US calls Nato meeting on EU defence

Financial Tim es ^ | 10/16/2003 | Judy Dempsey in Brussels, FT

[Truth666]

When did the US call an emergency meeting last time ?

[Truth666]

When was the last time this happened ?

[aynrandfreak]

Wasn't it right after 9/11?

[ARCADIA]

It looks like the end of NATO is finally here.

[Stinkerbell]

Should we hit the showers???

[Truth666]

I don 't agree. In this FT article ONLY the title counts. The rest is crap.

[michaelt]

Depends on how series it is.

[RobFromGa]

US calls Nato meeting on EU defence
By Judy Dempsey in Brussels
Published: October 16 2003 18:20 | Last Updated: October 16 2003 18:20

The US has called an emergency Nato meeting to challenge the creation of a stronger security and defence policy for the European Union.

The call by Nicholas Burns, US ambassador to Nato, reflects growing unease among Pentagon officials over the way Britain wants to work more closely with its EU allies in building credible defence structures and better military capabilities. But it also highlights tensions in the transatlantic alliance, with the US seeing any future EU defence policy as a potential competitor to Nato.

The US move came as EU leaders met last night to discuss how to make European defence more effective in any new constitutional treaty. The draft treaty is being negotiated in the intergovernment conference that includes the 15 current member and 10 candidate states that join next year.

British, French and German officials on Thursday said it was too early to make any decisions over defence issues. "This is only the beginning. We need a more coherent defence policy that will complement Nato," said one British official.

Nevertheless, the Pentagon and the White House are particularly concerned over how Tony Blair, UK prime minister, wants to co-operate over defence with Germany and France, which opposed the US-led attack on Iraq.

"Somehow the US believes that because Britain is considered its staunchest ally, it cannot work with its EU allies," said one European ambassador. "This is ridiculous. If Blair is involved in Europe it means the transatlantic relationship is protected," he added.

Last month, Mr Blair held a summit in Berlin with French President Jacques Chirac and Gerhard Schröder of Germany. They agreed on "structured co-operation" in which a group of countries would take the lead in improving Europe's military capabilities.

France and Germany quietly dropped the idea of creating an independent military headquarters in Tervuren, near Brussels, something the US and Britain believed was a direct challenge to Nato. However, Mr Blair conceded that the EU did need operation planning headquarters if it was to carry out missions independent of Nato.

Mr Burns, a former US ambassador to Greece and State Department spokesman, lambasted such plans at Wednesday's regular meeting of Nato ambassadors. He said EU defence plans represented "one of the greatest dangers to the transatlantic relationship". He insisted Nato should know what kind of defence policies would be contained in the new treaty.

Benoit D'Aboville, French ambassador to Nato, told Mr Burns Nato had no business knowing about internal matters of the EU until they were agreed by its members.

An EU diplomat said the US believed France was setting a hidden agenda. "It believes Paris will use the trio to gradually strengthen the EU's military capabilities and eventually move away from Nato."

British officials, who on Thursday played down the US criticisms, said a Europe with better military capabilities and with Britain involved would lead to greater burden-sharing, especially in the Balkans.

[EggsAckley]

Why didn't you post the entire title?

[Truth666]

My guess is it is directly related to this : Russia thereatens NATO with pre-emptive strike

[Izzy Dunne]

Has France surrendered yet?

[Jumper]

This is pure Liberal Media Crap published merely to cast doubt upon the Presidency of G.W. Bush. I work at a NATO facility and dispell any rumor along the lines of a divorce. Europe may be proud, but it literally can't afford to go it alone... especially these days.

[Mad_Tom_Rackham]

Our message to the EU ought to be: "Defend yourselves, pissants!"

[Mad_Tom_Rackham]

Correction added:

"Defend yourselves, you ungrateful pissants!"

PS: "The next time we have to go there and save your asses, we're going to do it from 30,000 feet with nukes! No more American blood shed for the ungrateful European sophisticates."

[Tea42]

The next country to invade France should have to keep them. I weep for the American blood that purchased their thankless freedom twice in the past century.

[Michael81Dus]

Well, I guess that the French just haven´t understood that they were losers of both World Wars, and not the winners. Perhaps it was a fault to make them feeling important after the wars (Versailles Treaty 1920 and occupation zone 1945)... They think they can be THE European power (with the German Schröder-government at their side).

[kahoutek]

Mar 15, 12:49 PM EST

EU Calls Emergency Meetings on Terrorism

By CONSTANT BRAND
Associated Press Writer

BRUSSELS, Belgium (AP) -- The European Union will hold high-level security talks on Friday to assess what additional anti-terrorism measures to take in the wake of the bombings in Madrid, the Irish prime minister announced Monday.

Prime Minister Bertie Ahern said proposals would include a "solidarity clause" committing nations to help each other in response to terror attacks, the appointment of a special EU official to coordinate counterterrorism operations in Europe, improved intelligence sharing and closer cooperation with non-EU nations to combat terrorism at a global level.

"The callous and cowardly attacks on 11 March served as a terrible reminder of the threat posed by terrorism to our society," Ahern said in a statement.

"We condemn utterly those who planted the bombs that wrought such destruction and cost so many lives last Thursday.

"The attacks in Madrid were an attack against the very values on which the Union is founded."

Ireland currently holds the EU's rotating presidency.

EU justice and interior ministers will discuss the proposals Friday.

The EU foreign ministers will continue the debate the following Monday, before the packages goes to an EU summit, scheduled for March 25-26. All the meetings will be at EU headquarters in Brussels.

Copyright 2004 Associated Press. All rights reserved.

[kahoutek]

"assess what additional anti-terrorism measures to take"

Bulletin to the EU: The U.S has a plan.........