Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Murder of a President; The murder of a president and the death of a constitution
The Libertarian Enterprise ^ | Nov 23, 2003 | by Patrick K Martin

Posted on 11/24/2003 8:09:37 PM PST by Jack Black

The Murder of a President; and the death of a constitution by Patrick K Martin

Exclusive to TLE

As we approach the anniversary of the assassination of John F Kennedy, and subsequently suffer the deluge of documentaries and retrospectives which always accompany such a date. I am struck, not so much by the facts of the crime in question, but rather the public response to it and the subsequent cover-up. Now, for myself, I don’t remember that day in Dallas, mostly because I wasn’t alive at the time (having been born almost three years later), but like all Americans of my generation and later, I have spent a lifetime seeing it in film, reading about it in books, and hearing the endless stories that old people (well, old-er people anyway) tell of "The Day Kennedy was Shot".

The basic facts of the case are simple, on November 22, 1963, John F Kennedy 35th president of the united States of America was shot dead in Dallas Texas. The president’s death was the result of a lone assassin until 1979 when the House Committee on Assassinations determined that the death was the work of a conspiracy of persons unknown. One 6.5mm Mannlicher-Carcano rifle, fitted with a 4x optical sight, fired all three bullets used in the shooting, including the "Magic-bullet" that made three 90degree turns (and stopped at least twice in flight to meet the time-line) while inflicting seven wounds on the president and Texas governor John Connally, finally coming to rest on a stretcher in Parkland Hospital, at least according to the Warren commission report (I don’t remember if officialdom changed their mind on that one later). Lee Oswald, the reputed assassin, was seen six floors below the window where the fatal shot was reportedly fired about two minutes afterwards, calmly drinking a Coke-a-Cola, having ditched the rifle on the opposite side of the room from the window used to shoot from . . .

The list is endless, evidence was ignored, proper police procedure was neglected at all levels, forensic evidence was either never gathered, lost, stolen, corrupted, or dismissed. Add to that the seeming propensity of witnesses to drop dead of heart attacks, one vehicle crashes, and other less than common causes. All the evidence is sealed, except for the stuff like JFK’s brain which was lost/stolen from the national archives in 1965\66, or destroyed like the bloodstains in the limo which were washed away by the Secret Service while they waited outside Parkland Hospital. Even the eyewitnesses, the people who saw the shooting, the doctors who attempted to save the president, the people who put the body in the coffin, the people who unloaded it at Walter Reed Hospital and assisted with the autopsy, all agree that the governments’ story (or at least significant parts thereof) is bullshit and most Americans agree.

So what have we done about it? Nothing. Oh sure, people bitch and write books and call for the government to release the information it has and conduct a full and complete investigation. Investigate who? Why the people involved with the assassination of course, the Cubans, or maybe the Mafia, or was it the CIA, or LBJ and his clique of right-wing oil barons, or whoever is the villain-de jour this month (my money is on LBJ and the barons). Or how about the people who covered it all up, you know, the people who have been lying to us about the whole mess. People like Lyndon Johnson, J Edger Hoover, Gerald Ford, Allan Dulles, sure they are all dead now but we can still dig up the dirt right? I’m sure that people like Senator Arlan Spector (inventor of the ‘Magic-Bullet’ theory) will be happy to admit that the Warren commission was actively involved in a criminal conspiracy to cover up the facts of the murder of an American President. Hey, I bet Edward Kennedy will be happy to stand up and demand that the facts come out, he’s probably just waited thirty years because it might bring up bad memories (this is probably the reason he said nothing about the cover-up of his brother Robert Kennedy’s murder too), I’m sure he is over all that by now.

Well, I could go on trying to be funny about it, but I won’t. The fact of the matter is that we, the American people have been lied too for forty years, and we all know it. It doesn’t matter who pulled that trigger or triggers in Dallas, because the important part is that members of the US government and it’s agents and agencies have participated in a conspiracy to cover it up. The FBI, the CIA, the US Military, or at least the higher ups in these organizations at the time, helped to carry out a coup in this country, and we all know it. The downfall of our constitution happened on the day that the president died. The welfare/warfare state created by LBJ and the others who assisted in this crime persists to this day and drags us all ever closer to total slavery, and America knows it.

For forty years we have been dragged through Vietnam, the war on (some) drugs, radical environmentalism, the oil crises, welfare, inflation, the loss of our constitutional rights at all levels and we have done nothing. We have not rioted, we have not risen up, we have not hanged any congress-critters, refused to pay taxes, refused to sit on juries, refused to keep feeding the juggernaut that is grinding away the ideals that are America. Oh sure, a few people have acted, and too many of us applauded as these malcontents were dealt with by the minions of law-enforcement. Most of us however have sat on our butts, whining about the injustice of it all as we watch our money being stolen from us, our kids indoctrinated and our rights ignored. Why, because we all know that no matter how much we believe in the power of the individual, no matter how dedicated we are to freedom, we also know that raw physical force is one thing that is cumulative and it’s on their side, not ours.

So we sit, and we cry, and we curse the cowards that have stolen our land and we hope that one day the world will change because we wish it. I just wish I had the guts to change it myself, but I doubt it.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: assassination; constitution; jfk
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last
I'm not sure I agree with the premise that the death of JFK was a key milestone in the death of the Constitution but it is still an interesting article.
1 posted on 11/24/2003 8:09:37 PM PST by Jack Black
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: archy; Jeff Head; Travis McGee
FYI.
2 posted on 11/24/2003 8:11:03 PM PST by Jack Black
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack Black; potlatch
Wow! Fine post. That about sums it up.
3 posted on 11/24/2003 8:17:02 PM PST by ntnychik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jack Black
I don't remember the Constitution authorizing the VP having the President assassinated.
4 posted on 11/24/2003 8:17:03 PM PST by per loin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack Black
I don't disagree with what the author says, but when anyone does that much complaining I have a question I ask.

Your solution is?

5 posted on 11/24/2003 8:19:09 PM PST by c-b 1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack Black
, including the "Magic-bullet" that made three 90degree turns (and stopped at least twice in flight to meet the time-line) while inflicting seven wounds on the president and Texas governor John Connally, finally coming to rest on a stretcher in Parkland Hospital, at least according to the Warren commission report (I don’t remember if officialdom changed their mind on that one later)

Then why, Patrick, if you can't "remember" major facts of the case, are you wasting your ink, and our time, with your ill informed opinions on the matter?

6 posted on 11/24/2003 8:19:29 PM PST by Stultis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: c-b 1
but when anyone does that much complaining I have a question I ask.

Your solution is?

Solution? I couldn't even find that the article has a (cogent) point. It reads like an answer to an essay question by a student who didn't read the assigned chapters. Apparently Pat had a column due, and it was the JFK aniversary, so he just whipped out some speculation (and misinformation) no more informative that what you might here from a Cliff Claven type holding forth at the local tavern.

7 posted on 11/24/2003 8:24:17 PM PST by Stultis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Jack Black
I recall a few years ago, an analysis of the kennedy shooting was done in the International Wound Ballistic Review. I coughed up the 12 dollars for the issue.

The Mannlicher Carcano is not a bad little rifle. Its action is pretty slick, with rounds in the magazine, but rattles and has a bolt stop when empty. The results: It was not a real feat of marksmanship, easily duplicated within the available time. You must remember, the shooter started with a loaded gun, and missed the first shot! The study used the author's son as a representative shooter, and as I remember, he was 14 years old.

The cadaver(s) shot showed similar wounds to that of Kennedy and Connelly. The reaction of Kennedy to the first round that hit him is classic: a nervous reaction to having the spine severed. Elbows go to shoulder heighth, and the back arches. That is a far better explanation of his movement than being hit by a round from "the grassy knoll". Bullets are small, light, and move fast through flesh. Motion transfer in a cadaver, aside from movies, is not apparent.

The bullets, selected from the same lot of ammunition used by the shooter in Dallas, penetrated the spine, and then a second thorax was recovered and had even less damage than the bullet recovered from governor connally's stretcher. The cadaver's tie was nicked similarly to that of Kennedy. The bullets pitched in flesh in a manner similar to that described by the Warren Commision report.

The big problem? Kennedy was so gosh darned pretty that it offends our harmony to this very day, that a single bum could off him.

Jack Ruby arrived in dallas after Oswald was supposed to be moved, not what you would expect if there was a professional hit. For some reason, the move was delayed, giving Ruby a chance to be there.
8 posted on 11/24/2003 8:31:25 PM PST by donmeaker (Duty is the most sublime word in the English language.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jack Black
I have spent a lifetime seeing it in film, reading about it in books...

And that's your problem. There's a lot of nonsense in those books.

The basic facts of the case are simple...

He then goes on to demonstrate that he doesn't know them.

The president’s death was the result of a lone assassin until 1979 when the House Committee on Assassinations determined that the death was the work of a conspiracy of persons unknown.

The House reached that conclusion on the basis of the soundly debunked acoustic evidence. In all other major respects they agreed with the Warren Commission.

...including the "Magic-bullet" that made three 90degree turns (and stopped at least twice in flight to meet the time-line)

Utterly false. It was a fairly straight-line trajectory.

Lee Oswald, the reputed assassin, was seen six floors below the window where the fatal shot was reportedly fired about two minutes afterwards, calmly drinking a Coke-a-Cola

He was seen on the second floor (6 minus 2 is 4 to most people), not calmly drinking a coke. Repeated attempts have shown he had plenty of time to get there.

The list is endless, evidence was ignored, proper police procedure was neglected at all levels, forensic evidence was either never gathered, lost, stolen, corrupted, or dismissed.

No specifics offered. I guess it's just a rumor he heard.

Add to that the seeming propensity of witnesses to drop dead of heart attacks, one vehicle crashes, and other less than common causes.

False. A long-ago debunked contention.

All the evidence is sealed...

No, it isn't.

, except for the stuff like JFK’s brain which was lost/stolen from the national archives in 1965\66

Which was taken by Robert Kennedy.

Even the eyewitnesses, the people who saw the shooting, the doctors who attempted to save the president, the people who put the body in the coffin, the people who unloaded it at Walter Reed Hospital and assisted with the autopsy, all agree that the governments’ story (or at least significant parts thereof) is bullshit and most Americans agree.

False. They do not all say that. There are some with stories that don't match, but they don't all match each other either. Like witnesses in any case, they report various and conflicting things somtimes.

Oh sure, people bitch and write books and call for the government to release the information it has and conduct a full and complete investigation.

Which the government has done.

Well, I could go on trying to be funny about it...

That's one word for it.

9 posted on 11/24/2003 8:44:20 PM PST by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stultis
VERY good analysis. Exactly.
10 posted on 11/24/2003 8:57:53 PM PST by ChadsDad (I wish I was as good as you guys!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: mlo
". . . evidence was ignored, proper police procedure was neglected at all levels, forensic evidence was either never gathered, lost, stolen, corrupted, or dismissed."

I am not surprised forensic crime techniques were lacking in Dallas, TX forty years ago. Hindsight cringes at what went on. Shell casings picked up and pocketed without prior documentation. Imagine if that had happened with one of the recent sniper shootings!

But was it all a meticulous hoodwinking of the American public? Heck no.

11 posted on 11/24/2003 9:04:12 PM PST by Fester Chugabrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: donmeaker
Jack Ruby arrived in dallas after Oswald was supposed to be moved, not what you would expect if there was a professional hit. For some reason, the move was delayed, giving Ruby a chance to be there...if members of the national press corps are to be believed, always a big "if", Ruby was there all along - C-Span carried a discussion by several journalists who were on the scene in Dallas and one, Ike Pappas, ran into Ruby several times between the assassinations. The first night after JFK was shot he was in the police building looking for a telephone and this strange little man offered to help him, spoke briefly with some high official (I forget exactly who, maybe the sheriff himself) and then led Pappas to the official's own office to use his phone. The man's name, he later learned, was Jack Ruby. The following night Pappas was at a local radio station preparing his story to transmit back to New York when the same man - Ruby - showed up with sandwiches and cokes for those at the station "because I know you guys are working so hard" (Pappas said he felt so uneasy about the man that he didn't eat any of the sandwiches, although he took a coke because they were "sealed"). The next morning Ruby shot Oswald. He was slways apparently a hanger-on, ingratiating busybody looking to curry favor with the press, police, and any other public figures he could get close to - but they seemed to trust him and the results were fatal for Oswald....
12 posted on 11/24/2003 9:04:26 PM PST by Intolerant in NJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Jack Black
I've gone all the way around on this. I think Oswald did it. Lots of folks make those easy shots now just for the hell of it. The range was not far, 3 shots in 6 seconds is very doable.
13 posted on 11/24/2003 9:22:42 PM PST by Travis McGee (----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: donmeaker
Its action is pretty slick, with rounds in the magazine, but rattles and has a bolt stop when empty.

What does a "bolt stop" mean? Apparently (according to his wife) Oswlad spent many hours over a couple months "dry firing" the rifle. Could he do that without ammo? In any case that action must have been second nature to him.

14 posted on 11/24/2003 9:33:18 PM PST by Stultis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Jack Black
The article left out one big player in the whole sordid tale: the media. That's why the whole conspiracy was able to remain unreported upon.

More broadly: Johnson & Moyers. What a combo; and complete usurpation of the constitution in the LBJ administration. War on Poverty; welfare state; forced association in business and "public accomodation"; federalizing of local education; affirmative action; race riots; all of this immorality was the provocation for the "60's cultural revolution" and the further breakup from the center core of society. all the camoring for "results" now, no matter what, right now, that's all that counts. The short-sightedness of the generation and the aftermath. Thank you, Lyndon. I wish we had hardly knew ye.

15 posted on 11/24/2003 9:37:00 PM PST by ontos-on
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fester Chugabrew
I say Heck yes. Did you see the photo analysis of the photo of the grassy knoll showing the shooter--badge man-- and the railroad worker to his left; and then the young soldier [witness] off to the left of the picture?

it appears there was determined effort to sell a particular story. the order of the motorcade; slowing of same in front of the Dealey Plaza.

16 posted on 11/24/2003 9:46:16 PM PST by ontos-on
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Jack Black
Don't think it was a conspiracy. For all the players purportedly involved, the only people that didn't know what was happening was the general public and the Kennedy's. That folks, ain't a conspiracy. That's a plan.
17 posted on 11/24/2003 9:51:25 PM PST by Eastbound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ontos-on
The badge-man story is nonsense. It's a matter of seeing what one wants to see in a random pattern of dark and light splotches. Gordon Arnold, the guy supposedly with the army cap on, wasn't even there.
18 posted on 11/24/2003 9:56:03 PM PST by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Jack Black
People like Lyndon Johnson, J Edger Hoover, Gerald Ford, Allan Dulles, sure they are all dead now but we can still dig up the dirt right?

That's news to old Gerald. Well, he's always been brain dead.

19 posted on 11/24/2003 10:12:38 PM PST by Defiant (Give me liberty or give me.....prescription drug coverage?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack Black
Good rant BUMP
20 posted on 11/24/2003 10:25:07 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson