Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Study Shows Passive Cigarette Smoke At Least Doubles Risk Of Cancer In Cats
ScienceDaily | 7/30/2002 | Tufts University

Posted on 07/30/2002 11:21:59 AM PDT by sourcery

North Grafton, Mass., July 29, 2002 - Cats living in homes where people smoke cigarettes are more than twice as likely as other cats to acquire a deadly form of cancer known as feline lymphoma, according to a first-of-its kind study in cats conducted by scientists at Tufts University School of Veterinary Medicine and the University of Massachusetts. The study, entitled "Environmental Tobacco Smoke and Risk of Malignant Lymphoma in Pet Cats," is published in the August 1 issue of the American Journal of Epidemiology. The authors conclude that these findings offer a compelling reason for further study of the relationship between passive smoke and non-Hodgkins lymphoma in humans, which is similar to lymphoma in cats. "It has long been believed that the major cause of feline lymphoma was feline leukemia virus," explained Antony S. Moore, VMSc, a board-certified veterinary oncologist and director of Tufts' Harrington Oncology Program. "The results of our study clearly indicate that exposure to environmental factors such as second-hand tobacco smoke has devastating consequences for cats because it significantly increases their likelihood of contracting lymphoma."

Several recent studies in humans have suggested that people who smoke tobacco may have an increased risk of contracting non-Hodgkins lymphoma. In addition, other studies have suggested that children of parents who smoke may have an increased risk of developing lymphoma. The results of these studies, however, are often hard to prove due to the myriad of other risk factors that people face.

In sharing their living environments with humans, cats are exposed to many of the same environmental contaminants as their owners, including tobacco smoke. Exposure levels in cats continuously kept indoors may actually be higher than those of human household members, who often spend extended periods of time outside their homes. Cats may become exposed by inhaling the smoke or by ingesting it when they groom themselves and lick particulate matter off of their fur.

"We believe that feline exposure patterns to environmental tobacco smoke may mimic those of young children living in households where adults smoke and where the children inhale tobacco smoke or ingest particulate matter by mouthing contaminated objects," said Elizabeth R. Bertone, ScD, Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.

An epidemiologist and lead author of this study, Bertone added: "Our findings offer another reason for smokers living with pets and children to try to 'kick the habit.' Quitting smoking will not only reduce their risk of cancer, heart disease and diabetes, but may reduce the risk of cancer in their children and pets as well."

To evaluate whether exposure to household environmental tobacco smoke may increase the risk of feline lymphoma, the authors conducted a case-control study of this relationship in 180 cats who were treated at Tufts Veterinary School's Foster Hospital for Small Animals between 1993 and 2000. Eighty of the cats were treated for lymphoma and 100 were treated for renal failure.

After adjusting for age and other factors, the relative risk of lymphoma for cats exposed to any household environmental tobacco smoke was more than double (2.4) that of cats not exposed to tobacco smoke. The risk of cats acquiring cancer increased with both their duration and quantity of tobacco smoke exposure. Cats that were exposed for five or more years had a risk of more than triple (3.2) that of other cats.

Risk of lymphoma also appeared to be related to the number of smokers living in the home, with nearly a double relative risk (1.9) for cats living with one smoker, and a four-fold increase in risk (4.1) for cats living with two or more smokers. In addition, cats living in households where humans smoked a pack or more of cigarettes per day had a significant three-fold (3.3) increase in risk compared to cats living in homes where people did not smoke.

Previous studies have not addressed the association between environmental tobacco smoke and lymphoma in pets. While no clear mechanism has been proposed to explain an association between active or passive smoking and the development of non-Hodgkins lymphoma in humans, the new study indicates several components of tobacco smoke may be carcinogenic to lymphoid tissue and may cause mutation in certain tissues.

Laura A. Snyder, DVM, a recent graduate of Tufts Veterinary School, co-authored this study in collaboration with Drs. Bertone and Moore. The investigation was supported by the National Institutes for Health, the Geraldine R. Dodge Foundation, the Cape Cod Cat Club and the International Feline Foundation.

Facts about Feline Lymphoma

Feline lymphoma is the most common cancer in cats, and often involves their intestinal tracts. Cats that contract lymphoma are usually about 10-years-old. The typical treatment protocol involves chemotherapy and possibly radiation therapy for a course of about six months. The cost of treatment is $2,000 to $3,000. Approximately 65 percent of cats that receive treatment go into remission, and about 25 percent of them survive more for more than two years.


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: pufflist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last

1 posted on 07/30/2002 11:21:59 AM PDT by sourcery
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sourcery; *puff_list; Just another Joe; Gabz; Great Dane; Max McGarrity; Tumbleweed_Connection; ...
I've had cats all my life, and have smoked all my adult life. My cats all live to be 15 years-old. I'm not even going to go there.
2 posted on 07/30/2002 11:29:47 AM PDT by SheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
Me, too.
3 posted on 07/30/2002 11:40:32 AM PDT by reformedliberal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
Hey, if this is true, you might as well let your cats light up. At least they'll get the "buzz"...
4 posted on 07/30/2002 11:42:19 AM PDT by HumanaeVitae
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sourcery
New Study Shows Smokers Twice As Likely As Non-Smokers To Spend Thousands Of Dollars On Sick Cats.
5 posted on 07/30/2002 11:43:49 AM PDT by per loin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sourcery
New study shows there is an abundance of cats for research.
6 posted on 07/30/2002 11:45:10 AM PDT by Khurkris
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sourcery
I can't tell from the article; Are they for or against smoking around cats?
7 posted on 07/30/2002 11:46:54 AM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
The article is full of crap.

It isn't caused by smoke, rather by feline leukemia. I know, I lost one to lymphoma.

BTW, the average age isn't ten either, according to my vet it is around 6.

"It is generally believed to be related to exposure to feline leukemia virus or, in some patients, feline immunodeficiency virus."

8 posted on 07/30/2002 11:46:59 AM PDT by jumpstartme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jumpstartme
Let us see, if I had a 1 in 10 million chance of contacting a disease, etc., doubling my risk would put me at 1 in 5 million.
More junk science.
9 posted on 07/30/2002 11:50:51 AM PDT by dtel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen
I can't tell from the article; Are they for or against smoking around cats?

I think they are for smoking cats.

10 posted on 07/30/2002 11:50:58 AM PDT by gubamyster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: HumanaeVitae
Hey, if this is true, you might as well let your cats light up. At least they'll get the "buzz"...

No way, I spend enough feeding these 2 picky cats of mine, I'm not going to get them started on cigarettes. I'm sure they would only smoke the expensive brands.

11 posted on 07/30/2002 11:55:57 AM PDT by muggs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dtel
Junk science bump.

Ours got it for entirely unique reasons. Genetics more than anything else. That's another problem with the article. Different full bred cats (and dogs) have a far greater chance than your average mixed breed. It really depends on the genetics. And, some breeders are very careful about it and some aren't. That's the reason the odds make no sense either...

As a uneducated consumer, you really can't tell by looking at the animal.
12 posted on 07/30/2002 11:57:44 AM PDT by jumpstartme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: sourcery
Pussies!!!
13 posted on 07/30/2002 11:58:22 AM PDT by drjimmy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jumpstartme
As odd as it may seem, mixed breed animals tend to be more hardy and disease resistant.
Hybrid vigor, they call it in the cow business.
Tends to bring out the best in both breeds.
14 posted on 07/30/2002 12:02:16 PM PDT by dtel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: drjimmy
Well, here's one more benefit to not being a cat.
15 posted on 07/30/2002 12:02:43 PM PDT by WaterDragon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: sourcery
Junk Science:

"We dropped a 10lb bag of sugar on rats at our test facility. We have come to the conclusion that excess glucose causes internal hemoraging, shortness of breath, unexplained bone fractures, and eventually, death."

How much money got spent on these studies?
16 posted on 07/30/2002 12:04:31 PM PDT by CougarGA7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sourcery
I just can't see this as reason for me to quit.

BTW, anyone have that picture of the cat with the beer, the remote and the pack of Marlboro's?

17 posted on 07/30/2002 12:06:52 PM PDT by CaptRon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muggs
Yeah. And knowing cats, they'd probably grow goatees, put on berets and start going on about the pointlessness of life.
18 posted on 07/30/2002 12:10:54 PM PDT by HumanaeVitae
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: CaptRon

19 posted on 07/30/2002 12:11:11 PM PDT by jumpstartme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: sourcery
Everybody laugh while you can....

I'm going to go out on a limb and make a prediction - Smoking will be outlawed in homes where pets are present.

Why do you think they are doing these 'studies'?

Here in CA, smoking is illegal in restaurants, bars, etc., and I think there are plans (if it hasn't already been done already) to outlaw smoking in homes that employ people (i.e. maids)

It's scary to live in such a 'progressive' state :-O

20 posted on 07/30/2002 12:12:59 PM PDT by Isle of sanity in CA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson