Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

HERE COME THE FAT POLICE
Fiedor Report On the News #287 ^ | 9-15-02 | Doug Fiedor

Posted on 09/14/2002 9:39:44 AM PDT by forest

Back in the early 1970s, the hippie culture chanted "down with the establishment." Today, they are the adults -- teachers, reporters, lawyers, judges, legislators, and they make up the membership of dozens of foundations and non-government organizations -- affecting the establishment. And still, each group, in its own way, seems to be working to dismantle our American establishment.

As far as the average American citizen is concerned, our judicial system has become lethargic, cumbersome and ineffective at protecting our rights. Often, the judicial system appears little more then the playground for corrupt lawyers and their partners, the judges.

One case in point was the fiasco of the tobacco lawsuits. The attorneys involved became instant multimillionaires. Judges completely trashed the rights of American corporations and consumers. Unscrupulous tax and spend legislators allowed the foolishness to go forward because it gave them permission to levy yet another heavy tax. Everyone won. Except the average American consumer, that is. Consumers got the bill in the form of yet another hidden tax.

Of course, we are supposed to forget those billions of dollars changing hands at our expense. The published excuse was that the nanny state was protecting the public health. Never mind that everyone involved, except the consumer, had a vested interest.

As we warned back then, that foolishness was just a test case by those unscrupulous lawyers. The corrupters of the courts wanted to see if unprincipled judges would allow the frivolous cases, and they did. Well, the sharks still smell blood -- easy money. So, here come the fat police. Their first scam worked. Now they plan to go after many successful major American corporations under the guise of public health. Even the liberal concerns, like Ben & Jerry's Ice Cream, are targets.

They're getting plenty of help, too. In between crying about global hunger, the World Health Organization declares obesity a global epidemic. Reports state that, in the United States, 61 percent of adults aged 20 to 74 are considered overweight or obese. About a quarter of American youth are overweight or obese.

Obesity is determined by body mass index (BMI). That calculation takes into account a person's height, weight and age. According to the U.S. Surgeon General's guidelines for adults 20 years or older, a six-foot tall adult 20 years or older with a weight of 140 to 180 lbs. would be considered healthy, 190 to 210 pounds overweight and 200 pounds or more obese.

The lawsuits have already started. A lawsuit was filed in the New York Supreme Court on behalf of a New York City man who says he has been eating fast food since the 1950s. He has sued the country's four leading fast-food chains, blaming their food's fatty content for his health problems.

The 5-foot-10-inch, 272-pound maintenance worker said he had heart attacks in 1996 and 1999 and has diabetes, high blood pressure and high cholesterol. The suit asserts that it was the fast food chains that made him and others overweight. "They said '100 percent beef.' I thought that meant it was good for you," the plaintiff told reporters. "I thought the food was OK. Those people in the advertisements don't really tell you what's in the food. It's all fat, fat and more fat. Now I'm obese."

"There is direct deception when someone omits telling people food digested is detrimental to their health," his attorney said.

Three teenagers in New York City, aged between 13 and 19, have also filed a class-action lawsuit against McDonald's Corp., saying their fast food caused them to gain as much as 200 pounds and develop serious health problems, including heart disease and diabetes. The lawsuit seeks undetermined compensatory damages.

It appears that lawyers went hunting for these clients. The teenagers' parents are reported to be either unemployed or on disability. One question that cries to be asked is, if these parents do not have much money, how could these kids afford to eat so much at the fast food joints? Also, who fed the parents?

In another test suit, McDonald's and Burger King are being sued by a group that claims the fast food corporations have exposed customers to a cancer-causing substance in their french fries since 1990. This West Coast food police group asserts that the burger corporations' fries contain acrylamide, which they say is listed by California as a known carcinogen. The lawsuit argues that McDonald's and Burger King have sold millions of orders of fries, each containing "100 times more acrylamide than the maximum level permitted by the World Health Organization for drinking water."

Negligence can be described as the failure to exercise the degree of care considered reasonable under the circumstances, resulting in an unintended injury to another party. Is it negligent of Ben & Jerry's Ice Cream to not

tell customers that, although their product is a food, it is not to be used as their complete diet? If not, then why should that be a requirement of any of the fast food chains?

With self determination comes responsibility for what you put in your mouth. If we allow these lawsuits to proceed, that is a direct signal that we Americans are willing to let government make most of our personal decisions for us. And, as with cigarettes, we can also expect huge taxes to be levied on anything bureaucrats wish to label potentially harmful.

If we are going to allow lawsuits "for the children," we should sue government schools. Not only do schools serve junk food to the children, most schools cut out recesses and even gym classes. Instead of letting kids burn off excess energy the natural way, the trend is to drug them into behaving. Clearly, that is detrimental to health.

Bringing this a little closer to home: As one who imbibed in a poor meat and potatoes and high refined carbohydrate diet -- made worse by the consumption of an excessive amount of adult beverages -- for way too long, I can attest firsthand to the resultant health difficulties. So, who do I blame? Was it those who sold me the foodstuffs for the poor diet or the producers of beer, vodka and bourbon?

Unlike those who call for the nanny state, I know damn well who is to blame: the one staring back at me in the mirror every morning. No person ever force-fed me anything. Nor has any person or concern ever tricked me into eating or drinking anything that was bad for me. I, as an adult, did it all myself. The problem, therefore, is mine to correct.

So, it is interesting that I could now add my name to a class action lawsuit and get paid for my own personal abuse. Appalling, actually! Excuse me if I fail to believe that is how our law is supposed to work.

It is time voters instruct their representatives in government to insure these legal actions do not go forward. The lawsuits are an insult to the liberty of a free people.

 

 END


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Government
KEYWORDS: attorneysrich; bmi; hiddentax; hippieculture; judicialsystem; nannystate; pufflist; selfdole; sharks; taxandspend; tobaccolawsuits; whoepidemic
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last
To: Eala
Thanks for reposting that; because I've never read it.

The more things change, the more they stay the same, huh?

41 posted on 09/15/2002 1:15:49 PM PDT by Madame Dufarge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: forest
Even the liberal concerns, like Ben & Jerry's Ice Cream, are targets.


42 posted on 09/15/2002 1:30:01 PM PDT by Madame Dufarge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: forest; Gabz; SheLion; Madame Dufarge
What if It's All Been a Big Fat Lie?
43 posted on 09/15/2002 1:39:31 PM PDT by metesky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: forest
You know, a long time ago I read a post on FR stating that lawyers would be suing for fat people next. I didn't comment, I considered that an absolute heavy tin-foil post. Boy, was I wrong.
44 posted on 09/15/2002 1:44:41 PM PDT by xJones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Smokin' Joe
the BMI is just the old chart in a formula. I'm 6 feet tall, weigh 228, and can pick up an engine block (stripped, no main caps) and put it on the stand (8 cylinder, not a 4-banger). The last time I weighed in at 180 lbs, I had been underfed (grad school) for eight months and spent one week of that time with no food at all. Muscle weighs more than fat.

The article saying that a 6' tall man is considered obese at 200 lbs. caught my attention, too. My husband is 6', 200 lbs. (though maybe down to 195 now) and he is definitely not obese. When he weighed 170 lbs. a few years ago, he looked too thin. Now, he's built thicker, but with weightlifting, running, etc. he's still in good shape. Those weight charts are ridiculous sometimes.

45 posted on 09/15/2002 1:55:45 PM PDT by Tired of Taxes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: forest
Even the liberal concerns, like Ben & Jerry's Ice Cream, are targets.

Ben & Jerry's!? Those dioxin purveyors?

("The study shows that the level of dioxin in a sample serving of one variety of Ben & Jerry's brand ice cream is about 2,200 times greater than the level of dioxin allowed in wastewater discharged into San Francisco Bay from the Tosco oil refinery." study)

46 posted on 09/15/2002 2:45:01 PM PDT by Eala
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xJones
You know, a long time ago I read a post on FR stating that lawyers would be suing for fat people next. I didn't comment, I considered that an absolute heavy tin-foil post. Boy, was I wrong.

Good thing we are not gloaters...... we're not going to say, "We told you so." :-}

47 posted on 09/15/2002 5:58:32 PM PDT by Great Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Great Dane
Good thing we are not gloaters...... we're not going to say, "We told you so." :-}

Well, don't try and sue me, I never said anything! :)

48 posted on 09/15/2002 6:04:54 PM PDT by xJones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Great Dane
You know, when a doctor can explain why a vegan gets cancer, a man goes into the hospital for an operation and has the wrong body part removed, when a perfectly healthy fetus is sucked down a drain and why it's estimated that doctors kill 98,000 patients per year due to negligence and/or ineptitude....then I'll decide to listen to his preaching on smoking.

Why is it they call their job a "practice"? If you're still "practicing", you're not worth $75 for 10 minutes of your office time.

49 posted on 09/15/2002 6:20:00 PM PDT by Thumper1960
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: xJones
True. No one believed it then. You'll never believe what's next.
50 posted on 09/15/2002 6:22:14 PM PDT by Thumper1960
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: xJones
#48...... How could anyone possibly know all levels of governments would become so dependent on sin taxes.
51 posted on 09/15/2002 6:27:08 PM PDT by Great Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Thumper1960
#49......... Mind if I borrow this, it will be my next reply to my good doctor. ??
52 posted on 09/15/2002 6:28:21 PM PDT by Great Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Smokin' Joe
BTW, the BMI is just the old chart in a formula. I'm 6 feet tall, weigh 228, and can pick up an engine block (stripped, no main caps) and put it on the stand (8 cylinder, not a 4-banger). The last time I weighed in at 180 lbs, I had been underfed (grad school) for eight months and spent one week of that time with no food at all. Muscle weighs more than fat. The index should be a factor of total body fat as a percentage, not just body weight.

I'm glad you mentioned this. What's also important is that they changed the rules a couple of years ago. What used to be acceptable BMI is now marginal or even "obese". My BMI is borderline obese under the new rules as well, despite my having a slightly better than average body-fat %. I'm not Arnold but I stay in shape.

53 posted on 09/15/2002 6:28:24 PM PDT by meyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Meat
,,, first they sue the tobacco companies for giving them lung cancer; then the fast food places for making them fat; guess I can sue Budweiser for all the ugly women I've slept with.
54 posted on 09/15/2002 6:32:24 PM PDT by shaggy eel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shaggy eel
But you can thank Budweiser for giving you the courage to do it.
55 posted on 09/15/2002 6:36:36 PM PDT by Uncle Meat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Great Dane
Be my guest!
56 posted on 09/15/2002 6:56:15 PM PDT by Thumper1960
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
Bubba says "Just let him say something to me. I'm ready."

I agree with Bubba.
My doctor always asks me if I've quit, I always reply that I'll quit when she can guarantee that I'll live to be 118 if I do.
That ends the converation.

57 posted on 09/15/2002 8:16:15 PM PDT by Just another Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Meat
And for inebriating the women as well!
58 posted on 09/16/2002 12:45:34 AM PDT by glorygirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: j271
Yet the lawyers wouldn't do it if there wasn't money to be made. Is tort reform the answer, or are there broader issues that cannot be addressed through mere legislation?

Eliminate punative damages. If its bad enough to be punished, then pass a law through the legislative process. Judicial legislation for the enrichment of lawyers must be stopped. Its destroying the very freedoms that make this country great.

59 posted on 09/16/2002 12:56:20 AM PDT by meyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Eala
"In between come all the hundreds of little steps, some of them imperceptible, each of them preparing you not to be shocked by the next. Step C is not so much worse than Step B, and, if you did not make a stand at Step B, why should you at Step C? And so on to Step D."

"And one day, too late, your principles, if you were ever sensible of them, all rush in upon you."

For want of a nail, a shoe was lost...

60 posted on 09/16/2002 1:02:57 AM PDT by glorygirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson