Skip to comments.
2004 Projected Presidential Electoral Votes as of 1/21/2004
TradeSports.com ^
| Wednesday, January 21, 2003
| Momaw Nadon
Posted on 01/21/2004 10:56:54 AM PST by Momaw Nadon
State |
% Chance of Bush Winning |
Bush Electoral Votes |
Dem Electoral Votes |
Alabama |
95.0 |
9 |
0 |
Alaska |
94.0 |
3 |
0 |
Arizona |
83.0 |
10 |
0 |
Arkansas |
72.0 |
6 |
0 |
California |
27.0 |
0 |
55 |
Colorado |
86.0 |
9 |
0 |
Connecticut |
27.5 |
0 |
7 |
Delaware |
42.5 |
0 |
3 |
District of Columbia |
10.0 |
0 |
3 |
Florida |
69.0 |
27 |
0 |
Georgia |
92.0 |
15 |
0 |
Hawaii |
13.0 |
0 |
4 |
Idaho |
95.0 |
4 |
0 |
Illinois |
43.0 |
0 |
21 |
Indiana |
89.0 |
11 |
0 |
Iowa |
72.5 |
7 |
0 |
Kansas |
91.5 |
6 |
0 |
Kentucky |
93.0 |
8 |
0 |
Louisiana |
90.0 |
9 |
0 |
Maine |
47.5 |
0 |
4 |
Maryland |
17.5 |
0 |
10 |
Massachusetts |
12.5 |
0 |
12 |
Michigan |
58.0 |
17 |
0 |
Minnesota |
58.0 |
10 |
0 |
Mississippi |
96.0 |
6 |
0 |
Missouri |
73.0 |
11 |
0 |
Montana |
95.0 |
3 |
0 |
Nebraska |
95.0 |
5 |
0 |
Nevada |
77.5 |
5 |
0 |
New Hampshire |
63.0 |
4 |
0 |
New Jersey |
27.5 |
0 |
15 |
New Mexico |
71.5 |
5 |
0 |
New York |
28.0 |
0 |
31 |
North Carolina |
91.0 |
15 |
0 |
North Dakota |
95.0 |
3 |
0 |
Ohio |
78.0 |
20 |
0 |
Oklahoma |
95.5 |
7 |
0 |
Oregon |
62.0 |
7 |
0 |
Pennsylvania |
63.0 |
21 |
0 |
Rhode Island |
12.5 |
0 |
4 |
South Carolina |
95.0 |
8 |
0 |
South Dakota |
95.0 |
3 |
0 |
Tennessee |
88.0 |
11 |
0 |
Texas |
98.0 |
34 |
0 |
Utah |
95.0 |
5 |
0 |
Vermont |
9.5 |
0 |
3 |
Virginia |
92.5 |
13 |
0 |
Washington |
48.0 |
0 |
11 |
West Virginia |
62.5 |
5 |
0 |
Wisconsin |
61.5 |
10 |
0 |
Wyoming |
95.0 |
3 |
0 |
Totals |
|
355 |
183 |
TOPICS: Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: 2004; bush; election; electionpresident; electoral; electoralvote; electoralvotes; georgebush; georgewbush; president; presidentbush; presidential; vote; votes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-66 last
To: B Knotts
I believe that New York has got to be a lot better than 28%.
I mean, the state does have a Republican governor, and the city did elect a guy who ran as a Republican, and if Rudy Giuliani goes on TV and asks New Yorkers to vote for Dubya, they will.
I think New York is most definitely in play.
To: Bombard
You know what, your right. I just spent some time crunching the numbers from 2000. Even with a "high" voter turn out in STL and KC , GW would have still won the state. Voter turn out was very low in 2000 in KC ( 46% ) and STL ( 39% ), with Bush winning Missouri by about 78,000 votes. There really is not enough there , in the Rat strongholds , to make up the difference. Good news for sure.
It is obvious Missouri has taken a turn to the right in recent years, even with Demorat Holden being elected as Governor ( currently being challenge by state auditor Sara McCaskill in the guber. primary). I hope he gets the nod though so we can run him out of office. I think if she gets the nod, it may be tougher to get a Republican Governor in.
One bit of info some around here may not know:
Missouri has voted for the winner in every presidential election of the 20th century, except in 1956 when voters backed Adlai Stevenson, thereby earning the sobriquet of "bellwhether state."
Keep an eye on Missouri folks !!
62
posted on
01/23/2004 10:25:39 PM PST
by
Peace will be here soon
(Beware, there are some crazy people around here !!! And I could be one of them !!)
To: mwl1
I really doubt that NY is in play. Do you have some new data on this?
To: Alberta's Child
I doubt that Bush will take PA. My own guess is maybe he has 47-48% of the vote.
PA lags the rest of the country in economic recovery, at least my part of PA does. Add to that the fraud machine that Govenor Fast Eddie will be rolling out and it's really an uphill battle for Bush in PA.
64
posted on
01/26/2004 9:09:00 AM PST
by
NEPA
To: NEPA
I don't think Bush will take PA, either. But if it's a close race in that state, I think Bush wins handily elsewhere in the U.S. If the Democrats have to spend a lot of time and money in Pennsylvania, I think they're going to get overwhelmed in other states they won in 2000 (I'm thinking of Wisconsin, Minnesota, and Iowa in particular).
65
posted on
01/26/2004 9:15:01 AM PST
by
Alberta's Child
(Alberta -- the TRUE North strong and free.)
To: Momaw Nadon
The logic and the facts on the ground tell us that President Bush is favored to win in 2004. However, we cannot take this for granted at all because many things can happen from now until November 2nd 2004 that may reduce the chances of President Bush victory. We need to work extremely hard for this victory. Let's roll.
66
posted on
02/02/2004 12:20:18 PM PST
by
jveritas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-66 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson