Equally obvious is that a gun misfired when not aimed at her, then reportedly injured her when negligently aimed at her and being evaluated for its misfire.
The comment might make more sense if one had seen the movie "The Omen". In that movie a number of bizarre 'accidents' also occur.
Obviously a pregnent womean who smokes isn't placing the health of her baby foremost in her behavior. Obviously, the person aiming a gun at her is liable if not wholly guilty of the harm.
Obviously, the gun shouldn't have misfired when shot in the air and obviously after being jammed shouldn't have fired into the woman.
Regardless of the obvious, the woman was still injured. My suggestion is that perhaps the not so obvious is a causal factor for the woman.
Excuse me.......but my daughter is 29 years old with a baby if her own. She smokes, and I smoked when I got pregnant with her and nursed her as a smoker. She is fine, the baby is fine and "I" am fine.
So where is your proof that smoking during pregnancy is harmful to a baby? The WHO? hehe
Well, yes, it does make sense now.
You think "The Omen" was a documentary and you have a Hollywood-inspired Satan obsession.
Your apparent inability to differentiate between fantasy and reality has caused you to conclude that this woman's smoking a cigarette was a sign of her consummate evil and that she deserved to be shot, since she was obviously carrying Satan's child.
Was that the point of your nearly incomprehensible post?