Posted on 10/02/2014 8:08:05 AM PDT by GonzoII
What may have happened is this: Over the summer Democrats used their money advantage to savage Republican opponents. When spending got equalized in September, Republicans numbers rose.So Republicans retain big leads to pick up three open seats in states carried by Mitt Romney West Virginia, Montana and South Dakota. Republican nominees have moved ahead of three Democratic incumbents in Romney states (Alaska, Arkansas, and Louisiana) and in two target states carried by President Obama (Colorado and Iowa).
Only in North Carolina, which Romney narrowly carried, has the Republican not yet overtaken the incumbent Democrat Sen. Kay Hagan and her edge is narrowing in the most recent polls.
Psephologists used to have a rule that incumbents running below 50 percent against lesser known challengers would inevitably lose. Everyone knows them, the logic went, and half arent voting for them.
That rule doesnt seem to apply anymore, but perhaps another one does. The RealClearPolitics average of recent polls puts Democratic incumbents in these five states at 41 to 44 percent of the vote.
In seriously contested races in the last six Senate cycles, starting with 2002, only two incumbents polling at that level in September ended up winning. One was appointed to an open seat and thus probably not widely known. Both ended up with less than 50 percent and won by plurality.
Psephological rules are made to be broken, sooner or later. Polls can fluctuate. Events or campaigning can change attitudes. Democrats now trailing might win Republican seats in Kentucky or Georgia. Or the former Democrat running as an Independent in Kansas could win and cast the deciding vote for Democrats. There are ways they can hold their Senate majority. But most likely they wont.
That should settle the ongoing argument in psephological circles about whether this is a wave year. Some argued that since Republicans were expected to gain only a few seats in the House something the insiders pretty much agree on and since they were by no means certain of winning a Senate majority, it might not be a wave at all.
But it depends on what your benchmark is. In 2012 Republicans won 234 House seats the second most theyve won since 1946, just behind the 242 in 2010. Expecting them to gain anything like the 63 seats they did in 2010 or the 52 in 1994 was always unrealistic.
As for Senate elections, the Republicans entered this cycle down 55 to 45. Its noteworthy when well-informed analysts give a party a better than even chance of making a net gain of six Senate seats, as they have throughout this cycle. I cant remember consensus predictions of six-Senate-seat gains in 1974, 1980, 1994 or 2006 all now regarded as wave years.
All of which is to say that focusing too closely on fluctuations in the polls risks losing sight of the bigger picture. Rewind back five years: The Obama Democrats expected their major policies to be popular.
They expected that most voters would be grateful for the stimulus package, for Obamacare, for raising the tax rate on high earners. They arent.
Democrats expected that running for re-election theyd be running ads touting these genuine accomplishments. They arent. Instead you get personal attacks on Republican nominees and oldie-but-supposedly-goodie reprises of the war on women theme.
Out in Colorado about half of Democrat Mark Udalls TV spots have been on abortion. Even liberal commentators are questioning whether thats smart. But maybe the Udall consultants sitting around the table cant come up with anything better.
Early in the 2010 cycle, Barack Obama told an Arkansas House Democrat that he neednt worry about voters because youve got me. Today all four Arkansas House seats are held by Republicans. Democratic Senate candidates in multiple states have been shunning Obama campaign appearances.
Were watching a wave come in. We just cant be sure how far it goes.
And Romney will win 330 EVs on Election Day, right Mike?
The longer Obozo delays issuing a border closing for travel to and from Africa, the larger the GOP win will be assuming they begin calling for it NOW.
I think the wave will be shockingly large...
Please, God, let it be a TSUNAMI!
Imagine how big the wave would be if Romney and Rove
were not there, and in their absence: CONSERVATISM.
So, I guess Rove is wrong again about GOP-e candidates needing money.
Be still, my beating heart.
But Obama will still not be impeached, Boehner will still be a bonehead.
I’m betting that the GOPe is actually more afraid of this wave than the democRats are.
They’ll actually be expected to DO SOMETHING to oppose Obama.
If Obama persists in allowing Ebola patients to transit the country it may be a much bigger wave than any of us can imagine.
Could be the same this go around...but there is no doubt Obama fatigue out there.
Yes, his credibility did take a bit of a hit in ‘12, didn’t it?
We need 67. We need 67. We need 67. Not betting on it.
Imagine how big the wave would be if conservatives weren’t voting for Democrats and phony independents or sitting in a corner pouting.
If the GOP can pull it off, let’s hope that they act like winners and not butt boys for the RATS.
In fact, when not protecting Democrats,
Romney attacks Conservatives for Democrats.
Boehner attacks Conservatives for Democrats.
Rove attacks Conservatives for Democrats.
lol OK. Let me guess. This is like the unskewed polls?
There will be no wave. The GOPe may do reasonably well IF all falls into place. But like I’ve said, the fact that this is even up in the air is a disaster due to the incredibly positive electoral map for the GOP.
Yeah in year out it’s happy talk and it never seems to work out and we do it all again. As long as we think that way, it will never change. We have ideas, not wishful thinking. Too often we rely upon the latter.
And stop any SCOTUS picks from Obama!! The Country has to survive two more years and then.....
They have been so since 1937.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.