To: Just another Joe
You've already admitted that argument doesn't hold water. Trying to get the subject changed?The argument that all employees should have the same health laws apply is the one I agree with. Either a smoking ban in the work place should apply to all employees or no employees.
Its inconsistant to apply them to one group and not the other.
193 posted on
06/04/2003 10:35:12 AM PDT by
VRWC_minion
(Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and most are right)
To: VRWC_minion
The argument that all employees should have the same health laws apply is the one I agree with. Either a smoking ban in the work place should apply to all employees or no employees.Still trying to change the subject.
The argument that you have already conceded is the one about whether SHS (ETS) is harmful.
200 posted on
06/04/2003 10:40:01 AM PDT by
Just another Joe
(FReeping can be addictive and helpful to your mental health)
To: VRWC_minion
Either a smoking ban in the work place should apply to all employees or no employees.The smoking bans are based on the false assumption that second-hand smoke is harmful.
Universally imposing bans based on junk science and political agendas is an affront to freedom, explaining your smug delight in their spread, lady.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson