Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iowa Sen. Tom Harkin to Endorse Dean
Newsday ^ | 1/9/04

Posted on 01/09/2004 10:38:21 AM PST by areafiftyone

DES MOINES, Iowa -- Iowa Sen. Tom Harkin will endorse Howard Dean for the Democratic presidential nomination, party sources said Friday, giving a key boost to an embattled front-runner 10 days before the state's kick-off caucuses.

(Excerpt) Read more at newsday.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Iowa
KEYWORDS: 2004; dean; endorsement; howarddean; ia; tomharkin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last
To: Solson; Cautor
Because Harkin only matters in Iowa.

I disagree. Harkin is a national figure among progressives. He's run for president and got 16K votes in New Hampshire after winning uncontestedly in Iowa. Many wanted him to run in 2000 against Gore.

41 posted on 01/09/2004 11:49:06 AM PST by GraniteStateConservative ("Howard Dean is incontrovertible proof that God is on Bush's side in the 2004 election"- Dick Morris)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: philosofy123; ken5050
To your points: Yes, McGovern got his clock cleaned by the hated Nixon. History in turn cleaned Nixon's clock and gave us Carter in '76.

Dean is farther left and the far left hates Bush so intensely -- I really got the impression just the other week that Hillary may not try to steal the '04 nomination after all. She'll take 4 more years to weave her web. Let her.

42 posted on 01/09/2004 11:51:26 AM PST by irgbar-man (Why don't aardvarks get sick? They're full of antie-bodies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
Jeanne Shaheen, former Gov of New Hampshire. Also Sens. Dianne Feinstein and Ted Kennedy.
43 posted on 01/09/2004 11:52:48 AM PST by GraniteStateConservative ("Howard Dean is incontrovertible proof that God is on Bush's side in the 2004 election"- Dick Morris)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: GraniteStateConservative
Hmmmmm ... that's pretty sad for Kerry
44 posted on 01/09/2004 11:54:13 AM PST by Mo1 (Join the dollar a day crowd now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief
Harkin has been brain dead for decades.
45 posted on 01/09/2004 11:59:17 AM PST by monocle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GraniteStateConservative
Clark has to be up 10 points in these states just to be tied with Dean after he gets these big wins in January.

Of course if some of the other folks are knocked out, Clark may pick up their non-Dean or anti-Dean votes, which could offset that.

I think in some places, like South Carolina, Dean can only reach a certain ceiling, beyond which it'll be all anti-Dean (at least with white voters).

46 posted on 01/09/2004 12:09:56 PM PST by JohnnyZ (I pity the fool who thinks Bush's proposal is the same as amnesty!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
More than an endorsement. Curse of the "dung-heap".
47 posted on 01/09/2004 12:14:43 PM PST by dc-zoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trebb
how better to alienate all but the most die-hard commie wackos from the Dim party?

Lots of Dems are not wacked out commies, just wrong on some key issues. My husband is one: he almost always votes Dem, and personally dislikes Pres. Bush, but absolutely can't stand Dean and really fears for our country if he should win. So, he's been grousing lately that he's going to have to vote Republic. If marriage has taught me anything, it's to keep my mouth shut at key moments. When you win the battle, just smile quietly and enjoy the victory.

48 posted on 01/09/2004 12:22:01 PM PST by twigs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: irgbar-man
I love Nixon. Out of all the US Presidents, he remains my favorit. I would rank him above Abraham Lincoln!
49 posted on 01/09/2004 12:24:31 PM PST by philosofy123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
"Four years ago, I didn't really understand the Iowa caucuses," Dean said during the day.

And four years from today, Dean will be saying "I didn't really understand that Americans would support the war against terrorism."

50 posted on 01/09/2004 12:31:53 PM PST by BushisTheMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief
"Harkin? I thought he died a few years ago."

Oh, be still, my heart. However, sorry to say, the evil, vicious Harken is still with us. Even if he did die, Iowa has a democrat gov. at present so another rat would simply fill the slot.

51 posted on 01/09/2004 12:38:23 PM PST by Irene Adler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
Oh Meek, is that not the dream team for a trouncing?

HA! Howard Dean and Barney Frank. LMAO!
52 posted on 01/09/2004 12:42:27 PM PST by onyx (Your secrets are safe with me and all my friends.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
Tom Harkin on Iraq and the Gulf War

"The Gulf War was like teenage sex. We got in too soon and out too soon".

53 posted on 01/09/2004 12:43:03 PM PST by KQQL (^@__*^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ken5050
"Iowa is strange....any state that elects Harkin AND Grassley, and keeps re-electing them..is politically psychotic...that's the oddest pair of senators I can recall.."

This is very true, and I live in Iowa. Iowa has many sort of moderate-conservatives and also a strong, old-timey farmer-labor tradition, as well. A candidate who gets a real committment from either side of the spectrum can do well in Iowa. Also, I have noticed for years that Iowans simply LOVE incumbents. If you manage to win once, and you take care of the home folks when they call your office with their problems, you often can hang on for a long, long time.

54 posted on 01/09/2004 12:44:58 PM PST by Irene Adler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

Tom Harkin Spits On U.S. Military

From the Des Moines Register, Iowa Senator Tom Harkin: "What we were told and what you saw in the press last fall and earlier this year is that he had a massive war machine. It looks now like this was just a Third World country - there were people fighting with tennis shoes on, on the Iraqi side.

I don't know what else we're going to find, but they didn't fly even one airplane in the air. They had almost nothing. So if they were that weak, where we could just roll over them like that, tell me again how he was such a big threat in the past?"

http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_041103/content/stack_b.guest.html



55 posted on 01/09/2004 12:51:10 PM PST by KQQL (^@__*^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: JohnnyZ
**I think in some places, like South Carolina, Dean can only reach a certain ceiling, beyond which it'll be all anti-Dean (at least with white voters).**


The problem with your theory in South Carolina is that Clark will split the "anti-Dean" vote with John Edwards. I think a Dean win in Iowa almost assures him the nomination and a probable win even in some of the southern states.
56 posted on 01/09/2004 12:55:11 PM PST by GmbyMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Irene Adler
Thanks for the info..and Iowans also have the most nicely drawn congressional districts....all straight lines...the gerrymander is not native to the state..
57 posted on 01/09/2004 1:06:20 PM PST by ken5050
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
Hey you know what? Dean's crazy. Harkin doesn't even live in Iowa. He lives in the Bahamas. If Dean would look at the following link even he would puke:

http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/tribune-review/opinion/datelinedc/s_155912.html
58 posted on 01/09/2004 1:12:27 PM PST by TomHarkinIsNotFromIowa (Foe Hammer!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GmbyMan
The problem with your theory in South Carolina is that Clark will split the "anti-Dean" vote with John Edwards.

Now I wouldn't go so far as to say my theory has problems. I said Dean's support among southern whites has a ceiling, certainly less than half, maybe 20-25%. He may, however, get black support, as he has been picking up endorsements from the Cong. Black Caucus. I think blacks are the key to South Carolina, and which way they go will determine who wins. Will they vote for the liberal, Dean? Clinton's man Clark? Or, if he's still around, Clyburn's man Gephardt? Some will go Lieberman, since he's a Believer and they've already voted for him once.

I don't think Edwards will do very well in South Carolina, maybe 10-15%, and much worse everywhere else, where he's polling 3%; I think he'll get no momentum from Iowa and New Hampshire.

59 posted on 01/09/2004 1:12:29 PM PST by JohnnyZ (I pity the fool who thinks Bush's proposal is the same as amnesty!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
Dung heap likes the Hobbitt, huh?
60 posted on 01/09/2004 1:13:52 PM PST by swampfox98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson