To be sure it's a complex issue to resolve. But then again, if you stick to the law and act accordingly, it becomes quite simple really.
Just two years ago California whites dropped below the 50% mark in population. I just saw figures that stated they had already droped to 46.5% since then. I'm sure Davis and Clinton must be off in some corner somewhere celebrating up a storm.
I think the movie was pretty fair in how it portrayed the "melting pot" was no longer melting together, and that the political correctness of diversity had created a divisive balkanized nightmare with all the individual ethnic enclaves battling for political power and dominance of their cultures.
Some of the perspectives included:
1. The infrastructure was completely breaking down due the huge influx of immigrants;
2. States rights v. federal jurisdiction;
3. Ordinary citizens fed up with the destruction of our standard of living;
4. The compassion we should continue to show the poor of the World;
5. The almost rabid position of the pro-immigrant group;
6. The wrongful influence of modern media on occuring events:
7. The foolish actions by all the politicians involved;
8. The militia/separatist and other hateful groups;
9. The question of American military fighting its own;
10. The inherent racism (or preference to culture) that's in all of us.
Other than the farcical portrayal of the main characters, I found it deeply unsettling. I was surprised I never heard of this movie, and even more suprised that someone would produce it. It represented in detail what many have been warning about for years. I fear that someday this little movie may be seen as prophecy, even with the dramatic license it incorporated.
movie title: The Second Civil War (produced in 1997)
As soon as whites ceased to be the majority in CA, the San Diego city council acted to outlaw the use of the word "minority" in all official city publications. The word was publicly flogged as "demeaning". The official replacement for "minority" in all city documents is the phrase "people of color". Do you suppose there was a political motive behind the sudden change in the definition of terms? Once whites were no longer 50% plus 1, the power of minority preference programs ceased to carry a punitive anti-white element. Minority preferences have been recast as "people of color" preferences.
A San Diego talk radio program decided to explore the community reaction to the change in terminology. One lady expressed concern that the phrase "people of color" would be shortened to "colored people". The more things change, the more they stay the same. California is now a confused mix of pluralities.
The old phrase, "When you can rob Peter to pay Paul, you'll always have Paul's vote" is indicative of the direction in California. As the parasites increase in voting clout, the producers will have no option but to leave CA or be totally enslaved to the state. CA will continue the descent into a 3rd world future.