Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FOX News Channel's JFK: Case Not Closed
FOXnews ^ | Tuesday, October 28, 2003 | foxmarketwire.com

Posted on 11/15/2003 3:04:13 PM PST by Destro

JFK: Case Not Closed

Tuesday, October 28, 2003

On Sunday, Nov. 16, FOX News Channel will present a one-hour special commemorating the 40th anniversary of President Kennedy's assassination.

Join Greta Van Susteren for FOX News Channel's anniversary special — JFK: Case Not Closed .

One week after President John F. Kennedy (search) was assassinated, a nation-wide poll revealed that 62% of Americans believed a conspiracy was involved. And now, 40 years later? What do we believe?

A recent FOX News poll found that many Americans today do not believe Lee Harvey Oswald (search) was a lone gunman. And there may be some evidence to prove it...

President Kennedy's assassination may have turned Dealey Plaza (search) into the world's most famous crime scene, but in 1963 — crime scene investigation was not a sophisticated forensic science.

Cops made some surprising mistakes — mistakes that led to confusion for the investigators and fodder for conspiracy theorists.

Our special will examine the forensic evidence, the autopsy and the single bullet theory, including accounts from the people who were there.

You'll watch footage never before seen on TV and hear eyewitness testimony from people who've never spoken about it until now...

It's a one-hour special on American history that you don't want to miss... only on FOX News Channel.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: conspiracy; jfk
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-194 next last
To: Destro
There was no conspiracy. A little worm of a man named Lee Harvey Oswald killed our President and this country has never been the same.

That simple sad fact makes the whole thing much more depressing than any big conspiracy could. That one little worm of a man could do so much damage.

161 posted on 11/17/2003 7:14:58 AM PST by veronica ("I just realised I have a perfect part for you in "Terminator 4"....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mtbopfuyn
Blah, didn't make it clear above that it wasn't Oswald though I can see how people could think so.
162 posted on 11/17/2003 7:39:47 AM PST by mtbopfuyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: logician2u
I'd rather read Nellie's book.
163 posted on 11/17/2003 8:00:35 AM PST by mtbopfuyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe
Just for the record, I do NOT believe Johnson had anything to do with JFK's assassination. He was a tough old s.o.b. but I've never seen one iota of evidence that implicates him. But like O'Reilly always says, I could be wrong.
164 posted on 11/17/2003 9:56:18 AM PST by Bernard Marx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: Shooter 2.5; mtbopfuyn; Austin Willard Wright; Iwo Jima; Jhensy; GaryL
That computer angle bothers me since the bullet exited sort of mid-right up of the head rather than say through the front. Of course-factors like the head's position and the tendency for weak bullets to zip around also may explain it.

I think if there was a concpiracy - it was to use Oswald alone. Maybe

Posner did say there was a concpiracy-but it existed to cover up agency foul ups Posner says. What if it was to cover up teh fact that Oswald was linked to all those spooks? What if Oswald, being a small man-heard all this talk of killing off Kennedy by his spook handlers who used him for dirty work and decided Hey! I will make make myself a big man in their eyes by doing what they wish they could do? Oswald probably thought - they would rescue me in the end! After the killing I am sure the spooks paniced and covered up all links to Oswald-maybe even sending in Ruby to shut him up.

What I am saying is it is possible the Oswald was the lone gun nut-but this lone nut was a spook asset that probably was the first recorded case of (or covered up as the case may be) "blow-back". Osama Bin Laden was such a case of a spook asset going rogue, so it has happened before.

What do you all think? Remember Posner says there was a concpiracy-to cover up the agency foul ups but that is as far as he is willing to take it.

165 posted on 11/17/2003 10:33:51 AM PST by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorisim by visiting www.johnathangaltfilms.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: veronica
See my #165. There was a concpiracy according to Posner.
166 posted on 11/17/2003 10:39:56 AM PST by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorisim by visiting www.johnathangaltfilms.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: Destro
I never researched why he did it. It's hard enough convincing people that a killer wasn't in one of the trees.

And yes, there are people who claim there were two Oswalds, a killer in a tree, in the bushes, in the sewer system and standing in a car in the motorcade.
167 posted on 11/17/2003 11:10:17 AM PST by Shooter 2.5 (Don't punch holes in the lifeboat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: Destro
"Join Greta Van Susteren for FOX News Channel's anniversary special — JFK: Case Not Closed ."

Just one more step in the journey of FOX into the realm of tabloid news. Ratings appear to matter more than reporting.
Greta will probably have coverage of both Peterson & Bryant cases as well - let's all speculate!!! I am so sick of the pandering to the lowest common denominator by FOX - next they'll start having a page 3 babe every day - just like Rupert's rag in London.

168 posted on 11/17/2003 11:19:50 AM PST by familyofman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
About the flattened/pristine bullet:

It would take a lot less force to do what those photos show than would support the official story line about multiple entry & exits, multiple bones being hit, and then falling out on the gurney at Dallas General.

That's always been a foundation for 'conspiracy' theories.

Also: another poster commentd on people running toward the 'grassy knoll". Years after '63 I had a chance to listen to taped radio & TV reporting from the day of the shooting & confirmed everything I'd remembered. The grassy knoll was then about universally considered to be the source of fire...I wonder how many others posting today actually sat through the immediate assasination aftermath, and what their opinions on consporacy/lone loonie might be?
169 posted on 11/17/2003 12:49:51 PM PST by norton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: Destro
If JFK were a 42 yr old Senator running for the WH and adhering to his political positions from 1960, he would have to run as a Republican. That's how far to the left this country has shifted in 40 years.
170 posted on 11/17/2003 12:55:58 PM PST by wtc911
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: DesertWalker
The only explanation I ever heard was that she was trying to help SS Agent Lovelace(?) climb up. That's what they said then, I believe at least this part.
171 posted on 11/17/2003 1:01:58 PM PST by wtc911
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: mtbopfuyn; Destro
The old PBS, "The Men Who Killed Kennedy" and last night's History Channel shows are much better.

I'm going to have to watch that set of programs tonight on History at 8 ET, "The Men Who Killed Kennedy". Haven't seen this yet.

172 posted on 11/17/2003 1:10:25 PM PST by texasbluebell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: Iwo Jima
I THINK that supporters of the official version went into some detail as to how Kennedy had to be leaning forward when hit.
I also THINK that the commission simply didn't address the odd trajectories necessary to pull it off as they deemed to have happened.
Of course, in the film he is upright until the first hit and I THINK that he does not bend forward because of the brace.

All of which, like the rest of the debate, is based on thin air because the Kennedy family and a collection of "inept" doctors, police, SS agents, firepersons and the neighbor's cat managed to destroy/hide/contaminate/misplace the evidence.

And, to Laredo in post 138; LBJ was widely and often pointed to as most likely source behind any conspiracy.
Ol' Lyndon wasn't too popular with the democrat party after the end of "Camelot".

173 posted on 11/17/2003 1:14:31 PM PST by norton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: Shooter 2.5
If I am right, and mastoid is just about even with one's ear lobe (?) how does your comment fit with his grabbing his neck less than half that far below that point, and with his also being hit either in back or front of the head?

Also, if 5.5 inches below mastoid, where did it exit or stop?
174 posted on 11/17/2003 1:24:41 PM PST by norton (asking, not assailing; I've forgotten a lot of this)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: norton
In the film, Kennedy reacts with what the experts[!} say is the sound of the first shot.

The comment and scope alignment is for the second shot.

Frame 313 shows the third shot.

To answer your question, I'll let you figure it out. Look at the scope alignment with Kennedy and Connelly. Understand that the 161 grain jacketed bullet was traveling at 2000 feet a second.
175 posted on 11/17/2003 1:43:01 PM PST by Shooter 2.5 (Don't punch holes in the lifeboat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: norton

176 posted on 11/17/2003 1:45:29 PM PST by Shooter 2.5 (Don't punch holes in the lifeboat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: Jhensy
Always good to hear from former "conspiracy buffs." Good to know I'm not alone!

Did you see the "unfair" and "unbalanced" report on Fox last night? You would have thought Gerald Posner would have been invited on to at least give a defense for the single bullet thoery and give a rebuttal to Cyril Wecht. Especailly since they hyped the show as "Case Not Closed," a direct reference to Posner. I took notes on this show and I'm going to post an article myself rebutting this outrageously one-sided view of the assassination.
177 posted on 11/17/2003 3:52:28 PM PST by GaryL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: wtc911
No-that is how far left the Republican party has went where we are more like JFK. The Democrats went left but since they were already on the left side they went way left. The Republicans HATED JFK because he was too liberal.
178 posted on 11/17/2003 5:03:30 PM PST by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorisim by visiting www.johnathangaltfilms.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: Shooter 2.5; norton
that angle is soooo narrow!! How far away was the shooter to shoot so low? That is almost parallel.
179 posted on 11/17/2003 5:05:17 PM PST by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorisim by visiting www.johnathangaltfilms.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: GaryL; Jhensy
Posner admited their was a JFK concpiracy.
180 posted on 11/17/2003 5:06:38 PM PST by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorisim by visiting www.johnathangaltfilms.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-194 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson