Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hillary Clinton's Meeting with the FBI Means She Will Soon Be Indicted and Plea Bargain Guilty
The Santa Monica Observer ^ | July 2, 2016 | David Ganezer

Posted on 07/02/2016 8:37:37 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

Clinton was reportedly 'Cooperative" today as 3 FBI Agents grilled her for 3 hours.

Presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton met agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigations on Saturday. When investigators meet with the "target defendant," it generally means their investigation is swiftly coming to a conclusion, legal experts say.

The investigators now know what the questions are, and depending on Mrs. Clinton's responses, will recommend to the Department of Justice whether or not charges are appropriate. In other words, they want to question the Defendant, while of course video-taping her, to see how she might look to a jury.

After her now infamous meeting with former President Bill Clinton at Sky Harbor tarmac on Thursday, Attorney General Loretta Lynch said that she would accept whatever the FBI agents working on the case decided. In other words, she'll file charges if the FBI wants to proceed, and not file charges if they advise her to instead just close the file. So it's OK that she met with the FBI target's husband--she's not the decision maker. And besides, no ethical rule forbids it.

So where do we go from here? Mrs. Clinton will probably have to appear in Federal Court and plead Not Guilty at an arraignment. At that time, her attorneys and Justice Dept. attorneys might discuss resolution of the matter. In fact, they may have already agreed to a plea arrangement, which may be put on the record the afternoon of the morning Clinton is arraigned.

The Justice Department's goal is to complete the investigation and make recommendations on whether charges should be filed before the two major party conventions take place toward the latter half of July, sources said....

(Excerpt) Read more at smobserved.com ...


TOPICS: Campaign News
KEYWORDS: clinton; clintongate; hillary
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last
To: 2ndDivisionVet

I believe she will not face charges, based on:

1 Obama’s public statements of her innocence — he wouldn’t go out on a limb for her, and he IS in charge of the Executive;

2 Obama’s State Dept asking for a 27-month delay in releasing more Clinton email, which kicks the issue so far down the road, it might as well be never.


61 posted on 07/03/2016 4:06:18 AM PDT by Buttons12 ( It Can't Happen Here -- Sinclair Lewis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rockrr

“...FBI will report ... evidence of hellery’s espionage...”

I hope so but only if they are prepared to expose Obama’s participation/knowledge which is unlikely.

I am praying you are right!


62 posted on 07/03/2016 4:08:38 AM PDT by stonehouse01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: wastoute

“...Zero is an accomplice...”

I have been saying this as well all along and on recent threads. Obama was in on all of it, perhaps including the slush fund, and e mailed her as well. That is why Hillary will not get indicted unless the FBI is very brave and willing to lose their pensions perhaps at the risk of their families to expose Obama as an accomplice and they may not have the guts.

This goes all the way to the top and that is why it is being covered up so successfully so far and the ‘rats may get away with it.


63 posted on 07/03/2016 4:13:27 AM PDT by stonehouse01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Ray76

If Bill and Loretta REALLY wanted to keep the meeting secret, why couldn’t they have just used a phone (cellphone or landline) to talk? No one would have seen anything.


64 posted on 07/03/2016 4:29:39 AM PDT by Em and Brets Mum ("Lips that speak knowledge are a rare jewel." - Proverbs 20:15)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: SERKIT
This is a textbook violation of the Public Records Act of 1950 and numerous CFRs and other laws and rules.

Which is why this entire "Investigation" is such a farce. The FBI has allowed the agency to become a laughing stock. Not just this BS with Clinton but the entire leadership team a State is guilty. Comey will have shown himself to be just one more partisan hack, if the joke proceeds much further without an indictment or at least a recommendation for one, just on what is publicly known at this time.

65 posted on 07/03/2016 4:35:43 AM PDT by WHBates
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: D-fendr
Here’s my guess, worth the same as anyone else’s: She won’t skate. That would risk a Saturday Night Massacre or Comey resignation. She won’t get indicted and tried. There will be a deal. Hillary will plead to something she can slough off. Underlings will be sacrificed. The Lynch/Bill meeting was to iron out the details.

Could be, but my guess is:

  1. Hillary gets indicted now
  2. She pleads to reduced charges of something like mishandling government email info
  3. "Justice" department returns to other business
  4. Obama immediately pardons her and Billy of any other charges (to heal the country don't you know) and Justice department/Obama just as quickly seals all documents in the investigation because of said classified documents
  5. She gets disbared (just like her Hubby), agrees to drop out of the race. The Rat's fight it out at the convention to come up with another canditate
  6. Conservatives are outraged, but mainstream press spends all summer attacking Trump and totally drops the Hillary conversation within a week.
  7. Only Fox and some internet news sites will beat the drum, and possibly cover FBI leaks the come out.(wild card here is if hacked documents come out from overseas)

Hillary and Bill (knowing they had to cut their losses) ride into the sunset, spending their foundation/off shore stashed money until the time they turn into dust.

66 posted on 07/03/2016 4:38:14 AM PDT by HalfFull ("The only thing new is the history you don't know.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: TheErnFormerlyKnownAsBig

She won't put it behind her. She'll play the victim card. She'll claim that terrible "right-wing conspiracy" was out to get her. She'll convince her sheople she was the target of a contrived witch hunt during an election year. And ... idiots will believe her.


67 posted on 07/03/2016 5:07:47 AM PDT by so_real ( "The Congress of the United States recommends and approves the Holy Bible for use in all schools.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
When investigators meet with the "target defendant," it generally means their investigation is swiftly coming to a conclusion, legal experts say.

That's typically the case, but this is not a typical case.

68 posted on 07/03/2016 5:31:19 AM PDT by Skepolitic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mark17

“Cooperative” means only that she responded without the need for a subpoena and did not assert 5th Amendment rights. That is all.


69 posted on 07/03/2016 5:38:01 AM PDT by Skepolitic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

We know that Obama knew about the server. Didn’t the FBI, NSA, CIA, Secret Service or Homeland know?

This was a huge security risk. If they didn’t know, shouldn’t they have and if they did, why didn’t they stop it?


70 posted on 07/03/2016 5:38:30 AM PDT by mom.mom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Em and Brets Mum

A phone call leaves a trail, a record, even if it’s not known what was discussed - just like the current situation. But it’s actually riskier, the phones may have been tapped.


71 posted on 07/03/2016 5:46:12 AM PDT by Ray76 (The evil effect of Obergefell is to deprive the people of rule of law & subject us to tyranny!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: stonehouse01

Perhaps Clinton is not the target of the investigation, Obama is.


72 posted on 07/03/2016 5:48:29 AM PDT by Ray76 (The evil effect of Obergefell is to deprive the people of rule of law & subject us to tyranny!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The news from yesterday that 1) she won’t be indicted and 2) she met with the FBI for three hours doesn’t add up.


73 posted on 07/03/2016 6:10:54 AM PDT by libertylover (The problem with Obama is not that his skin is too black, it's that his ideas are too RED.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sarah Barracuda

Lynch was Clinton’s puppet first.


74 posted on 07/03/2016 6:12:17 AM PDT by originalbuckeye ("In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." - George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Ray76

“...Clinton not target ... Obama”

This is a possibility but I believe that the corruption is so bad that it includes much of the FBI now and they wouldn’t touch Obama ever. It causes them to not indict Hillary because Obama is so implicated.

I hope and pray that I am totally wrong.


75 posted on 07/03/2016 6:14:19 AM PDT by stonehouse01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Regarless of the extent of the Investigation, the FBI has evidence of her guilt for several things she has already admitted. There was no “grilling” yesterday. It was a formality and a chance for Hillary to give explainations if she so desired. I doubt Hillary said a word. Her lawyers did the talking. Remember her lawyer had a flashdrive in his safe that contained classified material. This is all bargaining and pretense.


76 posted on 07/03/2016 6:22:47 AM PDT by DrDude (Does anyone have a set of balls anymore?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DrDude

The smell of corruption pervades the air...


77 posted on 07/03/2016 6:32:19 AM PDT by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Skepolitic
“Cooperative” means only that she responded without the need for a subpoena and did not assert 5th Amendment rights. That is all.

Maybe she responded with the standard "What difference at this point, does it make?" That is called Clinton speak, like it depends on what the meaning of is, is. We have to define every word with these clowns

78 posted on 07/03/2016 6:36:48 AM PDT by Mark17 (The love of God, how rich and pure, how measureless and strong. It shall forevermore endure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: SubMareener
It would appear that the Clinton investigation is in a state of quantum superposition: Hillary is both charged and exonerated at the same time. Only when the box is opened will we know which one. If they don’t open the box, then we will never know.

The thing is, that is the only explanation. Does quantum superposition allow for different on/off, yes/no, multiple possibilities across the separate bubbles in the percolating universe?

79 posted on 07/03/2016 6:46:27 AM PDT by Stentor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

“That IT guy was and is a loose cannon who committed horrible crimes that no one could possibly detect”


80 posted on 07/03/2016 6:52:17 AM PDT by Steven Tyler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson