(hoping libtards see this)
(hoping libtards see this)
Randy is just like Milt Romley... he can say anything you want him to say, be anything you want him to be.
Bwhahahaha! You have to be a conservative first, before you can aspire to be the “most conservative”.
This is an object lesson on how mendacious the media is. They believe they can print any falsehood with impunity because no one will call them on it.
Despite all the rhetoric, Rand Paul IS NOT going to be the GOP nominee. Don’t forget, the seed doesn’t fall far from the tree.
NOTE TO BILL STRAUB: Rand Paul is not the most conservative, nor is he even in the top 10! Maybe you should ask the electorate what we mean by conservative.
Rand reminds me so much of Mitt Romney, he can “evolve” instantly and frequently.
CNN:
BLITZER: So, just to be precise, if you believe life begins at conception, which I suspect you do believe that, you would have no exceptions for rape, incest, the life of the mother, is that right?
PAUL: Well, I think that once again puts things in too small of a box. What I would say is that there are thousands of exceptions. You know, I’m a physician and every individual case is going to be different, and everything is going to be particular to that individual case and what’s going on with that mother and the medical circumstances of that mother.
I would say that after birth, you know, we’ve decided that when life begins, we have decided that we don’t have exceptions for one- day-old or six-month-olds. We don’t ask where they came from or how they came into being, but it is more complicated because the rest of it depends on the definition of when life comes in. So, I don’t think it’s a simple as checking box and saying exceptions or no exceptions.
And there are a lot of decisions that are made privately by families and their doctors that really won’t — the law won’t apply to, but I think it’s important that we not be flippant one way or the other and pigeon hole and say, oh, this person doesn’t believe in any sort of discussion between family. And so, I don’t know if there’s a simple way to put me in a category on any of that.
BLITZER: Well, it sounds like you believe in some exceptions.
PAUL: Well, there’s going to be, like I say, thousands of extraneous situations where the life of the mother is involved and other things that are involved.
So, I would say that each individual case would have to be addressed and even if there were eventually a change in the law, let’s say, the people came more to my way of thinking, it’s still be a lot of complicated things that the law may not ultimately be able to address in the early stages of pregnancy that would have to be part of what occurs between the physician and the woman and the family.
The left know he’s a wacko and this is their attempt to paint conservatives with the wacko brush.
I just realized what Graham could be doing in the race: acting as a ‘favorite son’ spoiler to the conservative frontrunner in SC.
NH, especially, favors the chosen RINO/GOPe candidate, and Iowa can fall for an Evangelist RINO/GOPe, such as Huck. SC is the best hope for a conservative, and if Graham can take that away that’s a significant blocking move to the advantage of the Establishment candidate.