Party of the Imbeciles clinton/cruz 2016
Posted on 07/22/2016 6:45:19 AM PDT by The_Republic_Of_Maine
by: Jim Buzzell
My number one political goal this year is to get Donald J Trump elected President of the United States of America. Once that is done my next number one goal is to take care of this illegal alien posing as a US citizen:
Why has no one in the national media, national conservative talk show hosts or anyone else investigated, probed or asked questions about Rafael Edward (Ted) Cruz’s birth right?
1 RAFAEL EDWARD (TED) CRUZ: Was born in Calgary, Alberta, Canada in 1970.
2 Is Rafael Cruz a Natural Born Citizen of the United States of America?
3 Is Rafael Cruz a US citizen?
4 You decide:
a. Rafael’s father had dual citizenship, as a Canadian/Cuban citizen at the time of Rafael’s birth, which made Rafael a Canadian/Cuban citizen?
b. Rafael’s mother was, maybe, an American citizen, would that make him a US citizen?
c. Rafael was born in Canada did that make him a Canadian citizen at birth?
d. Would Rafael Cruz’s birth in Canada make him a dual citizen of Canada and Cuba?
e. If Rafael’s mother was a US citizen at the time of his birth she had a duty to her son, if she wanted him to be a US citizen, to do the following: 1) Register Rafael’s birth with the US Embassy or Consulate on a Consular Report of Birth Abroad (CRBA) 2) Once the CRBA was approved the US State Department would issue form FS-240 establishing Rafael’s US citizenship.
f. Was this process ever completed for Rafael?
g. Can Rafael produce a CRBA issued in his name and the form FS-240 issued by the US State Department?
h. Can Rafael produce the CRBA or FS-240 with the US State Department signature, date and time stamped?
i. We know that Rafael does not have US birth certificate.
j. We know Rafael does have a Canadian birth certificate.
k. So the next question is, how did Rafael enter the United States from Canada? l. Was Rafael listed on his father’s or mother’s Passport?
m. What passports did Rafael’s parents travel on between the US and Canada?
n. Did Rafael travel on his own Passport or Visa, if so what was the origin of the documents?
o. When Rafael turned 18 years of age did he register with Selective Service?
p. If Rafael registered with Selective Service what identification did he use to establish his citizenship and does he have a draft card?
q. Did Rafael ever have a Green Card issued by the United States?
r. Was Rafael ever naturalized through the US Immigration process?
s. Since Rafael renounced his Canadian citizenship in 2014, and given the fact he probably is not a US citizen he would be a Cuban citizen living in the United States America as an illegal alien?
t. Why is Rafael using Ted as his first name?
u. Why does he never refer to himself as Rafael?
v. Is Rafael trying to hide his true identity?
w. Is Rafael trying to hiding through the use of an alias?
x. Do people who are hiding use fake names?
y. Is Rafael a fake person?
z. People who use aliases are usually hiding something, what is Rafael hiding?
aa. What is Rafael trying to hide? In my opinion, Rafael "Ted" Cruz talks about being a constitutional conservative, and espouses constitutional values, but only when it does not apply to him. Jim Buzzell.
The senior Cruz and his wife were mathematicians involved in the seismic tests used in petroleum exploration.
“First, Ted is not a conservative, but a self serving globalist minion, who learned to speak fluent conservatese.”
....learned to speak fluent conservatese. :-) Exactly right!
The Constitution does not reference or quote or site ANY person. You INFER that Vattel is present in Article 1 Section 8.
.........................................................
Well well well, you are at it again!
I ASSUMED you could UNDERSTAND that since E. Vattel, THE Internationally Recognized AUTHORITY on International Law at the time, was the AUTHOR of the Law of Nations, you were capable of understanding that citing Vattel was the same as citing the Law of Nations.
Since you obviously do not make the connection, I shall cite for you from the Constitution the EXACT REFERENCE to The LAW OF NATIONS from Article 1, Section 8.
“To define and punish Piracies and Felonies committed on the high Seas, and Offensies against the Law of Nations;”
Your insistence that the “Constitution does not reference or quote or cite ANY person” is unfounded.
I AM NATURAL BORN as I was born of two citizen parents and born on American soil. So you contention that “NO ONE COULD EVER BE NATURAL BORN “ is utterly ridiculous.
IF and WHEN you have slithered out of your pretentiousness and educated yourself, you may discuss this matter. Until then, please cease and desist from spreading FALSEHOODS!
No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.
***********************************
The part after the first comma exempted themselves.
They knew it would be a while before natural born citizens were possible.
Once again you are incorrect and since this is ground that we have already covered it is not worth the additional electrons.
Certainly not worth it. I am correct and will remain so as long as the Constitution is not shredded. Live with it!
“No, I don’t think he’s eligible, based on my opinion and limited knowledge of case law...”
Thanks for the straight answer.
As to case law, or judicial renderings (which I think is a more accurate description), I’m hesitant to base my own understanding of the clear language of our Constitution on the interpretations of black robed elites, whose judgments have the power to render that document inert, or even to invent original intent from thin air.
The language of the Framers may have been flowery, and even sounds a bit stilted to we descendants, but it’s not so far removed from our current usage of English, as to make its meaning impenetrable.
The phrase, ‘natural born citizen’ could only have meant, ‘one whose condition of birth precludes their being anything other than a citizen of their country of birth.’
The word ‘natural’ is the key to understanding original intent in this instance. Note also the word, ‘naturalized’. A person who is not born naturally to this country (or any other) must be made ‘natural’ by artificial means of the state in order to be a citizen.
Alright. Enough blather from me. If you want, seek out Freeper sourcery’s excellent treatise on the subject. It’s the best I’ve ever read.
That and a dollar will get Ted Cruz a cup of coffee.
Ted Cruz can be as eligible as he wants, but he will never be elected President of the US. You don't dishonor a pledge like Cruz did, and then piss in the punch at the National Convention, with Hillary using your words the next day.
That's aiding and abetting the Enemy.
Benedict Cruz's career as a Presidential candidate is finished. There will be no comeback for this unlikable person.
Richard Nixon and Ronald Reagan were much more likeable, comparatively.
Vote Trump!
So,of course with that being the case,he then promptly sealed his records. Makes perfect sense./s
You don't have a problem having an illegal alien in the US Senate? I do.
your answer makes you part of the left.
I agree.
Cruzites are more like Jim Jones cool aid drinkers.
I reckon not.
But did you know the Apostle Paul was from Texas?
you, he said: “For I reckon that the sufferings of this present time are not worthy to be compared with the glory which shall be revealed in us.”
Only Texans and me say “I Reckon”.
Party of the Imbeciles clinton/cruz 2016
This video might help you in deciphering whether Cruz is a NBC ( he certainly is not)
http://powderedwigsociety.com/eligibility-of-cruz-and-rubio/
Thanks. I will.
Just to let you know, that video has been debunked and shown to have 8 serious errors in it’s logic. It is nothing more than an opinion piece that is not supported by the current laws of the US or by court rulings.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.