Since Feb 6, 2008
Yeah yeah yeah, I want Obama, Hillary, the destruction of the United States (too late it's already done), yada yada yada. I can and will say when it's all over with that I had nothing whatsoever to do with whoever is in charge. I'm going to vote for a conservative for President. Whether the Ratlight party wants to give me one to vote for or not. This is America and I can do that.
Give me a candidate I can vote for. No more holding my nose.
Have fun
Hear Hear !!
I will not cast my precious vote for any of the three Democrat Socialists running.
You know, if the Libertarian Party wants to become a major political player in this country, here is their chance.
Right now, you have a LOT of marginalized, disaffected conservatives out there. While one could make the case that “Well, Bob Barr might splinter the right the way Perot did in ‘92”, and I can certainly envision that, this is still a golden opportunity for them.
If the Libertarians want to be known as something more substantial than a “pot should be legal” party and make some actual geniune noise, now is the time.
"Screw you guys! I'm stayin home!"Okay.
Some people are just stuck on stupid. If you have two $hit sandwiches (Hillary/Obama) or a douchebag (McCain) vote for the douchebag or be ready to eat poo for 4 to 8 years.
This is the perfect representation of John McLame's campaign for President if he insists on hollering like Algore about CO2 and planting his dopey @$$ in front of windmill pictures. Down in flames again Johnny Boy.
This is so odd. Harry Reid was on Hannity & Colmes tonight saying McCain had swung hard to the right in the last seven years. Who to believe?
Join the club. See my tagline
This article pretty well sums it up. I will be joining Farah this time.
It will be those that accept McCain as a candidate who will be electing Obama.
His name is Jonathan Chait, a senior editor at The New Republic. Here's what he wrote in that magazine:
That would be the Jonathan Chait who wrote "The Case for Bush Hatred" in 2003.
Sure, not like he has an agenda or anything ...
It is no exaggeration to say that, during this crucial period, McCain was the most effective advocate of the Democratic agenda in Washington.
I guess it's "not an exaggeration" if it's flat-out wrong ...
On the environment, he sponsored with John Kerry a bill raising automobile fuel-efficiency standards ...
And that's wrong because ...? ... (aside from the company McCain keeps, I mean) ...
This is a bizarre situation. Chait, a liberal, hates Bush (he admits it: he revels in it), so he uses Bush to make McCain look like a Democrat (which he isn't). Farah, a conservative, isn't so much in love with Bush, but he swallows Chait's line on every point, without question and ends up rejecting McCain. Maybe Jon and Joe deserve each other.
More and more are in agreement with us about not voting for McCain.
I actually hope he loses, and I do not think we are doomed I tell you doomed if he loses.
Any of the three will damage the economy but nothing that can’t be fixed.
Sooooooo, not only will I not vote for McCain I may vote the 3rd party. I have never voted this way before, I am 57.
Screw McCain and all of the other socialist RINO’s.