I agree with you. You are right. At the same time, Flowers is a disaster, or a plant. She may even be a mole, but that doesn’t matter. Trump has made bad decisions (a few) and this is one of them, if it’s his. The voters who matter don’t care - everyone who cares about her on our side has already decided. It is lunacy for (Fox, etc.) to give her attention. She makes Trump weaker. If she gets attention now, and he loses, she will have helped him lose. We all have old lovers and Bill Clinton is a god to 99% of the millenials. She’ll make Trump look weak - and SHE IS A MESS. Do you understand? Anyway - FR has long been a bastion of sanity, let’s not lose it.
The left is in a panic about Flowers going to the debate. That’s all you need to know.
To say Gennifer Flowers “makes Trump weaker” is about the emptiest argument I’ve ever heard.
Smells like desperation.
I was in agreement with you until someone pointed out that having Gennifer Flowers there has nothing to do with the voters. The whole purpose is to get inside Hillary Clinton’s head and maybe get her to fly off the rails.
Damn, I had to look. You have been a long time Freeper. You are questioning daddy’s judgment as Milo would say. I think you are a tipple to far. ;-)
Like you know what the hell you are talking about, when was the last time you were elected to anything or even considered relevant by anyone, other then your mom?
Polls indicate that millennials have no conscious memory of Slick Willy and are appropriately shocked by his and the Medusa's treatment of his victims. When informed of the details, they react angrily against Team Clinton.
Slick Willie FORCIBLY and VIOLENTLY RAPED Juanita Broaderick. Is she just one of his "old lovers?" How about Paula Jones whom he physically FORCED to perform oral sex upon him when she was a state employee and he was governor? Did he pay her millions just because she was an "ex-lover?"