Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

It's Walker Plus Six Also-Rans In Iowa GOP Caucus, Quinnipiac Poll Finds; Christie In 15th Place
Quinnipiac University ^ | July 1, 2015

Posted on 07/01/2015 8:33:09 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker leads the pack in the Iowa Republican Caucus, but his support is shrinking among likely Republican Caucus participants, as six other contenders battle for second place, according to a Quinnipiac University poll released today. New Jersey Gov. Christopher Christie is in 15th place, with 1 percent.

Walker has 18 percent of likely GOP caucus participants, compared to 25 percent in a February 25 poll by the independent Quinnipiac (KWIN-uh-pe-ack) University and 21 percent in a May 6 survey.

Jostling for second place are Donald Trump and Ben Carson, at 10 percent each, U.S. Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky and U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas at 9 percent each, former Gov. Jeb Bush of Florida at 8 percent and U.S. Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida at 7 percent. Former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee has 5 percent. No other candidate is above 4 percent and 5 percent are undecided.

Trump and Bush top the "no way" list as 28 percent say they would definitely not support Trump and 24 percent say no to Bush. Christie is next on this negative list with 18 percent.

"Those who thought the Republican race in the Iowa caucuses might begin to clarify itself better think again," said Peter A. Brown, assistant director of the Quinnipiac University Poll. "As even more candidates toss their hats into the ring, the race has gotten even more muddled....

(Excerpt) Read more at quinnipiac.edu ...


TOPICS: Iowa; Campaign News; Parties; Polls
KEYWORDS: 2016polls; bush; scottwalker; tedcruz; trump
FULL TITLE: It's Walker Plus Six Also-Rans In Iowa GOP Caucus, Quinnipiac University Poll Finds; Christie In 15th Place In Field Of 16

So Cruz, Paul, Trump, Carson and Bush are tied for second place within the margin of error?

1 posted on 07/01/2015 8:33:09 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

My morning fishwrap says that Christie is the 14th declared candidate. How does he garner 15th place?


2 posted on 07/01/2015 8:45:02 AM PDT by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman

Walker is not declared.


3 posted on 07/01/2015 8:47:04 AM PDT by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman

Scott Walker has yet to declare.


4 posted on 07/01/2015 8:48:16 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (You can help: https://donate.tedcruz.org/c/FBTX0095/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Oh noes!

We have a nominee, folks!

18% clinches it for Walker.

The other 82% just don’t count!


5 posted on 07/01/2015 8:55:30 AM PDT by Uncle Miltie ( A system of g84overnment that makes the People subordinate to a committee of nine unelected lawyer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Miltie

Last time I checked, Iowa was only one of the 57 states...


6 posted on 07/01/2015 8:56:36 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (You can help: https://donate.tedcruz.org/c/FBTX0095/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

When someone gets up around 40% get back to me. It might actually mean something.


7 posted on 07/01/2015 8:57:37 AM PDT by RIghtwardHo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RIghtwardHo

The only Republican (non-incumbent) candidate who has broken 40% in the Iowa caucuses is GW Bush in 2000, and Ronald Reagan in ‘76. Reagan, however, still finished second to Gerald Ford.


8 posted on 07/01/2015 9:05:28 AM PDT by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Polls by pointy-headed professors prove propaganda propagates profusely.

Eyeball traps created by leftists to lead Conservatives into confusion and disarray.

Conservatives fail to disregard them at their peril.

9 posted on 07/01/2015 9:10:47 AM PDT by Col Freeper (FR: A smorgasbord of Conservative Mindfood - dig in and enjoy it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

walker 18
trump 10
Carson 10
Paul 9
Cruz 9
Bush 8
Rubio 7
Huckabee 5

Add up Walker/Trump/Carson/Cruz/Paul and you get 56% to 20% against the weak sister side of the party. So why is Bush getting all the hype as a front runner?


10 posted on 07/01/2015 9:47:55 AM PDT by DaxtonBrown (http://www.futurnamics.com/reid.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jjotto

OK. 35% then. ; )

Perhaps inarticulate, my point is there are just so many that it’s tough to ever say anyone actually “leads”.

Your point is well taken my friend.


11 posted on 07/01/2015 10:00:10 AM PDT by RIghtwardHo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: RIghtwardHo

Angst over Iowa is mostly useless also because the Iowa ‘winner’ gets no delegates for the trouble. In 2012, for example, ‘winner’ Rick Santorum would have gotten no votes from the Iowa delegation should the national convention outcome have not been predetermined. Ron Paul supporters controlled the Iowa RNC delegation, with some party regulars supporting Romney.


12 posted on 07/01/2015 10:08:57 AM PDT by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

It’s better to look at the favorable/unfavorable ratios, particularly among the Tea Party (which is the group who will supply most of the volunteer campaign activists). It’s Walker and Cruz out front.


13 posted on 07/01/2015 10:11:08 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (You don't notice it's a police state until the police come fokquote>r you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jjotto

Very good point. Obviously the angst over Iowa is that the ridiculous MSM will run with whoever wins as the “frontrunner” when, while winning doesn’t mean nothing, it doesn’t mean much.


14 posted on 07/01/2015 10:13:52 AM PDT by RIghtwardHo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625

Take myself as a small example. Shut-in, can barely walk, still I post Cruz articles and have raised a ton of money for him as a bundler. Multiply that by 10 million or so.


15 posted on 07/01/2015 10:20:17 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (You can help: https://donate.tedcruz.org/c/FBTX0095/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
In the poll, on question 2 ("Is there anybody you would definitely not support") Bush got the highest unfavorable rating (37% tea party, 24% overall). Walker got just a 1% unfavorable tea party rating (4% overall), Cruz 2% (9% overall)

Cruz's favorable rating is 80% among tea party (58% overall). Walker is 83%. These are the ones who will be left standing after the rest of the field has dropped out.

16 posted on 07/01/2015 10:48:56 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (You don't notice it's a police state until the police come fokquote>r you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: jjotto

Rules are going to be different in 2016. Delegates will be bound on the first ballot.


17 posted on 07/01/2015 11:47:29 AM PDT by iowamark (I must study politics and war that my sons may have liberty to study mathematics and philosophy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

But the caucuses still won’t award any national convention delegates.


18 posted on 07/01/2015 2:55:52 PM PDT by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: jjotto

The national delegates themselves will not be elected until the 2016 district/state convention. But those national delegates will be bound to vote (on the first) ballot according to the results of the precinct caucuses. This is, of course, a reaction to the situation in 2012 where Ron Paul finished third in the caucuses, but elected almost all of the national convention delegates.


19 posted on 07/01/2015 3:09:53 PM PDT by iowamark (I must study politics and war that my sons may have liberty to study mathematics and philosophy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

Thanks. Good to know.

I know there was such a change to the general RNC rules, but I was under the impression that the hard rules didn’t apply to Iowa.

I’ll have to call downtown again!


20 posted on 07/01/2015 3:36:32 PM PDT by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson