 1932 and 1933. During the last century, 20 million people died in the Soviet Union."


(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: melgibson; peggynoonan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 421-440441-460461-480481-483 next last
To: SJackson; veronica
So after all this are you 2 going to see this movie and judge for yourselves?
441 posted on 02/02/2004 11:43:13 AM PST by missyme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 439 | View Replies]

To: veronica
But the FACT IS that it was Jews and only Jews who were singled out for total extermination by the Nazis.

Whatever you do, do not mention this to the Romany people. They would be most suprised to hear it!

442 posted on 02/02/2004 11:56:29 AM PST by presidio9 (FREE MARTHA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 431 | View Replies]

To: missyme
Of course I am going to see it and judge for myself.
443 posted on 02/02/2004 11:57:24 AM PST by veronica ("America will never seek a permission slip to defend the security of our people." GW Bush 1-20-04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 441 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Do you know for a fact that there were no Jews wo sold out their own people and helped the Germans.

A tiny minority, some of whom had a boot to the neck. And some of whom tried to save other Jews by doing so. Live or die, that was the choice they faced. And again, this represents very few.

Not exactly a big "gray area" either.

444 posted on 02/02/2004 12:00:02 PM PST by veronica ("America will never seek a permission slip to defend the security of our people." GW Bush 1-20-04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 440 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Good points, as always.
445 posted on 02/02/2004 12:06:53 PM PST by veronica ("America will never seek a permission slip to defend the security of our people." GW Bush 1-20-04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 439 | View Replies]

To: veronica
Not exactly a big "gray area" either.

Your relativities are showing again, but I'll take that as an admission that your original statement about there being no "gray areas" concerning the Holocaust was, in fact, false.

446 posted on 02/02/2004 12:18:13 PM PST by presidio9 (FREE MARTHA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 444 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Don't put words in my mouth. I am prefectly capable of expressing myself without your help. Especially since irony appears to elude you.
447 posted on 02/02/2004 12:24:11 PM PST by veronica ("America will never seek a permission slip to defend the security of our people." GW Bush 1-20-04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 446 | View Replies]

To: veronica
Don't put words in my mouth. I am prefectly capable of expressing myself without your help. Especially since irony appears to elude you.

You really are a silly confused person. Here is exactly what you said (God forbid I should put words in your mouth):

"There is no gray area regarding the facts of the Holocaust."

Later you talked about the degree of gray area. You can't have it both ways. Either there are some gray areas surrounding the details of the Holocaust, or there are not. Again, this is not subject to debate. You laid claim to an ignorant absolutism. Deal with it. Life goes on.

448 posted on 02/02/2004 12:39:14 PM PST by presidio9 (FREE MARTHA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 447 | View Replies]

To: Texas2step
What exactly is "untrue"?

You wrote " There's absolutely no reason for Mel to even address this question. It's completely asinine! "

Peggy Noonan asked Mel Gibson the question because his father's comments about the Holocaust are in the public realm and he has only supported his father's comments publicly albeit without categorizing them other than generally. Peggy did not ask an asinine question. She asked the question so he could put the issue to rest. She gave him a clear chance to distance himself from the question of Holocaust denial. He left ambiguity because he listed the numbers for non Jews who were killed in World War II and declined to list the numbers of Jews killed. It reminded me of Clinton's non-denial denials. I would like to see a straight answer from Mel Gibson on how many Jews he thinks were murdered in the Holocaust.

449 posted on 02/02/2004 12:52:04 PM PST by af_vet_1981
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 410 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
If Hutton Gibson is still relevant to the thread, another reminder that he doesn’t question the “number”. He contends the Holocaust was a physical impossibility, that that many couldn’t be killed nor the bodies disposed of, that the whole thing is a hoax, perpetrated to populate Israel and make money for the Jews, who control the world and have despoiled the Catholic Church.

Do you have a link to his comments ?

450 posted on 02/02/2004 12:54:32 PM PST by af_vet_1981
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 439 | View Replies]

To: Texas2step
I just have a hard time understanding how "Yes, of course" is denial.

It is a denial because he did not distance himself from his father's view of the Holocaust. He had the perfect opportunity but chose not to take it. He had numbers for the Ukrainian (Catholics I assume). He had numbers for the total casualties of World War II. I can't accept that he does not attribute numbers to the Jews murdered in the Holocaust. There is really no excuse.

451 posted on 02/02/2004 1:02:53 PM PST by af_vet_1981
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 404 | View Replies]

To: exmarine
Dietrich Bonhofer did die trying as did the family of Corey Tin Boon and many others. I believe the churches in Germany went along with Hitler because they bought into the satanic lie from hell that Hitler's measures against the jews were somehow God's judgment on the jewish race, and all of Germany was judged for its complicity as every major german city was razed to the ground and millions of civilians were killed.

There were Catholic martyrs who gave their lives, and others who simply risked their lives, to save Jews in the Holocaust. They are righteous men and women.

452 posted on 02/02/2004 1:23:54 PM PST by af_vet_1981
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 400 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_1981
I’ll post some later if I can find them. Until his recent “fame” most of Huttons writing seems to be either pre-internet or not on the internet in their entirety, so you often have to rely on excerpts, some at somewhat unnice places. The quote below is from the NYT Magazine interview, widely available, and he touched on most of the points. None of the quotes are denied. If you were really interested Flatland Books (I know nothing about them) has his publications for sale along with a few excerpts.

---------------------

Excerpts from March 9, 2003, Sunday NYT Magazine

Is the Pope Catholic . . . Enough?

Mel Gibson is also known in traditionalist circles as the most famous son of Hutton Gibson, a well-known author and activist who has railed against the Vatican for more than 30 years. His books on the topic include ''Is the Pope Catholic?'' and ''The Enemy Is Here.'' (Precisely where is indicated by a map on the dust jacket -- it's a cartoon of Italy, drawn by one of his 49 grandchildren). Gibson père also publishes a quarterly newsletter called ''The War Is Now!,'' which includes all manner of verbal volleys against a pope he calls ''Garrulous Karolus, the Koran Kisser.''

………….

Which made it all the odder when he launched into one of his complex conspiracy theories. On our first night together, he nursed a mug of sassafras tea while leading a four-hour tutorial on so-called sedevacantism, which holds that all the popes going back to John XXIII in the 1950's have been illegitimate -- ''anti-popes,'' he called them. As Hutton explained it, the conservative cardinal Giuseppe Siri was probably passed over for pope in 1958 in favor of a more reform-minded candidate. Hutton said Cardinal Siri was duly elected, but was forced to step aside by conspirators inside and outside the church. These shadowy enemies might have threatened ''to atom-bomb the Vatican City,'' he said. In another conversation, he told me that the Second Vatican Council was ''a Masonic plot backed by the Jews.''

The intrigue got only murkier and more menacing from there. The next day after church, over a plate of roast beef at a buffet joint off the highway, conversation turned to the events of Sept. 11. Hutton flatly rejected that Al Qaeda hijackers had anything to do with the attacks. ''Anybody can put out a passenger list,'' he said.

So what happened? ''They were crashed by remote control,'' he replied.

He moved on to the Holocaust, dismissing historical accounts that six million Jews were exterminated. ''Go and ask an undertaker or the guy who operates the crematorium what it takes to get rid of a dead body,'' he said. ''It takes one liter of petrol and 20 minutes. Now, six million?''

Across the table, Joye suddenly looked up from her plate. She was dressed in a stylish outfit for church, wearing a leather patchwork blazer and a felt beret in place of the traditional headdress. She had kept quiet most of the day, so it was a surprise when she cheerfully piped in. ''There weren't even that many Jews in all of Europe,'' she said.

''Anyway, there were more after the war than before,'' Hutton added.

The entire catastrophe was manufactured, said Hutton, as part of an arrangement between Hitler and ''financiers'' to move Jews out of Germany. Hitler ''had this deal where he was supposed to make it rough on them so they would all get out and migrate to Israel because they needed people there to fight the Arabs,'' he said.

Whether any of this has rubbed off on Hutton's son Mel is an open question. A church elder at Holy Family says that while the two share the same foundation of faith, Mel Gibson parts company with his father on many points. ''He doesn't go along with a lot of what his dad says,'' he says. And beyond claiming to have seen the plans for Holy Family and attended services with the congregation, Hutton Gibson has no apparent connection to his son's church in California.

Still, Mel Gibson has shown some of his father's flair for conspiracy scenarios. In a 1995 Playboy interview, he related a sketchy theory that various presidential assassinations and assassination attempts have been acts of retribution for economic reforms that challenged the powers-that-be. ''There's something to do with the Federal Reserve that Lincoln did, Kennedy did and Reagan tried,'' he said. ''I can't remember what it was. My dad told me about it. Everyone who did this particular thing that would have fixed the economy got undone. Anyway, I'll end up dead if I keep talking.''

453 posted on 02/02/2004 1:27:28 PM PST by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 450 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_1981
Words fail me.
454 posted on 02/02/2004 1:32:43 PM PST by af_vet_1981
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 452 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_1981
There were Catholic martyrs who gave their lives, and others who simply risked their lives, to save Jews in the Holocaust. They are righteous men and women.

Yes, there were notable exceptions, but the majority of so-called Christian churches in Germany went along. That is just a fact. And the state of the church in America today is similar to that of Germany in 1933 in some respects. For example, almost all of the liberal mainline churches (Methodist, Presb. Church USA, Eposcopal, Lutheran, National Council of Churches, etc.) are pro-abortion, pro-homosexuality, pro-gay marriage, pro-gay clergy, do not believe the bible is the Word of God; and the catholic church heirarchy protected and abetted child molestors. In other words, the church in America today is CORRUPT to a great extent as much as the Germany churches were - they is co-sigining the culture's descent into total depravity. Might as well post an "ICHABOD" sign above the doors of many churches today.

455 posted on 02/02/2004 1:36:05 PM PST by exmarine ( sic semper tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 452 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_1981
I'm going to have to continue to disagree with your comments in these last two posts.

Mel Gibson is a Christian man, directing a movie about the Final hours of Jesus Christ.

He is not making a movie about the Holocaust, WWII, Nazi's, or specifically about Jewish people (though Jewish people play prominent roles in most of his movie, it's not a story about "the Jews").

He has never, ever made a statement that can be attributed as "denial" or "revisionist".

He has a father who has made some wild claims and has a wacky stream.

He has been attacked foundlessly and falsely by non-secular Jews who have an agenda and the attacks have been fierce and merciless.

Nothing he can say will change the minds nor tactics of Abe Foxman and his ilk.

Some posters on this web site have decided that they would just as soon attack him, even though the have no basis for doing so. Any answer he could give will not suffice. SO9 wants a one word answer (his words), claudis wants a specifically worded phrase (his words), and I have no idea what you want, but you've mentioned that you want specific numbers.

He was asked a question by Peggy Noonan and he answered it. In fact, we probably don't even have the whole of his answer as all we have read is an article by a 3rd person who quotes portions of the interview. The answer was more than satisfactory to most reasonable people who have read it, regardless.

He loves his father. His faith (and Jewish faith as well) calls for him to honor his father. You evidently want him to trash his father, something that he has no reason for doing as it would not gain him anything. Regardless of his fathers views, they are not Mel's. He has made no reference that would make us believe that Mel shares his fathers views of the Holocaust. It would be presumptuous of us to ask Mel to rebuke his fathers views as it has nothing to do with the movie Mel has made that has caused this entire uproar.

Yes, of course is a straight answer to a straight question. Why you cannot accept that shows that no answer he gives would be acceptable.

You mentioned that his answer reminded you of Bill Clinton. I fail to see the connection. Bill Clinton flat out lied to us. Period. It's undisputible. What part of Mel's answer is untrue? None of it.
456 posted on 02/02/2004 1:43:12 PM PST by Texas2step
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 451 | View Replies]

To: Texas2step
I agree with your last post completely and I COMPLETELY support Mel Gibson in his effort to send out the Gospel of Jesus Christ! May God richly bless Him and His efforts, and I believe God is behind it all the way! I believe this movie is boing to be EARTH SHATTERING in its impact, and that this may be the biggest revival in the history of hte United States of America. It may be America's last chance to repent before a final judgment.
457 posted on 02/02/2004 1:50:23 PM PST by exmarine ( sic semper tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 456 | View Replies]

To: Texas2step; af_vet_1981
In fact, we probably don't even have the whole of his answer as all we have read is an article by a 3rd person who quotes portions of the interview.

The whole article is over here if anyone is concerned about the excerpting.

Is the Pope Catholic...Enough? as well at the NYT website.

As I've noted before, Hutton is a public figure in his own right, he's written two books, a newsletter, and speaks publicly. Personally, I think the NYT quotes are enough to identify him as a revisionist, and since you properly note his views aren't necessarily his son's, I'm not sure it makes sense to load the thread with comments from Hutton and his supporters.

458 posted on 02/02/2004 1:57:31 PM PST by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 456 | View Replies]

To: Texas2step
He is not making a movie about the Holocaust, WWII, Nazi's, or specifically about Jewish people (though Jewish people play prominent roles in most of his movie, it's not a story about "the Jews").

It is a story about "the Jews" told from his perspective.

He has never, ever made a statement that can be attributed as "denial" or "revisionist". He has a father who has made some wild claims and has a wacky stream.

Would you characterize his father's claims as "denial" or "revisionist" ?

He was asked a question by Peggy Noonan and he answered it. In fact, we probably don't even have the whole of his answer as all we have read is an article by a 3rd person who quotes portions of the interview.

That is true. He may have said in the interview. I doubt it but I would be happy if he gave a number in the interview. I wouldn't understand why the number would be suppressed though.

His faith (and Jewish faith as well) calls for him to honor his father. You evidently want him to trash his father,

No. I want to hear him distance himself from what his father is reported to have said about the Jews. He apparently won't do that for fear of upsetting his father.

Yes, of course is a straight answer to a straight question. Why you cannot accept that shows that no answer he gives would be acceptable.

No, it was not a straight answer. He gave numbers for the Ukrainians who were killed but not the Jews. His father is reported to have said there were not that many Jews in Europe and it was a conspiracy to get Jews into the Middle East. He has said his father never lied to him. What are we supposed to draw from that answer ?

You mentioned that his answer reminded you of Bill Clinton. I fail to see the connection. Bill Clinton flat out lied to us. Period. It's indisputable. What part of Mel's answer is untrue? None of it.

Clinton argued a technical point of the meaning of the word "is" so as to not give all the information. I would like to know how many Jews Mel thinks were killed in the Holocaust. He knows Math. He proved that with the Ukrainians and the total number for World War Two. What he is doing makes no sense whatsoever.

459 posted on 02/02/2004 1:57:56 PM PST by af_vet_1981
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 456 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_1981
It is a story about "the Jews" told from his perspective

Baloney. If what you say is tue, then the 4 gospels are stories about the jews. It is quite clear that the movie is ABOUT JESUS CHRIST. Jews are incidental to the story as much as you and I are. WE ALL PUT JESUS ON THAT CROSS WITH OUR SINS- and we had better repent and put our faith in Him IF WE WANT TO BE SAVED. - That is the focus of the movie.

460 posted on 02/02/2004 2:10:42 PM PST by exmarine ( sic semper tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 459 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 421-440441-460461-480481-483 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson