Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Arrest over bomb joke on plane (Idiot Alert)
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au ^ | 1-16-04 | AFP

Posted on 01/18/2004 8:28:59 AM PST by OXENinFLA

Arrest over bomb joke on plane

From correspondents in New York January 17, 2004

A HOLIDAYING French student was in a New York jail here awaiting a court appearance following his arrest over an aircraft bomb "joke".

He left the plane at New York's Kennedy Airport after allegedly joking that he had put a bomb in the plane's toilet, court sources said.

Frank Moulet, 27, was in custody in a floating detention centre called "The Boat" in Long Island Sound off the borough of The Bronx pending charges of making a "false scare".

His girlfriend, arrested with him after they arrived on an American Airlines flight from Santo Domingo, was put on another plane and sent back to France.

Police were called to the plane after a cabin attendant reported that Moulet raised his fist in the air as the plane was landing and shouted, "Oh sh*t, I guess the bomb I planted in the toilet didn't go off".

He faces up to four years in prison on the charge.

US immigration officials have said they are also interested in questioning him.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Political Humor/Cartoons; Unclassified
KEYWORDS: aa; airlinesecurity; bomb; eurotwits; french; jfkairport; joke; notfunny
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-229 next last
To: OXENinFLA
Boy, I tell ya. It's interesting to hear about a French guy with balls, even if he is as dumb as a post...
21 posted on 01/18/2004 8:55:59 AM PST by Chad Fairbanks (What am I rebelling against? Well, what do ya got?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_1981
You are conspiring to bankrupt the airlines.

Your ignorance is showing.

A conspiracy involves two or more people.

I made three 1000-mile plus car trips last year rather than subject myself to airport thuggery.

Explain to me how that is a conspiracy?

22 posted on 01/18/2004 8:56:16 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (Drug prohibition laws help fund terrorism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
"All that was necessary was to put impenetrable doors on cockpits.

How would something like that stop another Bojinka plot?

23 posted on 01/18/2004 8:56:26 AM PST by USF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets
You have at least two things in common with Osama bin Laden.

Osama doesn't give a flying F^%$ about airlines.

He wants to end the American way of life, which is freedom.

So you see, you actually have more in common with Osama.

24 posted on 01/18/2004 8:58:43 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (Drug prohibition laws help fund terrorism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
I'm with you on this. The others on this thread couldn't see that you are objecting to the way that the airlines treat their passengers, though I can understand why the airlines would react the way they do about threats, real or implied. Nevertheless, those made in jest--though this is a stupid thing to do--shouldn't warrant four years in the pen, maybe some time or just a heavy fine but not substantial jail time.

I think that what you are saying is that if the airlines were dependent on folks such as you to fill their coffers they would have been out of business a long time ago. Count me on your side.
25 posted on 01/18/2004 8:59:12 AM PST by OldPossum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: USF
How would something like that stop another Bojinka plot?

In case you didn't notice, IT FAILED!!!

26 posted on 01/18/2004 9:03:29 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (Drug prohibition laws help fund terrorism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_1981
Take one, and only one, more flight.

I just said that I DON'T FLY.

Are you deaf, or just plain stupid?

27 posted on 01/18/2004 9:05:33 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (Drug prohibition laws help fund terrorism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: OldPossum
I think that what you are saying is that if the airlines were dependent on folks such as you to fill their coffers they would have been out of business a long time ago. Count me on your side.

The only reason the airlines are making it is because the Pentagon is sending all the soldiers to Iraq on commercial flights.

A hidden airline subsidy.

Once the war in Iraq is over (and it will be soon because Bush wants to remove it as a reelection issue) the airlines are going to start feeling the pinch.

28 posted on 01/18/2004 9:08:39 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (Drug prohibition laws help fund terrorism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: OXENinFLA

Know when to "say when".

29 posted on 01/18/2004 9:12:51 AM PST by socal_parrot (http://www.campbellforsenate.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: killjoy
You may be confused. That was a Hillary.
30 posted on 01/18/2004 9:16:41 AM PST by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: OldPossum; E. Pluribus Unum
The Airlines are not responsible for this situation, it is the government. We have given the government way too much power to solve a problem which it created with incompetent policies and ignored intelligence warnings.

When a government makes a serious crime out of just being immature and stupid, that is a problem. We are indeed loosing more freedom all the time.

31 posted on 01/18/2004 9:17:30 AM PST by Semper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: OXENinFLA
floating detention centre called "The Boat" in Long Island Sound off the borough of The Bronx

LOL! I participated in the construction of that jail at Avondale Shipyards in New Orleans.

I wondered if it was still around?

32 posted on 01/18/2004 9:19:27 AM PST by Cold Heat ("It is easier for an ass to succeed in that trade than any other." [Samuel Clemens, on lawyers])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
I made three 1000-mile plus car trips last year rather than subject myself to airport thuggery.

"Thuggery" my butt. Methinks you don't know what thuggery is. I just flew from one corner of the country to the other yesterday in a little over 6 hours. The security and airline personnel were helpful and alert and the trip was a breeze. Walking through security is easy.... It is only dealing with butt-head people who find anything and everything intolerable that makes it hard.

33 posted on 01/18/2004 9:21:21 AM PST by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Didn't Bojinka fail because some twit had a fire in his apartment? I don't see how "impenetrable doors on cockpits" would have stopped such a plot, though I can see how incresed airport security would.

All that was necessary was to put impenetrable doors on cockpits.

I'm not even sure that would stop the next Richard Reid. Reids mistake was to light his shoe in front of passengers. Had he walked to the bathroom and lighted them there in privacy, it would have been a different story.

34 posted on 01/18/2004 9:21:42 AM PST by Proud Infidel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
All that was necessary was to put impenetrable doors on cockpits.

Unless the pilot is a bad guy.

35 posted on 01/18/2004 9:24:05 AM PST by Starrgaizr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: HairOfTheDog
Walking through security is easy....

I've had similar experiences. Of course, I've also had a male screener force my wife to unbutton and unzip her jeans because the jack*** couldn't figure out metal buttons might set off the wand detector. One experience like the latter, and you too might be determined to avoid demeaning minimum wage bureaucrats if at all possible.

36 posted on 01/18/2004 9:28:35 AM PST by NittanyLion (E-A-G-L-E-S - Eagles!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Ramius
One ping only....
37 posted on 01/18/2004 9:28:48 AM PST by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
It is illegal to act like a normal human being when boarding an aircraft.

Let me get this straight; you feel that he was acting "like a normal human being" considering the tone of the times?

38 posted on 01/18/2004 9:29:12 AM PST by JimRed (Disinformation is the leftist's and enemy's friend; consider the source before believing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Proud Infidel; E. Pluribus Unum
911 will never happen again, because American passengers WILL NOT ALLOW IT.

While I tend to agree that passesnger like myself will willingly put themselves in the front line and defend the aircraft we travel on, the rest of the passengers, and the innocent folks on the ground, it is reassuring that the opportunity for a knife weilding manic or bomber never makes it onto the plane in the first place....

I flew out of Phoenix on Tuesday... they had set up a second layer of security at skyharbor airport (it was an international flight) where they patted everyone down and searched their handluggage on the airbridge into the aircraft. They found a small knife on one of my fellow passengers. He had made it thru the regular security (Xrays, metal detecters etc) and it was only during the additional shoes off, coat and bag search that they found this knife on him. So, does increased security work? Yes, I believe in this case, the system did, and this example is applicable to the bojinka jihadis and shoebombers out there too.

39 posted on 01/18/2004 9:29:14 AM PST by USF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: OXENinFLA
Yet another American injustice for France to be huffy about. (hehehe)
40 posted on 01/18/2004 9:30:37 AM PST by Libertina (CPAC - Conservative Political Action Conference - Jan 22-24, DC http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-229 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson