Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

LIVE THREAD: SENATE FILIBUSTER!! Call Capitol Swtchbrd 1-800-648-3516 to Protest Dem Obstructionism
www.freerepublic.com | November 12, 2003

Posted on 11/12/2003 2:45:39 PM PST by Howlin

FILIBUSTER BEGINS AT 6:00 P.M. EST!!!!



TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Political Humor/Cartoons; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: constitutionlist; demnuts; dnc; filibuster; gop; hughhewitt; judicialnominees; marathon; scotuslist; senate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 6,621-6,6406,641-6,6606,661-6,680 ... 7,181-7,189 next last
To: Guillermo
You are absolutely wrong. There are recess appointments for federal judges. We've even had recess appointments for the Supreme Court, and Clinton recessed a judge to the 4th Circuit.
6,641 posted on 11/14/2003 7:25:41 AM PST by BCrago66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6632 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Did you see Lindsey Graham in a press conference saying that Hatch and Leahy have some "bad blood" from "way back" and that they should "take it somewhere else and settle it?"

No, I haven't seen any of the press conferences. Did you watch much of the "Graham and Coleman Show" last night? They were very good and repeated over and over that we have to fix this, that we have to find a way to continue. Unlike the hysterical dems, they were very reasoned and sounded sincere.

6,642 posted on 11/14/2003 7:25:45 AM PST by Dianna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6626 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Yeah I think so ......I remember DODD going on and on about the"4th vote on Fri."
6,643 posted on 11/14/2003 7:26:01 AM PST by OXENinFLA (Officers must assert themselves by example and by vioce. ----------- Patton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6638 | View Replies]

To: DDDDaytonNot
I am so not going to go there...
: )
6,644 posted on 11/14/2003 7:26:09 AM PST by DeuceTraveler ((wedgie free for all))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6625 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
I don't know
6,645 posted on 11/14/2003 7:26:24 AM PST by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6639 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Oh My!!
6,646 posted on 11/14/2003 7:26:24 AM PST by fml ( You can twist perception, reality won't budge. -RUSH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6634 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Oh My!!
6,647 posted on 11/14/2003 7:26:24 AM PST by fml ( You can twist perception, reality won't budge. -RUSH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6634 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
I don't get C-Span2, so I can't see what's going on. Are they voting for cloture on the other Judge now? Or was that last vote a twofer?

Qwinn
6,648 posted on 11/14/2003 7:26:45 AM PST by Qwinn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6640 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
You go girl!!!!!

I second that.

6,649 posted on 11/14/2003 7:27:20 AM PST by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6634 | View Replies]

To: Guillermo
Bookmark
6,650 posted on 11/14/2003 7:27:25 AM PST by Helen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6558 | View Replies]

To: Guillermo
I spoke with Specter office yesterday. There is a real jerk who answers his phone. I can not stand her. She is always yelling and irrational, anyway she told me that we did not want to block the filabuster becasue it is the REpublicians who called for it. That is all she had to say on the matter. Santorium's guy, who I love, said he thought Specter was supportive because AS is actually on the Judicial committee. Whatever that means? I guess I will ahve to llok up the votes to get to the bottom of it re: Specter
6,651 posted on 11/14/2003 7:27:25 AM PST by Diva Betsy Ross ((were it not for the brave, there would be no land of the free -))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6606 | View Replies]

To: deport
"They are taking cloture votes on the nominees at this time....."

Let me know again exactly what a cloture vote is. There are so many votes I get totally confused.

P.S. If this is a repeat posting it is because either my computer is screwed up or FreeRepublic is.

6,652 posted on 11/14/2003 7:27:36 AM PST by Spunky (This little tag just keeps following me where ever I go.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6512 | View Replies]

To: DeuceTraveler
If only I knew how you people link pics...

Go to the HTML Sandbox, it'll give you instructions on how. I'm a newbie at it myself; I've graduated to inserting smiley faces but I'm still working on pictures.


6,653 posted on 11/14/2003 7:27:45 AM PST by Not A Snowbird (One of Those Dreaded Federal Employees)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6569 | View Replies]

To: Guillermo
The "nuclear option" is a rule change, disallowing the filibuster of judicial appointments.

I take the "nuclear option" even more narrowly -- to be that rule cahnge, imposed via ruling from the Chair and Parliamentarian, based on a challenge by a signle Senator that the present rule is unconstitutional.

I think quite a few Senators would support a rule change in the context of a new Congressional Session.

6,654 posted on 11/14/2003 7:27:50 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6632 | View Replies]

To: nuffsenuff
I'm numb from dissappointment

What is the source of your disappointment? You could not possibly have thought that any Dem would switch side. The outcome of the vote was a foregone conclusion from the start.

6,655 posted on 11/14/2003 7:27:55 AM PST by San Jacinto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6608 | View Replies]

To: Spunky
Think of CLOTURE as ENDING DEBATE. That is it in a nutshell. Senators can debate forever unless 60 senators vote affirmative for CLOTURE.
6,656 posted on 11/14/2003 7:28:21 AM PST by PISANO
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6637 | View Replies]

To: Guillermo
Got it...

I all confused this morning...

I don't think a rule change is the way to go either, though.

Dems will use it to their advantage too.

I think the message that needs to be sent is that this was WRONG and the future democrat candidates for Senate should promise not to use this tactic again. The only hope is to use this politically. Screwing around with the rules is only going to make it worse, IMO.
6,657 posted on 11/14/2003 7:28:25 AM PST by nuffsenuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6632 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Here you go... here:

http://www.photovault.com/Link/Military/ExplosionsNuclear/MYEVolume01.html

and HERE:
http://www.photovault.com/Link/Military/ExplosionsNuclear/MYEVolume01/MYEV01P03_14.1698.jpg
6,658 posted on 11/14/2003 7:29:18 AM PST by DeuceTraveler ((wedgie free for all))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6620 | View Replies]

To: DeuceTraveler
pics link expl

http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a3aa5843c228c.htm
6,659 posted on 11/14/2003 7:29:49 AM PST by petercooper (Proud member of the VRWC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6569 | View Replies]

To: BCrago66
Byrd is one. He wants to assert his KKK priviledge if any more civil rights bills come up.

He still could. The change would not apply to legislative matters--just confirmations.

6,660 posted on 11/14/2003 7:30:09 AM PST by San Jacinto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6612 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 6,621-6,6406,641-6,6606,661-6,680 ... 7,181-7,189 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson