Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40 next last
To: nickcarraway
The NYT...More adventures in clowny town.
2 posted on
11/07/2003 1:45:31 PM PST by
metalboy
(Liberals-Nuke `em from orbit. It`s the only way to be sure.)
To: nickcarraway
To: nickcarraway
Ahh... The New York Slimes
All the smut that's fit to make up.
4 posted on
11/07/2003 1:46:44 PM PST by
WinOne4TheGipper
(Using Occam's Razor to shave the hairy beast of liberalism...)
To: martin_fierro; reformed_democrat; Loyalist; =Intervention=; PianoMan; GOPJ; Miss Marple; Tamsey; ...
This is the New York Times Schadenfreude Ping List. Freepmail me to be added or dropped.
5 posted on
11/07/2003 1:46:53 PM PST by
Timesink
To: nickcarraway
You would think they would be overjoyed and would publicize this immediately.
6 posted on
11/07/2003 1:47:15 PM PST by
petitfour
To: nickcarraway
Royal British buggery? You don't say!
To: nickcarraway
"savior of the world"
9 posted on
11/07/2003 1:48:24 PM PST by
evets
(Warning: graphic images.)
To: nickcarraway
To: nickcarraway
NYT NEWSROOM TURMOIL OVER PRINCE CHARLES GAY RUMOR
Fri Nov 07 2003 16:45:11 ET
Top editors at the NEW YORK TIMES panicked and ordered a story killed after London-based reporter Sarah Lyall filed a dispatch alleging rumors of Prince Charles and a sexual affair with one of his closest advisers!
The story appeared on the TIMES's internet website for 20 minutes -- before top editors ordered it immediately removed, the DRUDGE REPORT has learned.
"This should never have been published!" a top newsroom source explained Friday evening.
Lyall reported: "No one would say what the rumor was. Not the British newspapers, which were writing long, innuendo-laced articles about it. Not the television commentators, who were discussing it with acrobatic opacity. Especially not Prince Charles, who seemed to be hoping it would just go away...
"The allegation (although no one has said so publicly) has to do with purported sexual contact between Prince Charles, the heir to the throne, and Michael Fawcett, one of his closest advisers."
Developing...
12 posted on
11/07/2003 1:49:10 PM PST by
Timesink
To: nickcarraway
Was this the throne-shaking story the butler is supposed to be releasing? Good grief - British aristocrats have been buggering one another since Algore invented it in AD 100. I think it's kinda like a lodge initiation.
Well, I might have my history wrong there. It may have been earlier than that.
To: nickcarraway
And to think that instead of being King, he really wanted to be Queen.
15 posted on
11/07/2003 1:51:59 PM PST by
AxelPaulsenJr
(Proudly Not Reading The Headlines Since 1999)
To: nickcarraway
...or gay advisor.....
Hmmmm, what to do.....
16 posted on
11/07/2003 1:52:20 PM PST by
TrebleRebel
(If you're new to the internet, CLICK HERE.)
To: nickcarraway
Oh my, wondered if this was the case of the non story. Some are saying he watched as someone else was raped, but what I heard this morning made me think he was the culprit himself, hmmm!
19 posted on
11/07/2003 1:54:06 PM PST by
ladyinred
(Talk about a revolution, look at California!!! We dumped Davis!!!)
To: nickcarraway
To: nickcarraway
I wonder if Queen Elizabeth will provide the same "solution" to this problem as the king in Bravehart did...
31 posted on
11/07/2003 1:59:11 PM PST by
ambrose
To: nickcarraway
PRINCE CHARLES GAY RUMORWhy would anyone think that?
To: nickcarraway
Just this morning I was wishing for a diversion story for the media to pick up on. Kobe, Peterson and now Jessica are real old. I was wishing for something like a Hollywood liberal caught in a scandalous murder of their lover's spouse. Something to just let the mind take a break for awhile.
I got my wish when the Prince swished onto the scene.
How in the heck will they make this be the President's fault?
35 posted on
11/07/2003 2:00:36 PM PST by
Republican Red
(Karmic hugs welcomed!)
To: nickcarraway
Is he gay or just British? There's a subtle but important difference.
To: nickcarraway
Aack! What are they saying about me?
To: nickcarraway
This sort of thing has been around a long time. Edward I's son was reported to be gay and was dealt with rather summarily with a hot poker.
That said, if this is true, Charles will never be king. And if the boys turn out to be buggerers too, that's the end of the German monarchy.
48 posted on
11/07/2003 2:06:42 PM PST by
CatoRenasci
(Ceterum Censeo [Gallia][Germania][Arabia] Esse Delendam --- Select One or More as needed)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson