Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Passive Smoking Doesn't Cause Cancer - Official
13 November 2002

Posted on 11/13/2002 9:23:09 AM PST by SheLion

UK Sunday Telegraph...
Passive Smoking Doesn't Cause Cancer - Official


Headline: Passive Smoking Doesn't Cause Cancer - Official
Byline: Victoria MacDonald, Health Correspondent
Dateline: March 8, 1998

The world's leading health organization has withheld from publication a study which shows that not only might there be no link between passive smoking and lung cancer but that it could even have a protective effect. The astounding results are set to throw wide open the debate on passive smoking health risks.

The World Health Organization, which commissioned the 12-centre, seven-country European study has failed to make the findings public, and has instead produced only a summary of the results in an internal report. Despite repeated approaches, nobody at the WHO headquarters in Geneva would comment on the findings last week.
-------
The findings are certain to be an embarrassment to the WHO, which has spent years and vast sums on anti-smoking and anti-tobacco campaigns. The study is one of the largest ever to look at the link between passive smoking - inhaling other people's smoke - and lung cancer, and had been eagerly awaited by medical experts and campaigning groups. Yet the scientists have found that there was no statistical evidence that passive smoking caused lung cancer.

-------

The research compared 650 lung cancer patients with 1,542 healthy people. It looked at people who were married to smokers, worked with smokers, both worked and were married to smokers, and those who grew up with smokers. The results are consistent with there being no additional risk for a person living or working with a smoker and could be consistent with passive smoke having a protective effect against lung cancer.

The summary, seen by The Sunday Telegraph, also states: "There was no association between lung cancer risk and ETS exposure during childhood." A spokesman for Action on Smoking and Health said the findings "seem rather surprising given the evidence from other major reviews on the subject which have shown a clear association between passive smoking and a number of diseases."
-------

Dr Chris Proctor, head of science for BAT Industries, the tobacco group, said the findings had to be taken seriously. "If this study cannot find any statistically valid risk you have to ask if there can be any risk at all. "It confirms what we and many other scientists have long believed, that while smoking in public may be annoying to some non-smokers, the science does not show that being around a smoker is a lung-cancer risk."


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government
KEYWORDS: antismokers; butts; cigarettes; individualliberty; makenicotineschd1; michaeldobbs; niconazis; prohibitionists; pufflist; smokingbans; taxes; tobacco
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 581-584 next last
Another grand study that is kept under the rug!  The truth is IN here.  We just have to dig for it.  The anti's sure do not want us to see this one, either, I bet!
1 posted on 11/13/2002 9:23:09 AM PST by SheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: *puff_list; Just another Joe; Great Dane; Max McGarrity; Tumbleweed_Connection; maxwell; ...
PUFF
2 posted on 11/13/2002 9:23:42 AM PST by SheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
Ahh, but we've known about this for some time. The media is just now picking up on it.
Just goes to show you how good the researching on FR is.
3 posted on 11/13/2002 9:27:15 AM PST by Just another Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
I believe this is true. But it won't stop the crazy lawsuits. In lawsuits, truth doesn't matter, responsibility doesn't matter -- they are all about creed and isanity and sometimes power.
4 posted on 11/13/2002 9:29:10 AM PST by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
Good ammo. Lock and load.
5 posted on 11/13/2002 9:29:43 AM PST by Eastbound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
I'm going to talk my wife into smoking a pipe while I sit next to her.
6 posted on 11/13/2002 9:30:17 AM PST by DWSUWF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dante3
And we all know creed and isanity is vey series!
7 posted on 11/13/2002 9:32:12 AM PST by JennysCool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
When I tried to find this article earlier in the year, I couldn't find it on the newpaper's web site. More important, we do not HAVE the actual study, so this smacks of a false report.

I sincerely hope it is a real study, but I'm skeptical.

8 posted on 11/13/2002 9:35:30 AM PST by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Just another Joe
Just goes to show you how good the researching on FR is.

I think your right, Joe!!!

9 posted on 11/13/2002 9:35:55 AM PST by SheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
When I tried to find this article earlier in the year, I couldn't find it on the newpaper's web site. More important, we do not HAVE the actual study, so this smacks of a false report.

I sincerely hope it is a real study, but I'm skeptical.

10 posted on 11/13/2002 9:36:05 AM PST by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dante3
I believe this is true. But it won't stop the crazy lawsuits. In lawsuits, truth doesn't matter, responsibility doesn't matter -- they are all about creed and isanity and sometimes power.

They keep this stuff swept under the rug so the general public doesn't become aware of it. Just like the Federal Court throwing out the EPA study on second hand smoke! How often do you see THAT! Oh no! The anti's do not WANT us to see the truth.

Federal Court Rules Against EPA on Secondhand Smoke

Too much money to be made for them to ban smoking everywhere. But........the Truth Will Out!

11 posted on 11/13/2002 9:38:16 AM PST by SheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Eastbound
Good ammo. Lock and load.

I think it's in the best interest of us all to bookmark this, or at least copy and paste it into our Word for future reference!

12 posted on 11/13/2002 9:39:20 AM PST by SheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: LS
Ditto LS. I'm intrigued, but I always check back to the source. SheLion did not supply it.
13 posted on 11/13/2002 9:40:48 AM PST by Leonard210
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: LS
I sincerely hope it is a real study, but I'm skeptical.

It's a real study. It's been yanked from the net. Any thoughts on why? eh?

I have a few thoughts!!

14 posted on 11/13/2002 9:41:00 AM PST by SheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Leonard210
SheLion did not supply it.

Oh! I will FIND it. Never fear. Or one of us will.! Don't lose heart.

15 posted on 11/13/2002 9:43:23 AM PST by SheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
"Passive Smoking Doesn't Cause Cancer - Official"

I can agree with this, but it doesn't change the fact that it plays hell with my severe allergies, and sinus infections. One whiff of cigarette smoke and I can't breath for over 24 hours. I can't go to restaurants, clubs, theaters, concerts etc. if there is smoke present. That's my problem and I don't want to make anyone stop smoking, but at the same time, smokers need to be considerate of others and not smoke in their presense, in public unless they ask if it's ok first. Of course I have a bad spitting habit and sometimes hit others in the face. This is ok too, isn't it?
16 posted on 11/13/2002 9:45:50 AM PST by XDemocrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
Boo Hoo.
Now what will the neurotics bawl about??

Poor babies!

17 posted on 11/13/2002 9:48:29 AM PST by Publius6961
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
Who cares if it causes cancer or not?

If any of you smoke around your kids, you should be jailed! I personally suffered more grief than I can tell you due to the fact that I lived with two chainsmokers (had no choice, I was a kid!) in a small apartment for 10 years. Second hand smoke hurts peoples' lungs more than you could imagine!

I was hacking and wheezing whenever I tried to play football or even do a 1 mile run in P.E. class. The physician who examined me was convinced I had asthma, and I was put on a steroid-based inhaler medication for years! (Strangely, it never helped - I wonder why?!?!?) This could have kept me out of the Army!

But lo and behold, as soon as I am moved out within a few months I am running 2 miles in under 13 minutes! Please don't destroy your kids' lungs. If you have to smoke, do it outside and don't make them the victims! This is still a source of tension between my mom and me... I have told her that when her grandkids arrive they will not be visiting her house if I can smell even a trace of tobacco there, and that more likely she'll just have to come to my place. I won't screw up my kids' health on the basis of any studies, that's for sure!

18 posted on 11/13/2002 9:48:44 AM PST by American Soldier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
Well, the ARTICLE says it's a real study. But as I say, I could not even confirm the AUTHOR at the UK newspaper! This is very suspicious, much like "study says little green men held at Wright-Pat."
19 posted on 11/13/2002 9:51:38 AM PST by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: XDemocrat
One whiff of cigarette smoke and I can't breath for over 24 hours.

Ahhh. That's called pychopathic neurotic panic attack.

A good psychiatrist should be able to help.

Specially if merely the odor of burning tobacco does it; You know, one part per quadrillion?

20 posted on 11/13/2002 9:52:20 AM PST by Publius6961
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 581-584 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson