Posted on 12/08/2003 12:16:58 PM PST by PureSolace
All week long I've been talking with other students at the school I go to about the pros and cons of the Patriot Act, and I was wondering if any freepers had any information to contribute. Does anyone have a list of success stories or embarrassments because of the Patriot Act? From the searches that I've done it seems most of the websites on the net are anti Patriot Act because they say it can be abused and target regular everyday citizens, and even peaceful protesters? (That one baffled me) Anyway, Any information or insight you guys can give would be wonderful. Thanks :)
That is pure horse $hit
"My job is graphics so save the whining."
What are you a Marine or a graphic artist. Make up your mind?!?!
You are misinformed. You are baseless if you cannot respond with content. You are not and will never be part of the solution.
You do not represent "your generation". Most of them can have a discussion without immediately breaking down into diatribe and attack on characters about whom you know nothing.
You are one of the "jackbooted thugs": you would lay waste to any who do not share your unfounded and undereducated opinions.
I think I can do better, how about I source my results for you.
The Free Market (reprinted in Mises.org) 3/94 Ron Paul " For example, most people probably believe that the government attacked the Waco Christians because they were "stockpiling" weapons. Were they? Texans own 60 million firearms, about 3.5 per person. At Mt. Carmel there were two firearms per person, most of them locked away. The rest of their protection consisted of hay bales and plywood. The stockpiling accusation was an act of projection, for the real stockpiler was the government. In the attack on Waco, agents used M113 personnel carriers, M2AO Bradley fighting vehicles, Sikorsky Blackhawks, Apache and UH-1 Bell helicopters, Abrams MI tanks, 7.62nim machine guns, FBI SWAT snipers, two varieties of hand grenades, and the FBI's psychological warfare experts. The government even fired canisters of CS gas, banned in warfare by international treaty, through windows and walls...."
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Public Action, Inc. 12/30/99 Carol Valentine " . Lee Hancock is a reporter for the Dallas Morning News. From March 1, 1993 onward, her by-line appeared on many FBI disinformation pieces on Waco that masqueraded as "news stories." Of particular interest is her article of April 15, 1993, "No easy answers, law authorities puzzle over methods to end Branch Davidian siege." In the body of the article, Hancock casually mentions FBI plans to assassinate David Koresh: Note the fourth paragraph, which has been capitalized for emphasis. "WACO--For the armchair tactician, forcing an end to the 46-day Branch Davidian standoff might sound easy enough.
"Lob tear gas or other chemical agents in until the Branch Davidians are too incapacitated to fight and have no choice but to stagger out to waiting agents.
"Expose and limit their hiding places by crushing outer walls of the cult's sprawling Mount Carmel compound with . Bradley fighting vehicles and 37-ton Abrams M-1 tanks.
Now please tell me of one source other than you that has ever mentioned that this photo has been manipulated. Otherwise I must assume that you are the sole person on earth whith this "theory". I await your response...
WorldNetDaily.com Thursday, October 16, 2003
".....West Point graduate Joseph Mehrten Jr. tells Insight, "Clark had to have knowledge about the plan because there is no way anyone could have gotten combat vehicles off that base without his OK. The M1A1 Abrams armor is classified 'Secret,' and maybe even 'Top Secret,' and if it was deployed as muscle for something like Waco there would have been National Firearms Act weapons issues. Each of these M1A1 Abrams vehicles is armed with a 125-millimeter cannon, a 50-caliber machine gun and two 30-caliber machine guns, which are all very heavily controlled items, requiring controls much like a chain of legal custody. It is of critical importance that such vehicles could not have been moved for use at Waco without Clark's knowledge....."
And after reading more than half of this thread, it's clear that VaBthang4 is pure statist, tyrannist fodder. What a tool -- useful idiot.
From his profile page...
VaBthang4 is the arrogant looking "fellow" on the left. Put him in a brown shirt and he'd resemble Goebbels, or that NAZI guy in Raiders of the Lost Ark (you know, the guy who picked up the hot metal artifact and burned its design into the palm of his hand?)
"...Between August 1992 and April 1994, Clark was commander of the 1st Cavalry Division of the Army's III Corps at Fort Hood, Texas. !!!According to a report by the U.S. Department of the Treasury, the list of military personnel and equipment used at Waco included: 15 active-duty military personnel, 13 Texas National Guard personnel, nine Bradley fighting vehicles, five combat-engineer vehicles, one tank-retrieval vehicle and two M1A1 Abrams tanks.!!!Additionally, Fort Hood reportedly was used for much of the training for the bloody attack on the Davidians and their children...."
Nothing like Freepers calling the kettle black.
Did they seal the border with Mexico? When did that happen? The myopia of the INS will prove to be as fatal to our Republic as the headlong rush to instill the domestic sharia law you so favour.
The education of our young has been sorely neglected in those sorry government reeducation centers.
Now look at who insists upon answers. You are in desperate need of consistency, among other things.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.