Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Concealed carry' bewilders enforcers
The Cincinnati Enquirer ^ | January 10, 2004 | Dan Klepal

Posted on 01/10/2004 10:05:37 AM PST by spald

Saturday, January 10, 2004

'Concealed carry' bewilders enforcers


State officials unclear about permits, rules, firearms training

By Dan Klepal
The Cincinnati Enquirer

Law enforcement officials had more questions than answers Friday about Ohio's new law permitting people to carry concealed weapons.

The law takes effect April 7 and requires the state's 88 sheriffs to process applications for permits to carry handguns within 45 days.

CONCEALED CARRY RULES

• Ohio residents would have to do the following to get licenses to carry concealed handguns:
• Complete a 12-hour gun safety course.
• Pass criminal and competency background checks.
• Be at least 21 years old.
• Pay a fee.
• Renew their licenses every four years.
Restrictions
Ohioans with licenses to carry concealed firearms would not be able to carry them into the following places:
• Any government buildings.
• Schools, school safety zones and universities
• Buildings with liquor permits.
• Places of worship
• Day-care centers and homes
• Any business, workplace or private property that posts a ban on concealed weapons.
• Any place where handguns are prohibited under federal law.
Source: Ohio Legislative Service Commission.

Clermont County Sheriff A.J. "Tim" Rodenberg Jr. spent most of Friday studying the new law. He said there is a lot to worry about.

"There are a lot of little twists and turns in there that can really trip people up," Rodenberg said. "And not just citizens - governmental agencies, too. The first few months are going to be real interesting. We're going to have our hands full, and we're going to have to circle the wagons and be ready for it."

The Ohio Attorney General's Office has its hands full, too. It must create a database in the next 90 days listing everyone found mentally incompetent by an Ohio court.

In addition, the attorney general has to produce brochures explaining the new law and the permit application forms - both of which will go before the Ohio Peace Officer's Training Commission for approval.

"Nothing like the database exists right now,' said Bob Beasley, spokesman for the Attorney General's Office. "We're working on it. The bill was signed yesterday, so we have 90 days."

Among the questions sheriffs were asking Friday:

• How will the $45 permit application fee be split, and will more state money be coming to cover the expense of processing the paperwork and performing the background checks?

• Can they refuse a permit if the person meets the criteria?

• People have to complete a "certified" firearms training course, but nothing in the law defines what a certified program is. Will there be a master list of certified programs across the state?

• Will training programs teach Ohio firearms law and self-defense law?

Butler County Sheriff's spokesman Monte Mayer said his office is waiting for answers.

"We are awaiting some direction on the law from the Buckeye State Sheriffs Association to determine exactly what steps we have to take," Mayer said. "The nuts and bolts have yet to be worked out. The next 30 to 60 days, we'll learn more about what needs to be done.

And the foremost question: How many people will apply for a permit?

"Who knows?" Mayer said.

The law allows people to apply for a permit in adjacent counties, which could mean that people trying to avoid what could be long lines in Hamilton County may file their applications in Clermont County.

"I think we'll be talking about thousands of people, not hundreds," Rodenberg said. "It's kind of like waiting for something to hit you in the head, but you don't know what it is. You can guess all you want to, but until (it happens), you're not going to have any way to know."

In Hamilton County, sheriff's spokesman Steve Barnett sent out an advisory asking that the public not call because there are too many unresolved issues.

Chuck Klein, a 61-year-old downtown resident who was part of the lawsuit that helped force passage of the law, has mixed feelings about the law.

"The number of places that we are restricted from carrying guns creates impossible scenarios," Klein said. "You can't carry one into a school safety zone. Now what is a parent supposed to do with the gun when he gets to the school? Lock it in the trunk before he gets to the school? That doesn't make any sense at all.

"I don't think putting a gun in a car is a good idea under any conditions."

E-mail dklepal@enquirer.com


TOPICS: Extended News; Government; US: Ohio
KEYWORDS: bang; banglist; ccw; concealedcarry; ohio
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last
Sherrif A.J. Rodenberg, Clermont County: "The first few months are going to be real interesting. We're going to have our hands full, and we're going to have to circle the wagons and be ready for it."

Could somebody ping the bang list please?

1 posted on 01/10/2004 10:05:38 AM PST by spald
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All
Rank Location Receipts Donors/Avg Freepers/Avg Monthlies
26 Oregon 325.00
10
32.50
218
1.49
85.00
5

Thanks for donating to Free Republic!

Move your locale up the leaderboard!

2 posted on 01/10/2004 10:07:22 AM PST by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spald; *bang_list
Could somebody ping the bang list please?

No sooner said than done.

Add this to the "To:" line, *bang_list

the asterik is required to make it work.

Also, these whining LEO types have no sympathy from me. If they want to play it safe, assume that EVERYONE has the right to carry a gun, and LEAVE THEM ALONE.

3 posted on 01/10/2004 10:09:03 AM PST by LibKill ("Two crossed, dead, Frenchmen emblazoned on a mound of dead Frenchmen.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spald
What a bunch of freakin' idiots.

The fools in the Ohio, in an effort to harass honest gun owners, have made this bill so confusing that even the bureaucrats who designed it can't figure it out.

Fortunately, a few smart legislators put recipocity in to the bill, so that Ohio will honor the CCW 'permits' of other states.

The end result of all this might very well be that Ohio issues only a few dozen permits (collecting hundreds of dollars, while spending millions to set up the databases), while the residents of Ohio simply get non-resident permits from states like Florida that "allow" them to carry in Ohio.

4 posted on 01/10/2004 10:09:42 AM PST by Mulder (Fight the future)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Support Free Republic
Spam spam spam spam spam spam spam,

SPAAAAAAAAMMMMM! Wonderful SPAAAAAAAAMMMMM!

5 posted on 01/10/2004 10:10:16 AM PST by LibKill ("Two crossed, dead, Frenchmen emblazoned on a mound of dead Frenchmen.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: LibKill
Also, these whining LEO types have no sympathy from me.

The Ohio State Patrol, by their behaviour on this bill, has earned the honor of 'dumbest LE agency in America'

6 posted on 01/10/2004 10:10:45 AM PST by Mulder (Fight the future)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mulder
The confusion is thanks to our wonderful "republican" Governor in Ohio... he wouldn't sign any bill until is was sufficiently muddy for his tastes.

7 posted on 01/10/2004 10:11:59 AM PST by Gerasimov
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: spald
"The first few months are going to be real interesting. We're going to have our hands full, and we're going to have to circle the wagons and be ready for it."

The fact is they have been circling the wagons - thats why the law was necessary.

8 posted on 01/10/2004 10:13:49 AM PST by ClintonBeGone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spald
Can they refuse a permit if the person meets the criteria?

Now why would they want to be able to do that?
Hmmmmmm.
9 posted on 01/10/2004 10:14:16 AM PST by tet68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gerasimov
The confusion is thanks to our wonderful "republican" Governor in Ohio... he wouldn't sign any bill until is was sufficiently muddy for his tastes.

The irony is that Ohio will likely end up as the only state with shall-issue CCW to actually lose money on the deal.

10 posted on 01/10/2004 10:14:26 AM PST by Mulder (Fight the future)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: spald
They act like this hasn't already been done in 35 other states or something.
11 posted on 01/10/2004 10:15:28 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (Drug prohibition laws help fund terrorism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spald
>>We're going to have our hands full, and we're going to have to circle the wagons and be ready for it."

Get a clue, call everyone in from the donut shops, and hand out and discuss a thoughtful policy that recognizes that CCW citizens that have been through a serious background check are an allies of law enforcers and enforcement.

>>The Ohio Attorney General's Office has its hands full, too. It must create a database in the next 90 days listing everyone found mentally incompetent by an Ohio court.

Puh-leeze. There are probably 100 firms in Ohio capable of doing this work in that time. The real problem is government contracting rules and inability of the AG's office to define clearly what it is they want. I could write that RFP in a day of interviews and study of the legislation, and a day of actual write-up.

12 posted on 01/10/2004 10:19:30 AM PST by FreedomPoster (this space intentionally blank)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mulder
Do any states allow concealed carry WITHOUT a government permit? In other words, do any states recognize the US Constitution?
13 posted on 01/10/2004 10:20:36 AM PST by gitmo (Who is John Galt?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mulder
>>The Ohio State Patrol, by their behaviour on this bill, has earned the honor of 'dumbest LE agency in America'

To be fair, we shouldn't blame the rank and file Ohio Highway Patrolmen, who are probably for it. The head of the OSP, who has been making all of the idiotic statements, should qualify as Dumbest State Patrol Chief of the Year 2003 rather easily, though.
14 posted on 01/10/2004 10:22:09 AM PST by FreedomPoster (this space intentionally blank)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: gitmo
Vermont and I believe Alaska
15 posted on 01/10/2004 10:22:27 AM PST by FreedomPoster (this space intentionally blank)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: gitmo
I think Vermont is the only state to obey the constitution in this regard. At one time Minnesota also did.
16 posted on 01/10/2004 10:22:51 AM PST by yarddog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: gitmo
Do any states allow concealed carry WITHOUT a government permit?

Vermont and Alaska.

Vermont has been like that for a long time.

Alaska went they way last year, after having a "permit" system for awhile.

17 posted on 01/10/2004 10:22:53 AM PST by Mulder (Fight the future)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Mulder; yarddog
I win. ;-)
18 posted on 01/10/2004 10:27:41 AM PST by FreedomPoster (this space intentionally blank)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: spald
There's not much worse than a sheriff that has such a low opinion of his neighbors, that they treat them like these bozos are. The only ones worse are those that use illegal means to screw their neighbor.
19 posted on 01/10/2004 10:28:32 AM PST by spunkets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spald
It must create a database in the next 90 days listing everyone found mentally incompetent by an Ohio court.

And then they must issue both a permit and a weapon to everyone on that list.

20 posted on 01/10/2004 10:30:54 AM PST by Rome2000 (Ban "Jihad", not smoking)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson