1 posted on
12/01/2003 3:44:06 PM PST by
quidnunc
To: quidnunc
Clark is delusional!
2 posted on
12/01/2003 3:47:25 PM PST by
PhiKapMom
(AOII Mom -- OU Sooners are #1)
To: quidnunc
Bwahahaha!
From the article.
You probably get the flavor of what Wesley Clark is saying, too. It tastes, as THE SCRAPBOOK pointed out three weeks ago, like baloney. And sometimes, as in the case of yesterday's interview with Blitzer, it tastes like three-week-old baloney.
3 posted on
12/01/2003 3:48:08 PM PST by
tet68
To: quidnunc
Can't wait to see him on the stump, eyes bugging out of his head, and talking about how "the JOOOOOOooooos" control everything.
4 posted on
12/01/2003 3:49:55 PM PST by
Poohbah
("Beware the fury of a patient man" -- John Dryden)
To: quidnunc
Hey I think I wrote that list! I'd be happy to write it again!
5 posted on
12/01/2003 3:50:51 PM PST by
thoughtomator
(Real Americans have no reason to hyphenate!)
To: quidnunc
And the problem with taking action in Syria would be ...?
If Clark is right, doesn't it undercut the U.S. to reveal and criticize a future military action?
6 posted on
12/01/2003 3:51:14 PM PST by
Williams
To: quidnunc
Fortunately for our side, most conservatives are familiar with tinfoil hats; how to make them, and how and when to use them. Liberals have yet to learn these important lessons, so they are thrall to the secret emanations of the conspiracy theorists, resulting in the kind of paranoid delusional behavior exhibited here.
Hey, General! Git yer hat on!
To: quidnunc
General Confusion
8 posted on
12/01/2003 3:52:45 PM PST by
RWR8189
To: quidnunc
What's more, Clark added, "the administration's never disavowed this intent." I heard a rumor the US is preparing to invade Canada. And incredibly, they've never disavowed it! Warmongers!
To: quidnunc
This guy's full of it. All the "facts" he's been citing are based on rumours and gossips. Wonder how he's made his 4 stars.
I'm sure glad he's no longer running our military.
To: quidnunc
Strawberries anyone?
12 posted on
12/01/2003 4:04:25 PM PST by
billorites
(freepo ergo sum)
To: quidnunc
Clark said not for the first time that the Bush administration's war plans extend far beyond Iraq. Small potatoes eh, Weasley? Not like going for the gusto and attacking Russia. That would take a real man(iac). Juices, Wes, guard them juices.
13 posted on
12/01/2003 4:08:12 PM PST by
ctonious
("Own all nine Bush-Basher Bots! On sale at all DNC outlets!")
To: quidnunc
This man should not be called a general, he is a disgrace, and has a worse temper then psycho Dean..... Now that would be a ticket, "Dean Clark 2004, the absolute cause of the nuclear war!!"
16 posted on
12/01/2003 4:13:10 PM PST by
Porterville
(We are watching you liberal scum, soon we will take your welfare check, then we will take your home)
To: quidnunc
If the administration felt the need to "disavow" all the nonsense Wesley dreams up, they'd have to hire a full time Senior Administrative Disavower.
To: quidnunc
He is nuts.
To: quidnunc
And if they have? So what? Did the President not vow to go after terrorists and the nations who harbor them? I expect this to go on to another country. What is the big freaking deal Clark? Do you understand yet the threat to our security? It is because of the appeasement of your party that we are in this mess to begin with. God deliver us from a democrat in charge or we are doomed.
25 posted on
12/01/2003 9:03:53 PM PST by
ladyinred
(The Left have blood on their hands!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson