Posted on 09/02/2016 8:44:53 PM PDT by KMG365
Chris Wallace chosen as debate moderator
The last one.
These moderators were selected by a bipartisan committee. I don’t know the names of the “Republicans” but I guarantee they are all from the Bolshevik wing of the Republican Party. Chris Wallik is a very sophisticated leftist. He will be cunning in his anti-Trump bias. None of this matters. Donald Trump will eviscerate Hillary Clinton and her media cronies.
Agreed. They are all terrible.
I read that Hillary’s plan is to pick at Trump’s personal issues, IE small hands type stuff in hopes of setting him off.
He can still own the debates, he’s powerful enough.
Three anti Trump leftist moderators.
Hillary will get the questions well in advance and will be prepared with focus group tested responses. Trump will go in blind.
The questions, particularly the foreign affairs questions will ask about details the average perso and even seasoned politicians wouldn’t know. The prepared and scripted Hillary will have the answers cold, looking confident and presidential. The attempt will be to make Trump look like an idiot grasping at straw. There is almost no way he can avoid making a factual mistake in this format.
After the debate the networks will trot out he anti Trump Republicans for the post debate analysis to show bipartisan expert opinion that Trump is a dangerous ignoramis.
There is no way any of these moderators are going to pash Clinton on Benghazi, emails, trade, healthcare, open borders, or any other issue of substance. They know to trip up Hillary would be a career ending move.
As i understand it - there won’t be one... it’ll be back to back sessions with a questioner. They won’t be on the stage at the same time.
..............................................
That is for the “Whatever you want to call it” this coming week. The “Debates” don’t start until the end of the month.
Why did Priebus, et al., agree to this lineup? I thought he was coming around.
Oh goodie he’s the conservative? Faux News sux
She should have been at least ran out of the country.
Matt Lauer’s clintoon connection
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3465628/posts
Matt Lauer’s clintoon connection
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3465628/posts
I listened to him yesterday.
He’s been told that he gets to choose the 6 categories, he gets to choose the topics, and he gets to choose the questions, and he gets to do the followups to get the candidates arguing with one another.
That is a stunning admission of a totally incompetent debate commission, because it applies to all the debates.
He is not a ‘moderator’. He is a participant.
“Mr. Trump, the outgoing under-secretary of postal enforcement in Swamiikistan has announced his opposition to the Bush “Stan’ Doctrine. How would you respond to him?”
“Mr. Trump, the outgoing under-secretary of postal enforcement in Swamiikistan has announced his opposition to the Bush “Stan’ Doctrine. How would you respond to him?”
“Chris: I would respond to him exactly as I respond to you: you are a total moron, fit only to read the news written by others from a teleprompter. Your attempts at dialogue with guests on your show is just like your dialogue with me and Mrs. Clinton tonight - designed only to highlight your liberal views. Now shut up and listen as I explain to you what I will do to make America Great again.”
Mrs Clinton will know and will have met the undersecretary of postal enforcement from swamiikistan.
The mass media will trumpet the next day “Trump Does Not Know Important Foreign Leaders and Issues!”
Count on it.
Thanks.
Considering the Art of the Deal, I expected Hannity to be one of the moderators.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.