Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lieberman takes on jelly doughnuts
AP ^ | 12/5/2003 | AP

Posted on 12/05/2003 7:40:12 AM PST by playball0

Lieberman takes on jelly doughnuts Associated Press

Warning: Jelly doughnuts may be hazardous to your child's health. That's what Democratic presidential candidate Joe Lieberman is telling America's parents as he seeks a federal investigation into the marketing practices of junk food companies.

THE CONNECTICUT senator, who led the fight to put parental warnings on movie, video game and music advertising, wants the Federal Trade Commission to determine whether there is a connection between junk food advertising and the rise in obesity among youngsters. "I like doughnuts. I like sweets. I like candy," Lieberman said Thursday. "I'm not saying if you eat a jelly doughnut or have a high-sugar bottle of soda, you're going to get sick, but if you have too many it's going to affect your health."

As president, Lieberman would push for three interim moves while the FTC conducts its study:

--Require junk food advertisements to include nutritional information that somehow issues a warning to parents, much like movie ads are accompanied by parental ratings.

--Ask Congress to require restaurant chains to include nutritional information on menus and mini-boards. There already is a bill pending in Congress to do this.

--Empower the Agriculture Department to set standards for food sold in schools, primarily vending machines. The USDA currently regulates lunch menus, but there are no limits on what companies can sell kids through vending machines.

Lieberman's campaign officials said the senator will not define what junk food is, leaving that to dietary and health care experts.

In the 1990s and into the 2000 presidential campaign, Lieberman spurred an FTC investigation into the marketing practices of the movie, video game and music industries. Aides say he has found a similar pattern with food advertising: Companies are marketing unhealthy products to children too young to read.

While parents can refuse to bring junk food into their homes, advertisements prompt demands from the youngest children and make it more likely that they will buy the products -- sometimes in schools -- as soon as they get enough money of their own, Lieberman aides said.

The federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has declared obesity the top health issue in America. It estimates that 15 percent of children are overweight.

The announcement is part of a weeklong project by Lieberman to push family friendly initiatives.

On Wednesday in Manchester, N.H., he proposed expanding the Family and Medical Leave Act, the Clinton-era program that allows up to 12 weeks of family leave per year without pay.

Under Lieberman's plan, employees would pay about $1 per week into a program that would provide up to four weeks of leave at half pay.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: doughnuts; junkfood; lieberman
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last
This is what it takes to get in the papers. The proposal is disgusting. It's a sop to get contributions from the trial lawyers.
1 posted on 12/05/2003 7:40:12 AM PST by playball0
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: playball0
He's not a liberal. Really.
2 posted on 12/05/2003 7:45:32 AM PST by facedown (Armed in the Heartland)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: playball0
Ich bin ein Berliner?
3 posted on 12/05/2003 7:46:29 AM PST by formercalifornian (Daschle who?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: playball0
Lieberman takes on jelly doughnuts

If it's going to be a fist fight...I'll put 20 on the jelly donuts.
4 posted on 12/05/2003 7:50:00 AM PST by mr.pink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: playball0
Keep your stinking hands off my DOUGHNUTS!

Liberals.

Good Grief.

>: [
5 posted on 12/05/2003 7:51:01 AM PST by Mr. Thorne ("But iron, cold iron, shall be master of them all..." Kipling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: playball0
Lieberman takes on jelly doughnuts

I've seen him take them on in 2 debates this fall.

6 posted on 12/05/2003 7:52:24 AM PST by CaptRon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: playball0
He's going to p*ss off the cops with that one...
7 posted on 12/05/2003 7:53:56 AM PST by Pharmboy (Dems lie 'cause they have to...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: playball0
Mmmm - donuts.
8 posted on 12/05/2003 7:53:57 AM PST by reagan_fanatic (Ain't Skeered...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: formercalifornian
Hanukah is around the corner' And its a costume to eat dohgnots then
9 posted on 12/05/2003 7:54:17 AM PST by yoely
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: playball0
Under Lieberman's plan, employees would pay about $1 per week into a program that would provide up to four weeks of leave at half pay.

What about the $550 a month I already pay in medical insurance or the $8,000 a year I pay in federal taxes or the $2400 I pay in property taxes. What about the Social Security and Medicare taxes or the state sales tax? Wow. Isn't he smart? He came up with another tax idea. Does anyone think this program would stay at $1 per week per employee? Let's see, an employer has 25 employees. That would be $1200 per year into this fund. How many of you think $1200 would cover the costs of providing this level of protection to employees? How many of you think $1200 would cover the Federal Paperwork involved in handling one claim?

10 posted on 12/05/2003 7:56:26 AM PST by Richard Kimball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
He's going to p*ss off the cops with that one...

One time when I was a teenager, I was at my brother's house. We were watching a horror movie with one of my brother's buddies. They were both cops at the time. One of the characters got into trouble, of course, and my brother's friend, trying to be funny, said, "Where's a cop when you need one?" To which I replied "They're down the street at the donut shop" They both about fell out of their chairs laughing.

11 posted on 12/05/2003 7:58:27 AM PST by BSunday (Too lazy to read the whole thread, or even past the first couple.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Thorne
idiots
12 posted on 12/05/2003 8:02:00 AM PST by petercooper (Proud VRWC Neanderthal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: BSunday
My dad was a cop and my son is a cop...and they could always laugh a bit about that.
13 posted on 12/05/2003 8:09:51 AM PST by Pharmboy (Dems lie 'cause they have to...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Thorne
They'll get my doughnut when they pry it from my cold dead hands.

Doesn't the 2nd amendment preserve the right to bear claws?
14 posted on 12/05/2003 8:12:44 AM PST by baraboolaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: playball0
Bush and the Republicans are in the pocket of the Big Doughnut Companies - Krispy Kreme and Drunken Doughnuts - who push their addictive products on the weakest among us - women, children, cops and Homer Simpson.
15 posted on 12/05/2003 8:14:36 AM PST by dmcnash
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: baraboolaw
the right to bear claws...

That's just terrible....

16 posted on 12/05/2003 8:23:07 AM PST by Baraboo Law Jr.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: playball0
As consumers, before we buy products, it is a good thing to know something about the products. I don't mind at all that food is required to have nutritional information. This conservative does not see an erosion of the Constitution. For those who say that parents are responsible for their children, not the government, this will make it a little easier for them to make decisions for their children. I don't know that I like the idea of be a big neon warning, but I do like having the info.
17 posted on 12/05/2003 8:24:41 AM PST by doug from upland (Hillary would get 100% of the Islamist Terrorist vote)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
I don't know that I like the idea of be a big neon warning, but I do like having the info.

Well formulated and presented response. Kudos for great common sense.

18 posted on 12/05/2003 8:27:32 AM PST by Glenn (What were you thinking, Al?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
I don't mind the warnings, but what a platform for "the Conscience of the Senate"?? Oh, how the mighty have fallen. He sold his soul and he's having a very hard time getting it back.
19 posted on 12/05/2003 8:31:52 AM PST by Ann Archy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
Off topic, but what happened to the indictment of Aaron Tonkin (sp?) the felon friend of the Clintons??
20 posted on 12/05/2003 8:33:04 AM PST by Ann Archy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson