Skip to comments.
CNN Regrets Role In Planting US Dem Presidential Debate Question
AP via Dow Jones
| 11/11/03
| AP Staff
Posted on 11/11/2003 9:08:02 AM PST by BunnySlippers
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 next last
To: Timesink
Schadenfreude
2
posted on
11/11/2003 9:10:11 AM PST
by
martin_fierro
(_____oooo_(_°_¿_°_)_oooo_____)
To: BunnySlippers
CNN Regrets Role In Planting US Dem Pres Debate QuestionMy, my...caught trying to make news instead of reporting it. How liberally typical.
3
posted on
11/11/2003 9:11:03 AM PST
by
woofer
To: BunnySlippers
"CNN Regrets Role In Planting US Dem Presidential Debate Question"Say, I wonder if CNN Regrets Role in serving as an anti-American, "Liberal", Democrat Party propaganda machine???
4
posted on
11/11/2003 9:11:08 AM PST
by
Savage Beast
(Happiness is the best IQ test.)
To: BunnySlippers
a CNN producer ... clearly went too far," CNN clearly goes too far on any day ending in "y".
5
posted on
11/11/2003 9:11:18 AM PST
by
Drango
(A liberal's compassion is limited only by the size of someone else's wallet.)
To: martin_fierro
Is that German for "shot self in foot"? He-he-he...
6
posted on
11/11/2003 9:11:18 AM PST
by
talleyman
(Caviar emptor (a warning from the sturgeon general))
To: BunnySlippers
CNN manufacturing the news? I'm firmly disillusioned.
7
posted on
11/11/2003 9:11:46 AM PST
by
per loin
To: BunnySlippers
Trustman lived up to her name, and CNN lived up to its tradition.
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. Phonies.
8
posted on
11/11/2003 9:12:07 AM PST
by
Pharmboy
(Dems lie 'cause they have to...)
and told she couldn't ask her question "because it wasn't lighthearted enough and they wanted to modulate the event with various types of questions." I thought this was interesting ... Lighthearted? Why?
9
posted on
11/11/2003 9:13:08 AM PST
by
BunnySlippers
(Help Bring Colly-fornia Back!)
To: nutmeg
bump
10
posted on
11/11/2003 9:13:39 AM PST
by
nutmeg
("The DemocRATic party...has been hijacked by a confederacy of gangsters..." - Pat Caddell, 11/27/00)
To: BunnySlippers; Dog; MJY1288; Howlin
But when she arrived in Boston for the debate, Trustman wrote, "I was handed a note card with the Macs and PCs version of Clinton's boxers or briefs question" and told she couldn't ask her question "because it wasn't lighthearted enough and they wanted to modulate the event with various types of questions." CNN came up with that stupid question??
Figures
Wonder what other questions they had the students ask?
11
posted on
11/11/2003 9:14:04 AM PST
by
Mo1
To: BunnySlippers
Alexandra TrustmanWhat irony! This young lady needs to learn quickly not to trust the media, particularly when it comes to politics.
I'm not a bit surprised at CNN wanting to lob softballs at the 'rats .... it's their specialty.
12
posted on
11/11/2003 9:15:19 AM PST
by
kayak
(The Vast, Right-Wing Conspiracy is truly Vast! [JohnHuang2])
To: BunnySlippers
CNN regrets that it was caught planting questions.
To: BunnySlippers
CNN doesn't regret doing it. They regret getting caught. There is a difference.
14
posted on
11/11/2003 9:15:45 AM PST
by
Snowy
(Annoy a lib -> Work hard, earn money, and be happy!)
To: BunnySlippers
Yeah right. Just like CNN regrets covering up Saddams' human rights abuses in exchange for access to his spokesmen.
15
posted on
11/11/2003 9:16:06 AM PST
by
Recovering_Democrat
(I'm so glad to no longer be associated with the Party of Dependence on Government!)
To: talleyman
Good one!
Exact translation of "Schadenfreude" is difficult, but more-or-less, it means "taking pleasure in someone else's pain or suffering."
Generally it's not a good thing, but I do have some pleasure in CNN's being exposed for the Dem mouthpiece/propaganda organ it clearly is.
16
posted on
11/11/2003 9:16:31 AM PST
by
Prov3456
To: martin_fierro
SchadenfreudeAnd epicaricacy.
17
posted on
11/11/2003 9:17:09 AM PST
by
Consort
To: BunnySlippers
CNN: We Report, We Decide.
To: BunnySlippers
CNN Regrets Role In Planting US Dem Presidential Debate Questionno, cnn only regrets getting caught
19
posted on
11/11/2003 9:18:05 AM PST
by
InvisibleChurch
(Like sittin' on pins and needles, things fall apart, it's scientific.)
To: BunnySlippers
What a minute, we need to parse CNN's statements like we parsed the Clinton Admin's. So if CNN admits its producers staged a light-hearted question, it suggests that they also may have staged other questions. To avoid getting busted hard on that, they chose to reveal that they planted an innocent one. Story gets covered, and they move on, hoping that no one will dig deeper.
The real question is: Did CNN plant other questions, and has this producer done this before in other debates?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson