Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Arrest over bomb joke on plane (Idiot Alert)
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au ^ | 1-16-04 | AFP

Posted on 01/18/2004 8:28:59 AM PST by OXENinFLA

Arrest over bomb joke on plane

From correspondents in New York January 17, 2004

A HOLIDAYING French student was in a New York jail here awaiting a court appearance following his arrest over an aircraft bomb "joke".

He left the plane at New York's Kennedy Airport after allegedly joking that he had put a bomb in the plane's toilet, court sources said.

Frank Moulet, 27, was in custody in a floating detention centre called "The Boat" in Long Island Sound off the borough of The Bronx pending charges of making a "false scare".

His girlfriend, arrested with him after they arrived on an American Airlines flight from Santo Domingo, was put on another plane and sent back to France.

Police were called to the plane after a cabin attendant reported that Moulet raised his fist in the air as the plane was landing and shouted, "Oh sh*t, I guess the bomb I planted in the toilet didn't go off".

He faces up to four years in prison on the charge.

US immigration officials have said they are also interested in questioning him.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Political Humor/Cartoons; Unclassified
KEYWORDS: aa; airlinesecurity; bomb; eurotwits; french; jfkairport; joke; notfunny
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 221-229 next last
To: NittanyLion
What I am suggesting is that such behavior on the part of screeners has logical consequences. Those include providing an incentive for people to utilize other modes of transport. I can hardly fault them for that, as some on this thread seem wont to do.

But suggesting that the airlines deserve to go under for attempting to find weapons borne by passengers, and that the country should want to live without air travel as a way of life and as a loss to the economy, is silly as a goal and as a security decision. It isn't as bad as they say, and the exaggerations of the easily over-hassled shouldn't go unanswered by a dose of perspective.

81 posted on 01/18/2004 10:20:59 AM PST by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: HairOfTheDog
But suggesting that the airlines deserve to go under for attempting to find weapons borne by passengers, and that the country should want to live without air travel as a way of life and as a loss to the economy, is silly as a goal and as a security decision.

True enough. The airlines don't really "deserve" anything one way or the other. The system in place is what it is, and we'll all see the long-term consequences (good or bad). As a whole, the flying public will make an intelligent decision regarding flight, and demand will end up at a level of appropriate to the service/price offering. I'm not sure anyone knows what that level of demand is likely to be.

82 posted on 01/18/2004 10:25:16 AM PST by NittanyLion (E-A-G-L-E-S - Eagles!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets
If you were making a substantial part of $70,000 per in the 1970's it's likely you were not a full-time student

From Jan 1974 until June 1977 I took 132 hours after 5:30 in the evening while working 45-60 hours a week and had a 3.25 average. You figure out if I was full time or not.

83 posted on 01/18/2004 10:27:17 AM PST by HoustonCurmudgeon (PEACE - Through Superior Firepower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Things have gone way too far in mant cases but the whole "don't joke about bombs" thing is tried and true. It's better not to have security folks trying to decide who's joking and who's making real threats.
84 posted on 01/18/2004 10:30:58 AM PST by MattAMiller
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

No, going out of one's way would mean driving for thousands of miles because one doesn't like to take off one's shoes for one's own or other's benefit.

85 posted on 01/18/2004 10:31:42 AM PST by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: NittanyLion

Exactly. Hence a biometric database would greatly ease the existing inconvenience of flying. Let those who choose not to be included in the database stand in line and remove their shoes and show their plastic ID cards, while those who made an intelligent decision regarding an appropriate level of service will be ushered right to their seats.

86 posted on 01/18/2004 10:35:54 AM PST by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Cultural Jihad
No, going out of one's way would mean driving for thousands of miles because one doesn't like to take off one's shoes for one's own or other's benefit.

So, how many shoe-bombers have they found?

Airport "security" is a placebo.

The real threat to commercial airline traffic is shoulder-fired missiles.

A sour-pussed high school dropout TSA employee feeling your crotch is not going to stop one.

87 posted on 01/18/2004 10:45:40 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (Drug prohibition laws help fund terrorism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Cultural Jihad
I'm sure your idea will receive just the amount of support it deserves...
88 posted on 01/18/2004 10:49:17 AM PST by NittanyLion (E-A-G-L-E-S - Eagles!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
The real threat to commercial airline traffic is shoulder-fired missiles.

We don't actually know what the real threat that works will be... It will be whatever idea we don't make impractical through the measures we can control.

A sour-pussed high school dropout TSA employee feeling your crotch is not going to stop one.

For the record, the TSA employees I encountered on my four flights this week were pleasant and alert. As were the flight attendents and other aiport personnel. Another exaggeration to try to invent a point.

89 posted on 01/18/2004 11:05:45 AM PST by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
I encountered on my four flights this week were pleasant and alert...

~AND~ not one felt my crotch or even probably, desired to....

90 posted on 01/18/2004 11:07:06 AM PST by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
It is illegal to act like a normal human being when boarding an aircraft.

Normal human beings aren't as stupid as this. Test your theory -- go to a movie theater and yell "All of infidels will die while wearing sausages around your body." Or wait till a national politician shows up in your city for their 2004 campaign and yell -- "Shoot him! Shoot him now" through a walkie-talkie. Some jokes are better left unsaid.

91 posted on 01/18/2004 11:13:06 AM PST by Naspino (You might be conservative -- but are you a patriot?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NittanyLion

I'm sure VISA, MasterCard, and American Express are already working on it.

92 posted on 01/18/2004 11:22:44 AM PST by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Naspino
Supposedly, fraud is bad only when the artless and guileless inflict it upon the clever and the cunning, just as the initiation of force is bad only when it is the weak inflicting it upon the strong.
93 posted on 01/18/2004 11:26:46 AM PST by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Proud Infidel
Reids mistake was to light his shoe in front of passengers.

I've read that Reid's mistake was omitting the blasting cap needed to detonate the explosive. The man was apparently a dim bulb, and his plan was flawed and untested, if indeed it was to blow up an aircraft.

However, now we all remove our shoes as we go through the security line, and feel the further alienation from our institutions and our countrymen -- we each are now terror suspects in our own home -- perhaps this was Reid's goal...

This alienation results in a few rash individuals blurting out stupid jokes, some avoiding the aggravating situation (sour grapes, or claim of special privilege), most complying with the new idiocies of the day, and ironically, some plotting a way to effectively retaliate against perceived oppression. It's a new road rage.

94 posted on 01/18/2004 11:28:44 AM PST by GregoryFul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: HairOfTheDog
I had similar experiences when flying to Charlotte, NC not too long ago. I agree with you.
95 posted on 01/18/2004 11:34:06 AM PST by Lion in Winter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: GregoryFul

I know exactly how you feel. Just the other day I wasn't allowed enter my own bank while wearing a mask!

96 posted on 01/18/2004 11:40:29 AM PST by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: OXENinFLA
Sacre Blue! What A Fool!
97 posted on 01/18/2004 11:42:47 AM PST by mylife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
It is illegal to act like a normal human being when boarding an aircraft.

Normal human beings don't joke about planting a bomb on an airplane.

98 posted on 01/18/2004 11:46:48 AM PST by judgeandjury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: HairOfTheDog

99 posted on 01/18/2004 12:01:12 PM PST by ecurbh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: ecurbh
~smiles~
100 posted on 01/18/2004 12:01:47 PM PST by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 221-229 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson