[_Jim]

Since the time of the great Nikola Tesla (and before), a small sector of the scientific community has known that so-called 'free energy' can be extracted

Rubbish.

Complete and unadulterated rubbish.

To quote Dan Lancaster "Anybody who has developed a limitless supply of 'free energy' had better develop an infinite sink as well".

To date, EVERY legitimate, peer-reviewed 'effect' and behavior of matter and its interaction with other matter has withstood the test of time and repeated experiments by others -

- SOMETHING you haven't yet grasped despite my postings to the contrary.

Posting VOLUMES of material 'claiming' discoveries means nothing; either show us the beef and let experiments be 'performed' by legitimate scientists and researchers with *real* lab-equipment or risk being labeled a perennial crackpot - to date, this has not happened.

[Quix]

No.

An extensive set of peer reviewed processes with the Disclosure project are set to be disclosed at a proper time.

I can trust that. I can understand that you can't.

[Quix]

The examinations, experimentations have been performed by legitimate scientists in famous labs around the country. They will be disclosed and backed up with extensive documentation at the proper time.

Actually, as I understand it--that phase is long over, well in hand.

The phase they are much more into now is insuring that the particular design of the product is the best possible design in all components for mass production.

[aruanan]

Posting VOLUMES of material 'claiming' discoveries means nothing; either show us the beef and let experiments be 'performed' by legitimate scientists and researchers with *real* lab-equipment or risk being labeled a perennial crackpot - to date, this has not happened.

If you read the history of scientific progress, _Jim, you'd show a bit more humility. Your definition of "legitimate scientist" and "real lab-equipment [sic]" wouldn't happen to be "a scientist whose results fail to give support to such a notion" and "equipment such a scientist uses to obtain null results"?

Remember that from the time that dynamos were first invented (Faraday, 1831) to the time when they became more than 50% efficient (Edison, late 1870's) was almost 50 years. But it took only about half that time for scientific opinion to have taken what was then observed on state-of-the-art equipment and sclerosed it into the immutability of natural law. Edison said that he was going to make a dynamo with an efficiency that was greater than 90%. The rest of the scientific world said that anything greater than 50% was against the laws of nature.