Posted on 11/03/2003 6:08:39 PM PST by sweetliberty
CLEARWATER, Fla. (AP) - Attorneys for the husband seeking to carry out what he says is his wife's end-of-life wishes said in court papers Monday her parents shouldn't be allowed to enter the constitutional fight over the new law which is prolonging her life. Attorneys for Michael Schiavo, whose wife Terri is at the center of the massive legal battle over whether she lives or dies, responded to legal filings seeking a judge's permission to allow Bob and Mary Schindler to become parties in the challenge of the new law.
The law allowed Gov. Jeb Bush last month to order Terri Schiavo's feeding tube - which has kept her alive for more than a decade - be reinserted six days after her husband ordered it removed.
Michael Schiavo's attorneys said that while the Schindlers arguably had a stake in the legal battle on whether their daughter's wishes should be carried out, the legal challenge of what's been dubbed "Terri's Law" is between her husband and the governor's attorneys.
"The rights at stake in this litigation are uniquely those of Mrs. Schiavo and it is those rights that are directly affected by the challenged legislation and Governor's actions," said the legal response filed in Florida circuit Court. "The Schindlers' interest in continuing to pursue their belief that the prior litigation was wrongly decided simply does not meet the requisite legal standard for intervention."
Doctors and a judge have ruled that Terri Schiavo is in a persistent vegetative state with no hope for recovery. She suffered severe brain damage in 1990 when her heart stopped beating - cutting off oxygen to her brain - because of a chemical imbalance.
The conservative law firm founded by religious broadcaster Pat Robertson asked last week to be allowed to intervene in the case on behalf of Schindlers. Circuit Court Judge W. Douglas Baird would have to grant permission for the Schindlers to enter the lawsuit.
The couple have said their daughter had no end-of-life wishes and believe she could be rehabilitated. They also dispute that she is in a vegetative state and believe she has enough mental abilities to respond to them.
The American Center for Law & Justice said in its filing that it believes lawmakers and the governor were within their authority to intervene in the case. Her parents are seeking to be appointed their daughter's guardians and to exclude them from the case would "violate their constitutional rights to be heart," the law firm said in its filing.
Yes, but the trial will be about the bill, and whether it was constitutionally enacted into law. It could have been named DAVE'S LAW and it wouldn't make any difference. It might not even make a difference if my hypothetical Dave had already died. The question is whether any law of this type is valid.
Doesn't this just BEG the questions....
What was the DATE that Michael and Felos connected up...and who initiated it....and did Michael remember that he wanted Terri dead, er, I mean that Terri wanted to die if incapacitated somehow, in relation to his assc with Felos?
Course it could never be proved that Felos talked Michael into making up this story...but hey....any man who goes for rehabilitation money and gets it after proving he is trying to rehabilitate her, THEN denys therapy AFTER winning the money for being such a good boy, and THEN remembers, YEARS later, that by gosh Terri did not WANT any rehabilitation or even to LIVE if she were to be incapacitated...is, well, FULL OF THE STENCH of trampling on Terri's RIGHT TO LIVE! And to LIVE COMFORTABLY as POSSIBLE!!!
Oh, but it's a "right to die" case, don't you know? Never mind that the victim isn't dying. Never mind that the victim has been struggling against every attempt on her life. Never mind that she has been permitted no therapy or environmental stimulation for the past 10 years. Never mind that she had no directives regarding starving her to death should she become disabled. Never mind that she committed no crime deserving of death. Never mind that we can't kill convicted killers or even animals in such a barbaric way. Never mind that the HINO has enough conflicts of interest to sink a battleship.
Right to die my @##! Just another step in the Nazification of Amerika!
What "facts" are referring to? The Schiavo's? The Schindler's?
Or the report from the court ordered independent physician that
concurred with the two of four physicians that initially gave Terri
a thorough examination? (The two dissenting physicians also
concurred that Terri will more than likely never recover, but
also gave some allowance of a possible chance of some type
of recovery.)
Which "facts" are you referring to?
Nope, didn't think so.
The judge is bound to follow the law as it is written, whether or not it is moral, although mandating the death penalty to anyone based on hearsay testimony from one who has a "clear and convincing" conflict of interest and "remembered" his wife's wishes years later is highly questionable.
Even if a person is truly in a persistent vegetative state, it should be illegal to starve them to death in all 50 states. That's the can of worms they seem to want to keep the lid on.
I consider it government ordered purgatory.
She is without a cerebral cortex; without it
she is incapable of any voluntary movement;
voluntary movement such as swallowing is
impossible for her, hence the absolute need
for the life supporting device. If it is removed,
her remaining body will die.
That life support system was inserted as a
temporary measure while testing was done to
give a sound prognosis. That was accomplished
and Terri was cited to have a permanent and
major loss of cerebral cortex; that area filled
with spinal fluid; her condition irreversible.
Once again:
Terri's soul is locked inside a useless shell and
keeping it there should be considered government
ordered purgatory.
Yeah, you're right. She really looks "dead" in those pictures...(according to Michael she was - or at least that's what he says NOW. Of course, back then, when he was still trying to get the money, he was claiming that the surgery she had was a success). These pictures are how she looked BEFORE Michael began to deny her therapy. And for your information, there have been doctors who have said that Terri CAN probably be rehabilitated to some degree. And even if she couldn't be rehabilitated, that doesn't give anybody the right to kill her. She is not brain dead. She swallows. She responds to her environment. No one is saying that she is brain dead....except Schiavo and his scum-sucking, bottom feeder lawyer, and we just know that their motivation is as pure as the driven snow. < /sarcasm >
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.