Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ted Cruz WON’T order a pot crackdown in states where it’s legal if he’s made president...
The London Daily Mail ^ | April 20, 2015 | Francesca Chambers in Nasua, New Hampshire

Posted on 04/20/2015 3:54:05 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

Ted Cruz is personally against the legalization of marijuana but the Republican presidential candidate said this weekend that he believes states have the right to put decriminalization laws on the books if they want - even though they directly conflict with federal law.

Cruz implied during a conversation with Daily Mail Online on Saturday that if he ascended to the highest elected office he wouldn't make his attorney general enforce federal laws pertaining to marijuana in states that have approved sales and consumption of the drug.

The position stands in contrast to the views of at least three of his GOP competitors, who last week said that while they believe in states' rights to self-determination, they'd lay the hammer down on Colorado and Washington for flouting federal law.

Asked Saturday during a New Hampshire campaign stop if he would direct his attorney general to enforce federal pot laws, Cruz said ‘yes’ before providing a lengthy answer that indicated he would not.

He first said that ‘if the attorney general and the president disagree with federal drug law they should come to Congress’ because Republicans and Democrats can come together on the issue of drug reforms....

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: New Hampshire; Campaign News; Issues; State and Local
KEYWORDS: cannabis; drugs; marijuana; paultardation; paultardnoisemachine; pot; randpaulnoisemachine; randsconcerntrolls; statesrights; tedcruz; tenthamendment; wod
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-127 next last
To: JRandomFreeper
Would you be in favor of putting tobacco on the same schedule as pot?
21 posted on 04/20/2015 4:31:10 PM PDT by jmacusa (Liberalism defined: When mom and dad go away for the weekend and the kids are in charge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: jmacusa

Not well. But it will not go well either by legalizing it immediately across the board. The war is ultimately to agree on behaviors that are most conducive to a free and prosperous people. I know “compromise” is a bad word in some circles, but this is truly an area where compromise can be attained.


22 posted on 04/20/2015 4:32:43 PM PDT by Fester Chugabrew (Even the compassion of the wicked is cruel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: jmacusa
Pot should not be on any kind of federal schedule. It is none of the business of the federal congress. Period.

/johnny

23 posted on 04/20/2015 4:35:32 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Why would he order a crackdown?

States Rights, right or wrong as long as they don’t violate the United States Constitution.

If someone happens to live in a Pothead State and they decide it isn’t their cup of Tea, either they work to repeal the Law or they move to another State.

Is it me, or is the Media frantically trying to trap Senator Cruz with all these silly gotcha questions and make believe scenarios?

Heck, most of the time they wont give his Campaign the time of day. The Media is as transparent as Mud.


24 posted on 04/20/2015 4:39:10 PM PDT by Kickass Conservative (Hillary, because it's time for a POTUS without a SCROTUS...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp

He’s doing it because he believes in the constitution and states rights. It’s a pretty easy position to understand. Don’t confuse it with pandering for votes.


25 posted on 04/20/2015 4:39:45 PM PDT by Render
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Fester Chugabrew

Alcohol Prohibition sure wasn’t ‘’conducive to a free and prosperous people’’ was it? So how is marijuana prohibition’’conducive to a free and prosperous people’’?


26 posted on 04/20/2015 4:42:40 PM PDT by jmacusa (Liberalism defined: When mom and dad go away for the weekend and the kids are in charge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: jmacusa

The proper use of either substance can be conducive to a free and prosperous people. I think we are a little too strict with both. At the same time, it would be a much more dangerous world if both were completely without restriction.


27 posted on 04/20/2015 4:47:49 PM PDT by Fester Chugabrew (Even the compassion of the wicked is cruel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Fester Chugabrew
Naturally. Drive drunk, lose your license, drive stoned same thing.
28 posted on 04/20/2015 4:50:01 PM PDT by jmacusa (Liberalism defined: When mom and dad go away for the weekend and the kids are in charge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: jmacusa

High taxes.


29 posted on 04/20/2015 4:50:47 PM PDT by lilypad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Sen. Cruz doesn't see the Supremacy Clause as an absolute, any more than the First Amendment. He sees the states and the federal government as "spheres of influence" where there should be a balancing of interests. In this instance, he would defer to this state whose people have spoken on this issue, despite the fact that he opposes legalization. In other states that have not so acted, he would enforce federal law. If Congress passed a law respecting the Colorado law, and he signed it, however, Sen. Cruz would enforce federal law.

That is my reading of the response from Sen. Cruz's staff.

30 posted on 04/20/2015 4:54:55 PM PDT by Praxeologue ( ')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Ted Cruz is 10th Amendment strong again. States Rights trump the Federal Government here again.

Besides Ted has far more important work to do within the Federal Government confines. Like abolishing or downsizing the EPA, IRS, DOE, FDA, etc etc etc.....


31 posted on 04/20/2015 4:57:05 PM PDT by eartick (Been to the line in the sand and liked it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lavaroise

Dead on.


32 posted on 04/20/2015 4:58:35 PM PDT by right way right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Render

Bingo! Ted Cruz is a Constitutionalist. That freaks out a lot of Republicans.


33 posted on 04/20/2015 5:00:47 PM PDT by TigersEye (STONE COLD ZOMBIE SCOURGE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
ya, so ?

10th ammendment

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people

34 posted on 04/20/2015 5:01:52 PM PDT by knarf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Render

yup ... my #34


35 posted on 04/20/2015 5:03:28 PM PDT by knarf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: jmacusa

I think we’re pretty much on the same page with this. There is always a tension between individual and corporate, privilege and responsibility. Much as I’d like to throw anyone and everyone out of the way who would prohibit my behaviors, in the long run it is better for me to compromise in applying some discipline to myself for the sake of, and in agreement with, others. In a perfect world we would all agree on how this discipline is to be spelled out and applied. How’s that perfect world workin’ out for ya?


36 posted on 04/20/2015 5:03:38 PM PDT by Fester Chugabrew (Even the compassion of the wicked is cruel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Ted, being a strict Constitutionalist, is leaving it up to the states. I see no problem.


37 posted on 04/20/2015 5:07:01 PM PDT by CatherineofAragon ("This is a Laztatorship. You don't like it, get a day's rations and get out of this office.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lavaroise; jmacusa
"How about just legalizing altogether and end this bs once and for all?"

nope, no way. A State or an individual has the right to discriminate against a pot smoker. Let us not turn the tables around like with the federalization of gay rights

Good point! It isn't like anyone is forcing you to tolerate pot smokers in your city or your state. You ARE being forced to tolerate homosexuals no matter what state you're in. You're being forced to submit to all kinds of regulation that way.

Government is a force. It's supposed to be a servant. Overuse makes it a master. State's rights reduces government to the servant it is supposed to be. It is the CONSERVATIVE approach to government.

There's no more call to prohibit pot than to prohibit its prohibition! Let states decide that. The Federal government has zero place.

Go Cruz.

38 posted on 04/20/2015 5:07:11 PM PDT by Finny (Thy word is a lamp unto my feet, and a light unto my path. -- Psalm 119:105)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Yeh somebody tell the Limey’s about states rights. Oh wait they don’t even have a Constitution.


39 posted on 04/20/2015 5:09:16 PM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose o f a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmacusa; 2ndDivisionVet; All
How about just legalizing altogether and end this bs once and for all?

What you really mean, is, How about the Federal government making it illegal for any state to outlaw pot, once and for all?

40 posted on 04/20/2015 5:09:39 PM PDT by Finny (Thy word is a lamp unto my feet, and a light unto my path. -- Psalm 119:105)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-127 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson