Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bill Aims to Ban Workplace Smoking
Newsday | 9/17/02 | J. Palmer

Posted on 09/17/2002 6:15:39 AM PDT by sushiman

For almost 20 years, Suffolk County has been slowly eroding people's rights to smoke in public. With one more measure, the butts could stop here.

A group of bipartisan lawmakers today is expected to unveil a bill that bans smoking in virtually all workplaces - including bingo halls, bowling alleys, bars and restaurants. This effort is the product of talks with officials in Nassau, Westchester and New York City to provide a regional standard for workplace smoking.

The Suffolk bill would allow smoking only in private homes and in private enclosed offices occupied exclusively by smokers. Smoking also would be permitted in outdoor seating at bars and restaurants. State and federal property are exempt from the county's jurisdiction.

In Suffolk now, smoking is limited to separate rooms in all restaurants. It is also banned within 50 feet of hospitals or public buildings and restricted in workplaces.

Brian Foley, a Democratic legislator from Blue Point, said the proposed ban is essential to protect public health and is also a workplace safety issue.

"Second-hand smoke kills tens of thousands of Americans each year and injures the health of tens of thousands more as well," said Foley, who chairs the health committee and is co-sponsoring the bill with fellow Democrat Ginny Fields of Oakdale and Presiding Officer Paul Tonna, a Republican from West Hills. "This reso- lution is going to save lives here in Suffolk County."

Foley said the proposed ban will be discussed in the next health committee meeting Oct. 2. A public hearing before the full legislature will be held Oct. 8.

In Nassau, similar legislation will be considered by the legislature at its Oct. 7 meeting, said Deputy Presiding Officer Roger Corbin (D-Westbury). Corbin, the legislature's health committee chair, said the bill he's introducing is similar to Foley's. He said legislation being considered in Westchester and New York City will be in step with those proposed on Long Island, but is moving slightly slower.

Since talks among policymakers in the downstate region became public last month, the concept of a complete ban has run into stiff opposition from restaurant and bar owners who say businesses will go belly up as customers opt to stay home to smoke in peace.

John Reyerson, owner of McGuire's Restaurant and Comedy Club in Bohemia, said he expects to lose about a third of his business if the legislation is approved. He said a complete ban would be too onerous because about four years ago the county required restaurants and bars to install separate ventilation systems and partitions to segregate smoking and nonsmoking areas.

"There is no way I'm going to recoup my investment," said Reyerson, who is also chairman of the board of directors for the Suffolk Restaurant and Tavern Association. "They are not going to come here and have a beer and watch a football game if they can't have a smoke. Why would they?"

Suffolk Legis. Fred Towle (R-Shirley) said the ban is too intrusive and takes away people's ability to make decisions. "There comes a point when government has gone too far," he said.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: michaeldobbs; pufflist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 161-162 next last
To: Tazman70
There is plenty of evidence that second hand smoke is dangerous. Have you been hiding under a rock????

HAVE YOU BEEN HIDING UNDER A ROCK????

Federal Court Rules Against EPA on Secondhand Smoke

I think any anti who tries to dismiss the findings of the U.S. Department of Energy labs at Oak Ridge, should be confronted with the question: "Are you saying that DOE researchers committed scientific fraud and that their findings on ETS exposure are untrue?"

Statistics and Data Sciences Group Projects

81 posted on 09/17/2002 8:27:04 AM PDT by SheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Tazman70
You are just in denial, read the article, the science is there.

I read the article, no science is presented. Have you read the other scientific studies which were previously cite in this thread?

You dont have any scientific evidence jesus crist lived but you know he did right?

Please leave the lord out of this. Particularly since you can't spell his name or capitalize it. And since you are wrong about the evidence that he existed, it is one of the most documented lives in history.

But you try to change the topic. The topic is property rights and the junk science which is used to try to usurp them.

82 posted on 09/17/2002 8:28:39 AM PDT by Protagoras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Gabz
"...government interference just causes further problems."

Exactly. When will people learn?

83 posted on 09/17/2002 8:29:30 AM PDT by Badray
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

Comment #84 Removed by Moderator

To: Sloth
Not really. BTW, you misspelled 'reconsider.'

Thanks for the correction.

Now it should be pointed out that your logic is even more faulty than my spelling skills.

85 posted on 09/17/2002 8:33:28 AM PDT by Protagoras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
sounds sensible to me. Too bad they're ruining their own fresh air with smoke. I know it's a tough habit to quit though. I won't be a Nazi about it. I'm still hoping my dad will quit his 40+ year habit. He's only 59 and I want him around to see some more grandkids.
86 posted on 09/17/2002 8:33:54 AM PDT by strider44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Tazman70
Is that really your picture on your profile, cause you look like a guy in drag!!

Predictable.

87 posted on 09/17/2002 8:34:28 AM PDT by Protagoras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Tazman70; *puff_list; Just another Joe; Gabz; Great Dane; Max McGarrity; Tumbleweed_Connection; ...
Is that really your picture on your profile, cause you look like a guy in drag!!

Tazman70 signed up 2002-08-30.

I don't think this one will last long, does anyone else?

88 posted on 09/17/2002 8:36:04 AM PDT by SheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Tazman70
"Is that really your picture on your profile, cause you look like a guy in drag!!"

Even without a picture on your profile, it's obvious that you are a very small man that has to resort to personal attacks when you lose arguments. Now apologize and be polite or go away.

89 posted on 09/17/2002 8:36:31 AM PDT by Badray
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: strider44
But I think making them smoke outside is the right decision.

But the problem is we've passed that point too. Smoking outside (even in designated areas) is also under attack by the anti-nico nazis.

90 posted on 09/17/2002 8:39:35 AM PDT by Hillarys Gate Cult
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: strider44
Question:do you think there should be a finite amount of smoke breaks a worker should be allowed? during a typical 8-hour workday?

should be no different than breaks for any other worker doing anything else - like going for another cup of coffee....

91 posted on 09/17/2002 8:39:59 AM PDT by Gabz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: *all
Because breaking wind has not been found to cause harm to anyone. I agree it is offensive, but not harmful like second hand smoke.

This person is brain dead. Too much wacky weed, I think.

92 posted on 09/17/2002 8:40:33 AM PDT by SheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
I sure don't.

Thanks, AM

93 posted on 09/17/2002 8:42:14 AM PDT by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: johnny7
Never cared much for FDR.

I can't stand the thought of the SOB or his bucktoothed bride, but he was a smoker and nobody could call him stupid.

94 posted on 09/17/2002 8:42:19 AM PDT by metesky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
I don't think this one will last long, does anyone else?

Who wants to bet that this person is not on their first screename or their first revocation?

95 posted on 09/17/2002 8:45:32 AM PDT by Protagoras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
Bye bye to the most recent incarnation of that poster.
96 posted on 09/17/2002 8:48:20 AM PDT by Protagoras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: Badray
Exactly. When will people learn?

Unfortunately not soon enough.

97 posted on 09/17/2002 8:51:16 AM PDT by Gabz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator
I sure don't.

Thank you SO much! They can attack my beliefs, they can attack my research, they can attack my posts. But they can NOT attack my face. LOL!

My daughter sure doesn't think I look like a guy in drag. haha!

98 posted on 09/17/2002 8:52:39 AM PDT by SheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: ThomasJefferson; SheLion
Tazman70 signed up 2002-08-30.
This account has been banned.
99 posted on 09/17/2002 8:52:42 AM PDT by metesky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: ThomasJefferson
Bye bye to the most recent incarnation of that poster.

~whew

Thank God. I sure hate to get nasty in here. But that's uncalled for.

Maybe he is a 14-year-old on daddy's computer.

100 posted on 09/17/2002 8:54:51 AM PDT by SheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 161-162 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson