Posted on 08/01/2015 5:00:40 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
Looking forward to these results, especially the consensus vote. Fox News criteria for its first debate seems, unfortunately, to bias strongly toward name recognition rather than broad appeal, and I think that hurdle undermines the meaningful policy discussions that these early events should foster. Put another way: If a candidate could get consensus support but cant get in the door of the debate, then is the debate really representative of the preferences of the Republican electorate?
Thanks for participating.
(POLL-AT-LINK)
I think it is rigged. First attempt to vote, it picked someone for me and cast the vote. And, there is NO WAY The Donald is as low on that list of results as they are saying. No way.
Site has become questionable since Malkin sold it to Townhall.
I voted thanks for posting this, it’s silly but why not do it?
I’m astonished at the support Trump is getting from people here and on FB. I really think he is bollixing this up for us. He did good with bringing attention to the illegal murderers and rapists, I give him credit for that, but I feel like he is just sucking up all the air and taking attention away from what is an admittedly over large but in general very good field of candidates.
... it picked someone for me and cast the vote.”
You may be correct - Christie was already checked on my form. I wouldn’t vote for him as toilet bowl cleaner!
I have also been receiving some rather harmless emails from various sources asking me to rate things of importance. At the very end, however, there is a request asking me if I want to contribute to Warren’s campaign. Devious!
LOL I voted and it says mittens for the lead! lol
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.