Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Limbaugh med records seized

Posted on 12/04/2003 9:51:01 AM PST by longtermmemmory

more to follow


TOPICS: Breaking News
KEYWORDS: cantbehisfault; classenvy; clintonprosecutor; demsdirtytricks; dontblamerush; doper; doperenablers; fishingexpedition; gulliblesupporters; hewassetup; junkie; leftwingconspiracy; limbaugh; lovablefuzzball; medical; medicalrecords; palmbeachpayback; pilingon; politicalwitchunt; reductioadabsurdum; rush; rushbashing; rushisblameless; rushlimbaugh; smearcampaign; suckersforrush; talkradio; whenwasthesurgery; wildgoosechase; wodlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 361-380381-400401-420 ... 441-455 next last
To: Right_in_Virginia
If you want medical privacy, then either don't hide your addiction by visiting many doctors, or don't have credible evidence that would suggest such activity or change the drug laws.

Does this make sense to you?

Does your question make sense to you?(Vague questions get aswered with more vague questions)

381 posted on 12/04/2003 8:04:11 PM PST by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 378 | View Replies]

To: woofie
What is the niacin question? I take it


Don't know..... I think it was one he was getting scripts for but I think they were more interested in the pain killers not Niacin.....
382 posted on 12/04/2003 8:05:12 PM PST by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 377 | View Replies]

To: MEGoody
So the customer is responsible for the bank asking them to do something they wouldn't know was against the law? Interesting. It would seem that the bank could then be held civily liable if a customer was prosecuted.

Actually, the customer is not liable in such a case, the banker is. The specific violation is recommending that the customer structure transactions to deliberately avoid the reporting requirements.

383 posted on 12/04/2003 8:06:56 PM PST by RebelBanker (Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: Central Scrutiniser
Oh please, build a shrine for Rush and light some candles.

Am I entitled to admire a man without being accused of worshiping him? Exaggerating a person's opinion is a horribly dishonest way to attempt to win a debate.

He is an entertainer, he does schtick on the radio. He is a DJ that found the right schtick and he started to believe in it when he started making some dough.

Not according to those that know him. He grew up in an extremely conservative household in Cape Girardeau. His father was an attorney who impressed his conservative ideology on Rush at a very young age, according to all the sources I could find.

And who are you to decide for another where his heart is? Do you have some special talent to see into another's soul that the rest of us lack?

But then, Rush forgot what the real world was, he spent his time surrounded by sycophantic yes men, flew in private jets and chauffered limos around town, started hanging out with the beautiful people

My goodness. This sounds more like the class-envy 'hating the rich' speech I have learned to expect from liberals. Certainly you have not succumbed to such a deadly sin.

and became a junkie, all the while lying to his adoring but blind fans. Now he is spinning again to keep his butt out of prison. I hope he recovers, but I can't believe a damn thing this guy says.

Then never believe anything I say ever again, and hold me in equal contempt, for I am a recovering cocaine addict.

When you discard people for such things, you yourself appear smaller -- not Rush. Not myself.

Only people who do NOT address their addictions can be faulted, called morally weak, and 'discarded'. Those of us who are overcoming these problems are much stronger and certainly of great value to society.

I find that Rush's contributions to the conservative cause are strong and valuable. I will not throw him under the bus. You may if you wish, but it does not reflect well upon you.

384 posted on 12/04/2003 8:14:59 PM PST by Lazamataz (In spite of the cost of living, it's still popular.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 364 | View Replies]

To: woofie
"What is the niacin question? I take it"

It was said in an article above that part of the Rx's were for niacin for his cholesterol.

I said that it seemed odd or something to that effect that there was an Rx for niacin since my doctor just told me I could go buy it over the counter to lower my cholesterol.
I politely told her "NO" since niacin causes people to have hot flashes."

385 posted on 12/04/2003 8:17:35 PM PST by Spunky (This little tag just keeps following me where ever I go.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 377 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Not to put too fine a point on it, but if he DID have a legitimate reason for taking the drugs, why was he buying them on the blackmarket? It seems that his own doctors would have given him the prescriptions if he needed them.

Doctors don't always provide patients with the meds needed to stop their suffering.

Ask relatives of people who've had family members dying of cancer how difficult it can be sometimes to get the Doctors to give them the meds they need to even sleep at night.

386 posted on 12/04/2003 8:21:32 PM PST by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
He is a Limosene Conservative, and you are blinded by your shared politics to see that he has been flim-flamming you. I feel bad that he got hooked on pills, I hope he gets well, but all the while, he was lying to his adoring fans, and all the while, every step in this affair, his blinded fans have denied everything, only to find out later they were wrong. So, given that, I don't trust the guy, I think he is an opportunist and a BS artist.

As for what you think of me, don't trot out all your crap about me, you or I are not the subjects of this debate, the subject is the fact that so many around here refuse to see that Rush has hoodwinked them all along, and they still blindly follow him. But god forbid that a powerful liberal be an addict, they would be riding on them all the time.

The hypocrisy is so thick you could cut it with a plastic knife...

BTW, I never believed anything you said here when you were using...:)

387 posted on 12/04/2003 8:24:34 PM PST by Central Scrutiniser (Which is the most universal human characteristic? Fear or Laziness?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 384 | View Replies]

To: wingnuts'nbolts
Sorry, but. but with respect for the cya, bull! When making deposits my bank hs advised that they be under 10k so they don't have to be reported. In or out what's the difference. They either want to know where I got the $$ or where I'm taking the $$? None of their business! Rush did nothing wrong and neither did the bank that paid the fine rather than put up with the bureaucratic extortion.

With all due respect, that was not bull and not cya, that is the law. Every bank officer in the country is required to be trained on this and sign a form that they have received this training. I think all this is part and parcel of banks having insurance provided by the FDIC; you want your deposits to have insurance backed by the full faith and credit of the United States, we have to submit to some (sometimes onerous) regulations.

If you are borrowing money, we are obligated to find out what you plan on doing with it since that impacts the probability of it being repaid. If you are depositing money, we are required to take some steps to determine where it came from. Thus far, those requirements are pretty light - we just have to make sure you are not on a "known bad guy" list. The only type of transaction we really do not care too much about is if you are withdrawing your own money; there we only have to report if you are taking large amounts of cash.

388 posted on 12/04/2003 8:24:50 PM PST by RebelBanker (Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 285 | View Replies]

To: Jorge
I understand that completely.

He isn't dying, is he?
389 posted on 12/04/2003 8:24:59 PM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 386 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
My goodness. This sounds more like the class-envy 'hating the rich' speech I have learned to expect from liberals. Certainly you have not succumbed to such a deadly sin.

There seems to be quite a few posters who are upset at Rush's finances here on these threads. Several snide remarks about his money, limos, mansions etc. I thought that was odd. Bless you Laz, you are a class act..

390 posted on 12/04/2003 8:25:28 PM PST by ladyinred (The Left have blood on their hands!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 384 | View Replies]

To: Spunky
Other than that I think someone thought he thanked family and friends for standing by him but we weren't sure if family included Marta as he never specifically said he thanked his wife, Marta for standing by him.

I suspect there is an 'issue' here.

391 posted on 12/04/2003 8:27:10 PM PST by Lazamataz (In spite of the cost of living, it's still popular.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 376 | View Replies]

To: B-Chan
It needs honest men who can admit to human weaknesses (their own, and those of the people they admire) and yet remain faithful to the ideals that we all imperfectly pusue.

Have you listened to Rush any since he returned?

392 posted on 12/04/2003 8:28:49 PM PST by Republican Wildcat (November 4, 2003. The day the 32-year Democrat lock on Kentucky came to an end.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Renaissance
Sounds like the law in Big Brotherland or maybe in Never-neverland. Or maybe the law in an America where the inmates are in control of asylum.

No argument here! However, advising someone to break the law (no matter how goofy that law may be) is generally not a good idea, especially in an industry as tightly regulated as banking.

393 posted on 12/04/2003 8:32:25 PM PST by RebelBanker (Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
"I suspect there is an 'issue' here."

I have a feeling there is also. In fact before the drug issue became known I mentioned to my husband that I felt something was wrong because all of a sudden Rush quit talking about Marta.

394 posted on 12/04/2003 8:36:55 PM PST by Spunky (This little tag just keeps following me where ever I go.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 391 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory
Hardball - The DA in charge of this case is an outspoken Democrat.
Guests on the show pretty much said it's a witch hunt. They're digging hoping to find something on him.
It's the key to their 15 minutes of fame.

If they do accuse Rish of something, wouldn't the law have to go after all the other entertainers in Hollywood for their illegal drug abuse and rehab as well?

395 posted on 12/04/2003 8:37:20 PM PST by concerned about politics ( "Satire". It's Just "Satire.".......So it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alnick
Oxycontin is said to be extremely addictive. Lots of people become addicted due to being prescribed Oxycontin by good doctors, apparently.

FOX reported 2,000,000 people got addicted to this stuff by doctors when this story first broke.

396 posted on 12/04/2003 8:41:12 PM PST by concerned about politics ( "Satire". It's Just "Satire.".......So it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Central Scrutiniser
He is a Limosene Conservative,

I hope to become one myself. Will I expect that you will dump me out the window when I am?

and you are blinded by your shared politics to see that he has been flim-flamming you.

I know he was flim-flamming people, myself included. People in active addiction do that. While it does not thrill me, I understand it, and as long as he truly embraces recovery, I have no lasting anger at it. I would only be upset if I were to find that THIS RECOVERY is faked.

So, given that, I don't trust the guy, I think he is an opportunist and a BS artist.

I think that people who have been there, who have been addicted and are now in recovery understand the active addict better. We lie to use. It's what we do.

I would no sooner condemn Rush for the very behavior I exhibited, as pull out my eyes.

Rush can recover, and I will not condemn him now for his active addiction then.

397 posted on 12/04/2003 8:43:35 PM PST by Lazamataz (In spite of the cost of living, it's still popular.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 387 | View Replies]

To: Spunky
2,100 divided by 184 = 11.41 pills per day.

That is not very many pills if it includes all of the above mentioned. My husband takes that many.

Heck, that's sounds normal! I know a lady who claims to be "too nervious to work" who said about a week ago she takes 11 pills a day for "nerves."
I can imagine what she'd take if she had back surgery! 100?
I had no idea Limbaugh took so little.
The press made it sound like much more than that. I'm suprised how they blew it that far out of perportion - even for the press.

398 posted on 12/04/2003 8:46:30 PM PST by concerned about politics ( "Satire". It's Just "Satire.".......So it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 351 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
I would no sooner condemn Rush for the very behavior I exhibited, as pull out my eyes.

Though, if you do pull out your eyes, you'll find the cluster of connective tissue and nerves closely resemble Ramen noodles.

399 posted on 12/04/2003 8:47:57 PM PST by Petronski (Living life in a minor key.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 397 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics
they only care about finding "something" on rush which puts him outside the perview of drug court. They could have charged him with what they had but that would automatically send him to drug court.

The have singled rush out because he is rush. Nothing less.
400 posted on 12/04/2003 8:48:00 PM PST by longtermmemmory (Vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 395 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 361-380381-400401-420 ... 441-455 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson