Posted on 09/17/2002 6:15:39 AM PDT by sushiman
For almost 20 years, Suffolk County has been slowly eroding people's rights to smoke in public. With one more measure, the butts could stop here.
A group of bipartisan lawmakers today is expected to unveil a bill that bans smoking in virtually all workplaces - including bingo halls, bowling alleys, bars and restaurants. This effort is the product of talks with officials in Nassau, Westchester and New York City to provide a regional standard for workplace smoking.
The Suffolk bill would allow smoking only in private homes and in private enclosed offices occupied exclusively by smokers. Smoking also would be permitted in outdoor seating at bars and restaurants. State and federal property are exempt from the county's jurisdiction.
In Suffolk now, smoking is limited to separate rooms in all restaurants. It is also banned within 50 feet of hospitals or public buildings and restricted in workplaces.
Brian Foley, a Democratic legislator from Blue Point, said the proposed ban is essential to protect public health and is also a workplace safety issue.
"Second-hand smoke kills tens of thousands of Americans each year and injures the health of tens of thousands more as well," said Foley, who chairs the health committee and is co-sponsoring the bill with fellow Democrat Ginny Fields of Oakdale and Presiding Officer Paul Tonna, a Republican from West Hills. "This reso- lution is going to save lives here in Suffolk County."
Foley said the proposed ban will be discussed in the next health committee meeting Oct. 2. A public hearing before the full legislature will be held Oct. 8.
In Nassau, similar legislation will be considered by the legislature at its Oct. 7 meeting, said Deputy Presiding Officer Roger Corbin (D-Westbury). Corbin, the legislature's health committee chair, said the bill he's introducing is similar to Foley's. He said legislation being considered in Westchester and New York City will be in step with those proposed on Long Island, but is moving slightly slower.
Since talks among policymakers in the downstate region became public last month, the concept of a complete ban has run into stiff opposition from restaurant and bar owners who say businesses will go belly up as customers opt to stay home to smoke in peace.
John Reyerson, owner of McGuire's Restaurant and Comedy Club in Bohemia, said he expects to lose about a third of his business if the legislation is approved. He said a complete ban would be too onerous because about four years ago the county required restaurants and bars to install separate ventilation systems and partitions to segregate smoking and nonsmoking areas.
"There is no way I'm going to recoup my investment," said Reyerson, who is also chairman of the board of directors for the Suffolk Restaurant and Tavern Association. "They are not going to come here and have a beer and watch a football game if they can't have a smoke. Why would they?"
Suffolk Legis. Fred Towle (R-Shirley) said the ban is too intrusive and takes away people's ability to make decisions. "There comes a point when government has gone too far," he said.
HAVE YOU BEEN HIDING UNDER A ROCK????
Federal Court Rules Against EPA on Secondhand Smoke
I think any anti who tries to dismiss the findings of the U.S. Department of Energy labs at Oak Ridge, should be confronted with the question: "Are you saying that DOE researchers committed scientific fraud and that their findings on ETS exposure are untrue?"
I read the article, no science is presented. Have you read the other scientific studies which were previously cite in this thread?
You dont have any scientific evidence jesus crist lived but you know he did right?
Please leave the lord out of this. Particularly since you can't spell his name or capitalize it. And since you are wrong about the evidence that he existed, it is one of the most documented lives in history.
But you try to change the topic. The topic is property rights and the junk science which is used to try to usurp them.
Exactly. When will people learn?
Thanks for the correction.
Now it should be pointed out that your logic is even more faulty than my spelling skills.
Predictable.
Tazman70 signed up 2002-08-30.
I don't think this one will last long, does anyone else?
Even without a picture on your profile, it's obvious that you are a very small man that has to resort to personal attacks when you lose arguments. Now apologize and be polite or go away.
But the problem is we've passed that point too. Smoking outside (even in designated areas) is also under attack by the anti-nico nazis.
should be no different than breaks for any other worker doing anything else - like going for another cup of coffee....
This person is brain dead. Too much wacky weed, I think.
Thanks, AM
I can't stand the thought of the SOB or his bucktoothed bride, but he was a smoker and nobody could call him stupid.
Who wants to bet that this person is not on their first screename or their first revocation?
Unfortunately not soon enough.
Thank you SO much! They can attack my beliefs, they can attack my research, they can attack my posts. But they can NOT attack my face. LOL!
My daughter sure doesn't think I look like a guy in drag. haha!
~whew
Thank God. I sure hate to get nasty in here. But that's uncalled for.
Maybe he is a 14-year-old on daddy's computer.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.