Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

No proof of water found, Mars rover may have journey ahead
USA Today ^ | 18 Jan 04

Posted on 01/18/2004 5:51:25 PM PST by xzins

Edited on 04/13/2004 1:41:43 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

PASADENA, Calif. (AP)

(Excerpt) Read more at usatoday.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: life; mars; proof; rover; water
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last
To: kinsman redeemer; Gamecock
Even if there is water found, they have still just found a configuration of hydrogen and oxygen.

Finding water is not finding life. (I hope not, I'm going to get a bottle of water here in a moment....if it morphs out of the bottle and takes over my keyboard, I'll let you know...:>)
21 posted on 01/18/2004 6:50:42 PM PST by xzins (Retired Army and Proud of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Truth666
I think Kubrick took that shot.

"Water on Mars" is going to be like the "Life on Mars" Clinton told Dick Morris about. Anything to impress a woman.

If Bush wants to rally the troops around space exploration, fine. Whatever it takes to beat the dims.

But like Christ Rock says about curing aids, it ain't neeever gonna happen.

22 posted on 01/18/2004 6:58:44 PM PST by Dr. Eckleburg (There are very few shades of gray.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe
Thanks for the link. I don't know if my old clunker can handle it But I might give it a try. Thanks
23 posted on 01/18/2004 7:01:55 PM PST by Phil V.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: xzins
Two Words: Anthropic Principle :-)

24 posted on 01/18/2004 7:20:58 PM PST by John H K
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: xzins
How long before the Democratic Candidates blame Mars' lack of water on the Bush Administration?
25 posted on 01/18/2004 7:22:02 PM PST by CurlyBill (Voter fraud is one of the primary campaign strategies of the Democrats!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe
Another one here:

Rovers

26 posted on 01/18/2004 7:29:11 PM PST by jwalburg (Question Patriotism!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: xzins
Cal Thomas on his program on Saturday showed several recent cartoons. One was of a golfer telling his wife that if the government wanted to find water on Mars, they should just send him there with his golf clubs.
27 posted on 01/18/2004 7:31:26 PM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Destro
Another reason why the US needs to get out of the UN.

Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space, Including the Moon and other Celestial Bodies

Article II Outer space, including the moon and other celestial bodies, is not subject to national appropriation by claim of sovereignty, by means of use or occupation, or by any other means.

In other words, the UN Treaty expressly forbids any claim of national appropriation. So, my question is - why can't I appropriate my piece of Mars for myself?

28 posted on 01/18/2004 7:39:40 PM PST by PokeyJoe (This tagline got outsourced to India. Pleased we are posting to this forum with our better skills.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Verginius Rufus
LOL.

That's too good.....and I'm a golfer.
29 posted on 01/18/2004 7:44:35 PM PST by xzins (Retired Army and Proud of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: PokeyJoe
Governments should not claim ownership of Mars - but why not allow a government to grant certain private property rights to those who get their first?

Ain 't this a bit of an oxymoron???


How can a 'gummint' grant ANYTHING if it has no ownership?
30 posted on 01/18/2004 7:45:20 PM PST by Elsie (When the avalanche starts... it's too late for the pebbles to vote....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: PokeyJoe
If MARS was pure GOLD, it would NOT be cost effective to bring any of it back to EARTH!
31 posted on 01/18/2004 7:46:46 PM PST by Elsie (When the avalanche starts... it's too late for the pebbles to vote....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: xzins
No proof of water? Then we shouldn't have sent a probe! The U.N. should have had more time to find the water! </sarcasm>
32 posted on 01/18/2004 7:51:12 PM PST by FreeAtlanta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreeAtlanta
See #27
33 posted on 01/18/2004 7:52:06 PM PST by xzins (Retired Army and Proud of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: xzins
There was an interesting Sci-Fi TV series last year called Firefly that presented the situation that mankind was alone in the universe. It was a courageous premise. The show, while quite good, got cancelled. One often cited reason from disappointed fans was that there were no aliens. They just couldn't even imagine the possiblity. Yet I'm sure they would claim to be the ones with "open minds!" LOL!
34 posted on 01/18/2004 7:58:18 PM PST by FormerLib (We'll fight the good fight until the very end!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: xzins
"Finding water is not finding life."

No, but if you will remember, finding a rock (on earth) laying on the ground, with a microscopic ring-shaped impression that you can declare to be a martian bacterium, seems to be enough for some here.

35 posted on 01/18/2004 7:58:21 PM PST by editor-surveyor ( . Best policy RE: Environmentalists, - ZERO TOLERANCE !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Joe Hadenuf
"If someone wants to take the time to enlarge that image..."

It won't help; you can't make pixels that aren't there.

36 posted on 01/18/2004 7:59:45 PM PST by editor-surveyor ( . Best policy RE: Environmentalists, - ZERO TOLERANCE !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor
I guess if they find iron on Mars, that'll be proof of a visit by US Steel.
37 posted on 01/18/2004 8:03:02 PM PST by xzins (Retired Army and Proud of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: FormerLib
Alone in the universe....

of course not

Let's see, God, cherubim, seraphim, etc., etc.
38 posted on 01/18/2004 8:04:19 PM PST by xzins (Retired Army and Proud of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: xzins
It's beginning to look as if Mars is 200 proof.
39 posted on 01/18/2004 8:05:45 PM PST by AndrewC (I am a Bertrand Russell agnostic, even an atheist.</sarcasm>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor
"If someone wants to take the time to enlarge that image..."

It won't help; you can't make pixels that aren't there.

Oh, I just met just enlarging it like this.


40 posted on 01/18/2004 8:06:30 PM PST by Joe Hadenuf (I failed anger management class, they decided to give me a passing grade anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson